| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We still have problems where deploying SDKMACHINE=i686 can cause removal
of SDKMACHINE=x86_64 artefacts.
The reason is that x86_64 is a BUILD_ARCH as well as an SDK_ARCH and
the manifest namespaces overlap. To fix this, set PACKAGE_ARCH and
the stamp-extra-into to include SDK_OS. SDK_OS may not be entirely correct
but it is what sstate.bbclass uses for nativesdk and fixing that is
a separate issue.
This is confirmed to resolve artefact problems on the AB which have been
delaying a new uninative release.
(From OE-Core rev: 1dbc6ec4ca061570d2482c9abebcf720298db9b7)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The uninative tarball only contains nativesdk compoents. It should
not get regenerated when MACHINE changes for example. Currently its
sstate arch is also incorrect so changing SDKMACHINE results in other
variants being removed from the deploy directory.
This patch removes the target architecture dependencies so that
deploy artefacts can overlap and it doesn't continually rebuild. This
also fixes various autobuilder/release artefact issues we're having
as a result of these issues.
(From OE-Core rev: 6edd0b8dccc6e1e21f2ef87013e2e0a40d19b0d6)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Otherwise the stamps for x86-64 and i686 uninative tarballs match
and we can't deploy both to the DEPLOYDIR.
(From OE-Core rev: 2a9603759fe87d6326c145f6213ffffeb6afc6ae)
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
under sstate control
Firstly, these recipes are not target (MACHINE) specific so they should
by SDK_ARCH based, not PACKAGE_ARCH.
Also fix use of SDK_DEPLOY -> SDKDEPOLYDIR after other recent changes.
Together these fixes avoid various build failures and ensure the tarballs
only get built once rather than multiple times.
(From OE-Core rev: 894c9b6ded702897ae4084ef75959cdc8cc6f7a3)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
xrange() no longer exists in python 3, use range()
(From OE-Core rev: d022b4335100612d6596cc4c4956cb98ed5873cc)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
(From OE-Core rev: a8181c2d3a9e51569d77ab2ad9950b27a1113294)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So that a single machine can build multiple architectures for the
uninative-tarball respect SDK_ARCH instead of BUILD_ARCH.
This means a x86-64 host can build a i686 uninative-tarball by setting
SDKMACHINE=i686.
(From OE-Core rev: 11b0e7e1cb29fd1fbe06bdb5606a55b92ecdcc89)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(From OE-Core rev: 6211c8060d408134dfa6c00b23b517c439e4c1e7)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This task is meaningless for uninative-tarball as the package task
has been deleted. Besides, sometimes it would cause problems. To
reproduce, use the following command.
bitbake uninative-tarball -c cleansstate && bitbake uninative-tarball &&
bitbake uninative-tarball -c clean && bitbake uninative-tarball
The error is something like below.
File: 'sstate.bbclass', lineno: 33, function: sstate_installpkg
0029: bb.build.exec_func(f, d)
0030:
0031: for state in ss['dirs']:
0032: prepdir(state[1])
*** 0033: os.rename(sstateinst + state[0], state[1])
0034: sstate_install(ss, d)
0035:
0036: for plain in ss['plaindirs']:
0037: workdir = d.getVar('WORKDIR', True)
Exception: OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
[YOCTO #7597]
(From OE-Core rev: 8f905077aaed3dbeeed04787add1cf725fa87bdc)
Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DEPENDS doesn't actually add the dependency on patchelf-native to the
populate_sdk task. SDK_DEPENDS does this, but move the append to after
inheriting the base class so it does not get overwritten.
Without this, uninative-tarball fails to build in a clean workspace on a
system without patchelf.
[YOCTO #7467]
(From OE-Core rev: 0631c2b52432ddf86292351d605b65941d2a8be2)
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hall <tylerwhall@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Randy Witt <randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
uninative.bbclass uses -xjf for decompression so actually run the data
through bzip2.
(From OE-Core rev: 84665b4e894a949591d812f1cdc1745a376bf95f)
Signed-off-by: Randy Witt <randy.e.witt@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
(From OE-Core rev: 2b85b3f33af5157cd4b6f8a6dc737015c85018c3)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
These patches are the start of a new idea, a way of allowing a single set of
cross/native sstate to work over mutliple distros, even old ones.
The assumption is that our own C library is basically up to date. We build
and share a small tarball (~2MB) of a prebuilt copy of this along with a
patchelf binary (which sadly is C++ based so libstdc++ is in there). This
tarball can be generated from our usual SDK generation process through
the supplied recipe, uninative-tarball.
At the start of the build, if its not been extracted into the sysroot, this
tarball is extracted there and configured for the specified path.
When we install binaries from a "uninative" sstate feed, we change the
dynamic loader to point at this dynamic loader and C librbary. This works
exactly the same way as our relocatable SDK does. The only real difference
is a switch to use patchelf, so even if the interpreter section is too small,
it can still adjust the binary.
Right now this implements a working proof of concept. If you build the tarball
and place it at the head of the tree (in COREBASE), you can run a build from
sstate and successfully build packages and construct images.
There is some improvement needed, its hardcoded for x86_64 right now, its trivial
to add 32 bit support too. The tarball isn't fetched right now, there is just a
harcoded path assumption and there is no error handling. I haven't figured
out the best delivery mechanism for that yet. BuildStarted is probably not
the right event to hook on either.
I've merged this to illustrate how with a small change, we might make the
native/cross sstate much more reusable and hence improve the accessibility
of lower overhead builds. With this change, its possible the Yocto Project may
be able to support a configured sstate mirror out the box. This also has
positive implications for our developer workflow/SDK improvements.
(From OE-Core rev: e66c96ae9c7ba21ebd04a4807390f0031238a85a)
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
