python3: upgrade 3.12.7 -> 3.12.8

Changelog:
https://docs.python.org/release/3.12.8/whatsnew/changelog.html#python-3-12-8

(From OE-Core rev: 751cf7a576dbb949763703e655e951bcd583f251)

Signed-off-by: Guðni Már Gilbert <gudni.m.g@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/0001-python3-use-cc_basename-to-replace-CC-for-checking-c.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/0001-python3-use-cc_basename-to-replace-CC-for-checking-c.patch
index 7997811228..c9ef409018 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/0001-python3-use-cc_basename-to-replace-CC-for-checking-c.patch
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/0001-python3-use-cc_basename-to-replace-CC-for-checking-c.patch
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-From f834492007487e9e87b3d3f1f3c5cc440e6ec5e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From 82576cdb9d6d9736ba122592974b0e7727216a3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:19:51 +0800
 Subject: [PATCH] python3: use cc_basename to replace CC for checking compiler
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Signed-off-by: Changqing Li <changqing.li@windriver.com>
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
-index d0d5405..093f8b5 100644
+index 9270b5f..955daad 100644
 --- a/configure.ac
 +++ b/configure.ac
 @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([pyconfig.h])
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ index d0d5405..093f8b5 100644
          gcc)    AC_PATH_TOOL([CXX], [g++], [g++], [notfound]) ;;
          cc)     AC_PATH_TOOL([CXX], [c++], [c++], [notfound]) ;;
          clang|*/clang)     AC_PATH_TOOL([CXX], [clang++], [clang++], [notfound]) ;;
-@@ -1328,7 +1329,7 @@ rmdir CaseSensitiveTestDir
+@@ -1331,7 +1332,7 @@ rmdir CaseSensitiveTestDir
  
  case $ac_sys_system in
  hp*|HP*)
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ index d0d5405..093f8b5 100644
      cc|*/cc) CC="$CC -Ae";;
      esac;;
  esac
-@@ -1854,7 +1855,7 @@ esac
+@@ -1857,7 +1858,7 @@ esac
  ],
  [AC_MSG_RESULT([no])])
  if test "$Py_LTO" = 'true' ; then
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ index d0d5405..093f8b5 100644
      *clang*)
        LDFLAGS_NOLTO="-fno-lto"
        dnl Clang linker requires -flto in order to link objects with LTO information.
-@@ -1983,7 +1984,7 @@ then
+@@ -1986,7 +1987,7 @@ then
    fi
  fi
  LLVM_PROF_ERR=no
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ index d0d5405..093f8b5 100644
    *clang*)
      # Any changes made here should be reflected in the GCC+Darwin case below
      PGO_PROF_GEN_FLAG="-fprofile-instr-generate"
-@@ -2155,7 +2156,7 @@ AC_MSG_RESULT([$BOLT_APPLY_FLAGS])
+@@ -2158,7 +2159,7 @@ AC_MSG_RESULT([$BOLT_APPLY_FLAGS])
  # compiler and platform.  BASECFLAGS tweaks need to be made even if the
  # user set OPT.
  
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ index d0d5405..093f8b5 100644
      *clang*)
          cc_is_clang=1
          ;;
-@@ -2427,7 +2428,7 @@ yes)
+@@ -2430,7 +2431,7 @@ yes)
  
      # ICC doesn't recognize the option, but only emits a warning
      ## XXX does it emit an unused result warning and can it be disabled?
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ index d0d5405..093f8b5 100644
              [*icc*], [ac_cv_disable_unused_result_warning=no]
              [PY_CHECK_CC_WARNING([disable], [unused-result])])
      AS_VAR_IF([ac_cv_disable_unused_result_warning], [yes],
-@@ -2673,7 +2674,7 @@ yes)
+@@ -2676,7 +2677,7 @@ yes)
      ;;
  esac
  
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ index d0d5405..093f8b5 100644
  *mpicc*)
      CFLAGS_NODIST="$CFLAGS_NODIST"
      ;;
-@@ -3508,7 +3509,7 @@ then
+@@ -3511,7 +3512,7 @@ then
                 then
                         LINKFORSHARED="-Wl,--export-dynamic"
                 fi;;
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ index d0d5405..093f8b5 100644
                   *gcc*)
                     if $CC -Xlinker --help 2>&1 | grep export-dynamic >/dev/null
                     then
-@@ -6831,7 +6832,7 @@ if test "$ac_cv_gcc_asm_for_x87" = yes; then
+@@ -6832,7 +6833,7 @@ if test "$ac_cv_gcc_asm_for_x87" = yes; then
      # Some versions of gcc miscompile inline asm:
      # http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46491
      # http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-11/msg00366.html