diff options
| author | Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com> | 2017-09-29 17:52:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2017-10-07 23:20:39 +0100 |
| commit | 16f1a14f83353b809650ce5fe50b35e38b6c6d7e (patch) | |
| tree | da594c3ffd5d88960efe82dc2977f1bbb7dd5ec5 /meta | |
| parent | 03839a7ffa395edaf85e74a86799a44b217b79d3 (diff) | |
| download | poky-16f1a14f83353b809650ce5fe50b35e38b6c6d7e.tar.gz | |
license.py: Correct selection of licenses in is_included()
When faced with multiple sets of licenses combined with | (OR), it was
possible for oe.license.is_included() to choose a set of licenses with
a blacklisted license and then report failure, even if choosing
another set of licenses would have resulted in a successful
result. This happened when the chosen set still contained more
whitelisted licenses than the other set.
This change makes sure a set with any blacklisted license is always
considered with a lower weight than a set with only whitelisted
licenses.
Example: Faced with the license string "GPL-3.0 & GPL-2.0 & LGPL-2.1 |
Proprietary" and with "GPL-3.0" being blacklisted, the old code would
report a failure since "GPL-3.0 & GPL-2.0 & LGPL-2.1" still contains
more whitelisted licenses than "Proprietary" does.
This change also adds a unit test for oe.license.is_included().
(From OE-Core rev: 312b4d6175e189852c0787ca2fe99b99ce92d1bd)
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta')
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/lib/oe/license.py | 18 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/oelib/license.py | 31 |
2 files changed, 44 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/license.py b/meta/lib/oe/license.py index 8d2fd1709c..ca385d5187 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oe/license.py +++ b/meta/lib/oe/license.py | |||
| @@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ def is_included(licensestr, whitelist=None, blacklist=None): | |||
| 106 | license string matches the whitelist and does not match the blacklist. | 106 | license string matches the whitelist and does not match the blacklist. |
| 107 | 107 | ||
| 108 | Returns a tuple holding the boolean state and a list of the applicable | 108 | Returns a tuple holding the boolean state and a list of the applicable |
| 109 | licenses which were excluded (or None, if the state is True) | 109 | licenses that were excluded if state is False, or the licenses that were |
| 110 | included if the state is True. | ||
| 110 | """ | 111 | """ |
| 111 | 112 | ||
| 112 | def include_license(license): | 113 | def include_license(license): |
| @@ -117,10 +118,17 @@ def is_included(licensestr, whitelist=None, blacklist=None): | |||
| 117 | 118 | ||
| 118 | def choose_licenses(alpha, beta): | 119 | def choose_licenses(alpha, beta): |
| 119 | """Select the option in an OR which is the 'best' (has the most | 120 | """Select the option in an OR which is the 'best' (has the most |
| 120 | included licenses).""" | 121 | included licenses and no excluded licenses).""" |
| 121 | alpha_weight = len(list(filter(include_license, alpha))) | 122 | # The factor 1000 below is arbitrary, just expected to be much larger |
| 122 | beta_weight = len(list(filter(include_license, beta))) | 123 | # that the number of licenses actually specified. That way the weight |
| 123 | if alpha_weight > beta_weight: | 124 | # will be negative if the list of licenses contains an excluded license, |
| 125 | # but still gives a higher weight to the list with the most included | ||
| 126 | # licenses. | ||
| 127 | alpha_weight = (len(list(filter(include_license, alpha))) - | ||
| 128 | 1000 * (len(list(filter(exclude_license, alpha))) > 0)) | ||
| 129 | beta_weight = (len(list(filter(include_license, beta))) - | ||
| 130 | 1000 * (len(list(filter(exclude_license, beta))) > 0)) | ||
| 131 | if alpha_weight >= beta_weight: | ||
| 124 | return alpha | 132 | return alpha |
| 125 | else: | 133 | else: |
| 126 | return beta | 134 | return beta |
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/oelib/license.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/oelib/license.py index bfd9ed9c29..d7f91fb2f4 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/oelib/license.py +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/oelib/license.py | |||
| @@ -66,3 +66,34 @@ class TestComplexCombinations(TestSimpleCombinations): | |||
| 66 | "(GPL-2.0|Proprietary)&BSD-4-clause&MIT": ["GPL-2.0", "BSD-4-clause", "MIT"], | 66 | "(GPL-2.0|Proprietary)&BSD-4-clause&MIT": ["GPL-2.0", "BSD-4-clause", "MIT"], |
| 67 | } | 67 | } |
| 68 | preferred = ["BAR", "OMEGA", "BETA", "GPL-2.0"] | 68 | preferred = ["BAR", "OMEGA", "BETA", "GPL-2.0"] |
| 69 | |||
| 70 | class TestIsIncluded(TestCase): | ||
| 71 | tests = { | ||
| 72 | ("FOO | BAR", None, None): | ||
| 73 | [True, ["FOO"]], | ||
| 74 | ("FOO | BAR", None, "FOO"): | ||
| 75 | [True, ["BAR"]], | ||
| 76 | ("FOO | BAR", "BAR", None): | ||
| 77 | [True, ["BAR"]], | ||
| 78 | ("FOO | BAR & FOOBAR", "*BAR", None): | ||
| 79 | [True, ["BAR", "FOOBAR"]], | ||
| 80 | ("FOO | BAR & FOOBAR", None, "FOO*"): | ||
| 81 | [False, ["FOOBAR"]], | ||
| 82 | ("(FOO | BAR) & FOOBAR | BARFOO", None, "FOO"): | ||
| 83 | [True, ["BAR", "FOOBAR"]], | ||
| 84 | ("(FOO | BAR) & FOOBAR | BAZ & MOO & BARFOO", None, "FOO"): | ||
| 85 | [True, ["BAZ", "MOO", "BARFOO"]], | ||
| 86 | ("GPL-3.0 & GPL-2.0 & LGPL-2.1 | Proprietary", None, None): | ||
| 87 | [True, ["GPL-3.0", "GPL-2.0", "LGPL-2.1"]], | ||
| 88 | ("GPL-3.0 & GPL-2.0 & LGPL-2.1 | Proprietary", None, "GPL-3.0"): | ||
| 89 | [True, ["Proprietary"]], | ||
| 90 | ("GPL-3.0 & GPL-2.0 & LGPL-2.1 | Proprietary", None, "GPL-3.0 Proprietary"): | ||
| 91 | [False, ["GPL-3.0"]] | ||
| 92 | } | ||
| 93 | |||
| 94 | def test_tests(self): | ||
| 95 | for args, expected in self.tests.items(): | ||
| 96 | is_included, licenses = oe.license.is_included( | ||
| 97 | args[0], (args[1] or '').split(), (args[2] or '').split()) | ||
| 98 | self.assertEqual(is_included, expected[0]) | ||
| 99 | self.assertListEqual(licenses, expected[1]) | ||
