diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch | 10 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch index db3a70e803..a0d2502d24 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch | |||
| @@ -10,7 +10,15 @@ Change suggested by Julian Taylor. | |||
| 10 | 10 | ||
| 11 | Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757037 | 11 | Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757037 |
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | Upstream-Status: Pending | 13 | RP: Patch is still in debian as of 20220524 in a revised form: |
| 14 | https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/ | ||
| 15 | https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/0001-Conditionally-replace-reinvention-of-memcpy-with-cal.patch/ | ||
| 16 | It was submitted in 2015, no reply to an email from RP in 2022 either. | ||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | We likely need this in OE to prevent against unaligned accesses | ||
| 19 | on systems such as armv5. | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | Upstream-Status: Inactive-Upstream | ||
| 14 | Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> | 22 | Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> |
| 15 | --- | 23 | --- |
| 16 | minilzo/minilzo.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ | 24 | minilzo/minilzo.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ |