1 files changed, 0 insertions, 59 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs/0001-libext2fs-fix-potential-buffer-overflow-in-closefs.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs/0001-libext2fs-fix-potential-buffer-overflow-in-closefs.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index b904e46bda..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs/0001-libext2fs-fix-potential-buffer-overflow-in-closefs.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
-From 49d0fe2a14f2a23da2fe299643379b8c1d37df73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 12:46:39 -0500
-Subject: [PATCH] libext2fs: fix potential buffer overflow in closefs()
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport
-CVE: CVE-2015-1572
-
-The bug fix in f66e6ce4446: "libext2fs: avoid buffer overflow if
-s_first_meta_bg is too big" had a typo in the fix for
-ext2fs_closefs().  In practice most of the security exposure was from
-the openfs path, since this meant if there was a carefully crafted
-file system, buffer overrun would be triggered when the file system was
-opened.
-
-However, if corrupted file system didn't trip over some corruption
-check, and then the file system was modified via tune2fs or debugfs,
-such that the superblock was marked dirty and then written out via the
-closefs() path, it's possible that the buffer overrun could be
-triggered when the file system is closed.
-
-Also clear up a signed vs unsigned warning while we're at it.
-
-Thanks to Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com> for asking me to look at
-compiler warning in the code in question, which led me to notice the
-bug in f66e6ce4446.
-
-Addresses: CVE-2015-1572
-
-Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
----
- lib/ext2fs/closefs.c | 4 ++--
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/closefs.c b/lib/ext2fs/closefs.c
-index 1f99113..ab5b2fb 100644
---- a/lib/ext2fs/closefs.c
-+++ b/lib/ext2fs/closefs.c
-@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_flush2(ext2_filsys fs, int flags)
-        dgrp_t          j;
- #endif
-        char    *group_ptr;
--       int     old_desc_blocks;
-+       blk64_t old_desc_blocks;
-        struct ext2fs_numeric_progress_struct progress;
- 
-        EXT2_CHECK_MAGIC(fs, EXT2_ET_MAGIC_EXT2FS_FILSYS);
-@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_flush2(ext2_filsys fs, int flags)
-        group_ptr = (char *) group_shadow;
-        if (fs->super->s_feature_incompat & EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG) {
-                old_desc_blocks = fs->super->s_first_meta_bg;
--               if (old_desc_blocks > fs->super->s_first_meta_bg)
-+               if (old_desc_blocks > fs->desc_blocks)
-                        old_desc_blocks = fs->desc_blocks;
-        } else
-                old_desc_blocks = fs->desc_blocks;
--- 
-2.1.0
-