sanity-meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt.bbclass: Fix sanity check

The sanity check was based on the example from meta-security.  However,
the function was not renamed.  This could have caused the meta-security
version to be run instead.

Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@amd.com>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt/classes-global/sanity-meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt.bbclass b/meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt/classes-global/sanity-meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt.bbclass
index 2fa861a2..4234f38b 100644
--- a/meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt/classes-global/sanity-meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt.bbclass
+++ b/meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt/classes-global/sanity-meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt.bbclass
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-addhandler security_bbappend_distrocheck
-security_bbappend_distrocheck[eventmask] = "bb.event.SanityCheck"
-python security_bbappend_distrocheck() {
+addhandler standalone_sdt_bbappend_distrocheck
+standalone_sdt_bbappend_distrocheck[eventmask] = "bb.event.SanityCheck"
+python standalone_sdt_bbappend_distrocheck() {
     skip_check = e.data.getVar('SKIP_META_XILINX_STANDALONE_SDT_SANITY_CHECK') == "1"
     if e.data.getVar('XILINX_WITH_ESW') != 'sdt' and not skip_check:
         bb.warn("You have included the meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt layer, but \
 it has not been enabled using XILINX_WITH_ESW in your configuration. Some \
 bbappend files and preferred version setting may not take effect. See the \
-meta-security README for details on enabling security support.")
+meta-xilinx-standalone-sdt README for details.")
 }