classes/oeqa: Replace subprocess.check_call() with check_output()

If you use subprocess.check_output() the traceback will contain the output
when the command fails which is very useful for debugging. There is no
good reason not to use this everywhere.

(From OE-Core rev: ad750dd1cc9d789abe723daddd098ce41d8547f5)

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/rootfs.py b/meta/lib/oe/rootfs.py
index 5b842ba46a..9c8a0ebb7e 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oe/rootfs.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oe/rootfs.py
@@ -303,10 +303,10 @@ class Rootfs(object, metaclass=ABCMeta):
             bb.note("> Executing %s intercept ..." % script)
 
             try:
-                subprocess.check_call(script_full)
+                subprocess.check_output(script_full)
             except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
-                bb.warn("The postinstall intercept hook '%s' failed (exit code: %d)! See log for details!" %
-                        (script, e.returncode))
+                bb.warn("The postinstall intercept hook '%s' failed (exit code: %d)! See log for details! (Output: %s)" %
+                        (script, e.returncode, e.output))
 
                 with open(script_full) as intercept:
                     registered_pkgs = None