diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-multimedia/libtiff/tiff/0001-Revised-handling-of-TIFFTAG_INKNAMES-and-related-TIF.patch | 4 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/libtiff/tiff/0001-Revised-handling-of-TIFFTAG_INKNAMES-and-related-TIF.patch b/meta/recipes-multimedia/libtiff/tiff/0001-Revised-handling-of-TIFFTAG_INKNAMES-and-related-TIF.patch index 17b37be041..261421b399 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/libtiff/tiff/0001-Revised-handling-of-TIFFTAG_INKNAMES-and-related-TIF.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/libtiff/tiff/0001-Revised-handling-of-TIFFTAG_INKNAMES-and-related-TIF.patch | |||
| @@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ This MR will close the following issues: #149, #150, #152, #168 (to be checked) | |||
| 23 | 23 | ||
| 24 | It also fixes the old bug at http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2599, for which the limitation of `NumberOfInks = SPP` was introduced, which is in my opinion not necessary and does not solve the general issue. | 24 | It also fixes the old bug at http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2599, for which the limitation of `NumberOfInks = SPP` was introduced, which is in my opinion not necessary and does not solve the general issue. |
| 25 | 25 | ||
| 26 | CVE: CVE-2022-3599 CVE-2022-4645 | 26 | CVE: CVE-2022-3599 |
| 27 | CVE: CVE-2022-4645 | ||
| 28 | CVE: CVE-2023-30774 | ||
| 27 | Upstream-Status: Backport [https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/commit/e813112545942107551433d61afd16ac094ff246.patch] | 29 | Upstream-Status: Backport [https://gitlab.com/libtiff/libtiff/-/commit/e813112545942107551433d61afd16ac094ff246.patch] |
| 28 | Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com> | 30 | Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com> |
| 29 | Signed-off-by: Pawan Badganchi <Pawan.Badganchi@kpit.com> | 31 | Signed-off-by: Pawan Badganchi <Pawan.Badganchi@kpit.com> |