| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of having a patch that upstream won't accept, rewrite it in a
upstreamable way and <gasp> submit it upstream.
The fundamental problem is that pkg-config --variable=sdkdir will return the
value of sdkdir literally, whereas --cflags will return -I${sdkdir} *but* will
do sysroot relocation magic on the path so it is usable.
(From OE-Core rev: 4af34cb1193fe86b862566becfb560b3d19155f4)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 77fb72c76c8a5b2229a32f36a913a3293e9d2b56)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The xinerama and dixstruct patches are merged in 1.14.4, so drop them.
Also drop explicit PR statement.
(From OE-Core rev: 60973d0584e2533f0debfcd8e80c5e29beb68e37)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
directory from xserver-xf86-lite recipe
* FILESEXTRAPATHS needs to be in xserver-xf86-lite_1.11.1
because in .inc we don't have ${PV} expanded yet
* crosscompile.patch macro_tweak.patch were identical
* fix_open_max_preprocessor_error.patch has only different header
# $ diff xserver-xorg/fix_open_max_preprocessor_error.patch xserver-xorg-dri/fix_open_max_preprocessor_error.patch
1c1
< Upstream-Status: Pending
---
> Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [embedded specific]
(From OE-Core rev: aaa137f54c246b61a94b62a731de67f09e688a2a)
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
* xserver-xorg is closer to upstream naming and
that's how it's named in OE-classic and meta-oe? It would make meta-oe
transition easier and better to do it now then convert meta-oe to
xserver-xf86 and then rename it back later.
(From OE-Core rev: 0b31c7200a368533df970f0efeb81e2e20c73593)
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
