oelint: Suppress inlinesuppress_na, which misreports live suppressionsbackport-2722-to-wrynose

oelint.file.inlinesuppress_na reported all six of this layer's inline
suppressions as unneeded. Each was checked by deleting it and re-scanning:
every one brought back the finding it was said not to suppress, and
optee-os-fslc.inc alone brought back six oelint.var.override errors.

Acting on the rule makes the layer worse, so suppress it layer-wide and
re-evaluate on an oelint-adv newer than 9.11.2.

Signed-off-by: Luciano Dittgen <luciano.dittgen@ossystems.com.br>
(cherry picked from commit 6bb97421c2f75d32bca3e3af0bbf90f927fcc441)

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/.oelint.cfg b/.oelint.cfg
index 13ea9c0f7..881f56a18 100644
--- a/.oelint.cfg
+++ b/.oelint.cfg
@@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
 #     downstream BSP layers; renaming them would break every 'inherit'. oe-core
 #     itself ships dash-named classes (e.g. core-image.bbclass), so the naming
 #     convention this rule enforces does not apply here.
+#   * oelint.file.inlinesuppress_na - reports an inline suppression as unneeded
+#     even when it is load-bearing. All six instances in this layer were checked
+#     by deleting the suppression and re-scanning: every one brought back the
+#     finding it was said not to suppress (optee-os-fslc.inc alone brought back
+#     six oelint.var.override errors). Acting on this rule therefore makes the
+#     layer worse, so it carries no signal here. Re-evaluate on an oelint-adv
+#     newer than 9.11.2; a genuinely stale suppression must be found by hand
+#     until then.
 [oelint]
 release = wrynose
 suppress =
@@ -30,3 +38,4 @@ suppress =
     oelint.var.suggestedvar.CVE_PRODUCT
     oelint.var.suggestedvar.BUGTRACKER
     oelint.bbclass.underscores
+    oelint.file.inlinesuppress_na