cve-check: show real PN/PV

The output currently shows the remapped product and version fields,
which may not be the actual recipe name/version. As this report is about
recipes, use the real values.

(From OE-Core rev: 18827d7f40db4a4f92680bd59ca655cca373ad65)

Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
index 25cefda92e..d843e7c4ac 100644
--- a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass
@@ -208,6 +208,9 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
     """
     from distutils.version import LooseVersion
 
+    pn = d.getVar("PN")
+    real_pv = d.getVar("PV")
+
     cves_unpatched = []
     # CVE_PRODUCT can contain more than one product (eg. curl/libcurl)
     products = d.getVar("CVE_PRODUCT").split()
@@ -217,7 +220,7 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
     pv = d.getVar("CVE_VERSION").split("+git")[0]
 
     # If the recipe has been whitlisted we return empty lists
-    if d.getVar("PN") in d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_PN_WHITELIST").split():
+    if pn in d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_PN_WHITELIST").split():
         bb.note("Recipe has been whitelisted, skipping check")
         return ([], [], [])
 
@@ -286,12 +289,12 @@ def check_cves(d, patched_cves):
                         vulnerable = vulnerable_start or vulnerable_end
 
                 if vulnerable:
-                    bb.note("%s-%s is vulnerable to %s" % (product, pv, cve))
+                    bb.note("%s-%s is vulnerable to %s" % (pn, real_pv, cve))
                     cves_unpatched.append(cve)
                     break
 
             if not vulnerable:
-                bb.note("%s-%s is not vulnerable to %s" % (product, pv, cve))
+                bb.note("%s-%s is not vulnerable to %s" % (pn, real_pv, cve))
                 # TODO: not patched but not vulnerable
                 patched_cves.add(cve)