summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--meta/recipes-devtools/rust/files/0001-cargo-do-not-write-host-information-into-compilation.patch51
-rw-r--r--meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-source.inc1
2 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/files/0001-cargo-do-not-write-host-information-into-compilation.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/files/0001-cargo-do-not-write-host-information-into-compilation.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a6ee867605
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/files/0001-cargo-do-not-write-host-information-into-compilation.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
1From 065d7c263091118437465d714d8a29dbb6296921 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2From: Alexander Kanavin <alex@linutronix.de>
3Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 14:57:54 +0200
4Subject: [PATCH] cargo: do not write host information into compilation unit
5 hashes
6
7This breaks reproducibility in cross-builds where the cross-target
8can be the same, but build hosts are different, as seen with
9"rustc --version -v":
10...
11host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
12
13vs.
14
15host: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
16
17This can possibly be improved by only hashing host info if the build
18is a native one (e.g. there's no --target option passed to cargo
19invocation) but I'm not sure how.
20
21Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [reported at https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/13922]
22Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex@linutronix.de>
23---
24 .../src/cargo/core/compiler/context/compilation_files.rs | 4 ++--
25 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
26
27diff --git a/src/tools/cargo/src/cargo/core/compiler/context/compilation_files.rs b/src/tools/cargo/src/cargo/core/compiler/context/compilation_files.rs
28index d83dbf10c..b2ad8d9f3 100644
29--- a/src/tools/cargo/src/cargo/core/compiler/context/compilation_files.rs
30+++ b/src/tools/cargo/src/cargo/core/compiler/context/compilation_files.rs
31@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ fn hash_rustc_version(bcx: &BuildContext<'_, '_>, hasher: &mut StableHasher) {
32 if vers.pre.is_empty() || bcx.config.cli_unstable().separate_nightlies {
33 // For stable, keep the artifacts separate. This helps if someone is
34 // testing multiple versions, to avoid recompiles.
35- bcx.rustc().verbose_version.hash(hasher);
36+ //bcx.rustc().verbose_version.hash(hasher);
37 return;
38 }
39 // On "nightly"/"beta"/"dev"/etc, keep each "channel" separate. Don't hash
40@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ fn hash_rustc_version(bcx: &BuildContext<'_, '_>, hasher: &mut StableHasher) {
41 // Keep "host" since some people switch hosts to implicitly change
42 // targets, (like gnu vs musl or gnu vs msvc). In the future, we may want
43 // to consider hashing `unit.kind.short_name()` instead.
44- bcx.rustc().host.hash(hasher);
45+ //bcx.rustc().host.hash(hasher);
46 // None of the other lines are important. Currently they are:
47 // binary: rustc <-- or "rustdoc"
48 // commit-hash: 38114ff16e7856f98b2b4be7ab4cd29b38bed59a
49--
502.39.2
51
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-source.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-source.inc
index 8a8e48b8ca..55ea1b77e6 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-source.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rust/rust-source.inc
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ SRC_URI += "https://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rustc-${RUST_VERSION}-src.tar.xz;n
13 file://target-build-value.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \ 13 file://target-build-value.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
14 file://0001-Handle-vendored-sources-when-remapping-paths.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \ 14 file://0001-Handle-vendored-sources-when-remapping-paths.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
15 file://repro-issue-fix-with-v175.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \ 15 file://repro-issue-fix-with-v175.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
16 file://0001-cargo-do-not-write-host-information-into-compilation.patch;patchdir=${RUSTSRC} \
16" 17"
17SRC_URI[rust.sha256sum] = "4526f786d673e4859ff2afa0bab2ba13c918b796519a25c1acce06dba9542340" 18SRC_URI[rust.sha256sum] = "4526f786d673e4859ff2afa0bab2ba13c918b796519a25c1acce06dba9542340"
18 19