1 files changed, 53 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/nfs-utils/nfs-utils/0001-tools-locktest-Use-intmax_t-to-print-off_t.patch b/meta/recipes-connectivity/nfs-utils/nfs-utils/0001-tools-locktest-Use-intmax_t-to-print-off_t.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..7d903e04bc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/nfs-utils/nfs-utils/0001-tools-locktest-Use-intmax_t-to-print-off_t.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+From e2e9251dbeb452f5382179023d8ae18b511167a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
+Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 23:47:08 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] tools/locktest: Use intmax_t to print off_t
+
+off_t could be 64bit on 32bit architectures which means using %z printf
+modifier is not enough to print it and compiler will complain about
+format mismatch
+
+Fixes
+| testlk.c:84:66: error: format '%zd' expects argument of type 'signed size_t', but argument 4 has type '__off64_t' {aka 'long long int'} [-Werror=format=]
+|    84 |                         printf("%s: conflicting lock by %d on (%zd;%zd)\n",
+|       |                                                                ~~^
+|       |                                                                  |
+|       |                                                                  int
+|       |                                                                %lld
+|    85 |                                 fname, fl.l_pid, fl.l_start, fl.l_len);
+|       |                                                  ~~~~~~~~~~
+|       |                                                    |
+|       |                                                    __off64_t {aka long long int}
+
+Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=169035457128067&w=2]
+Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
+---
+ tools/locktest/testlk.c | 5 +++--
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/tools/locktest/testlk.c b/tools/locktest/testlk.c
+index ea51f788..9d4c88c4 100644
+--- a/tools/locktest/testlk.c
++++ b/tools/locktest/testlk.c
+@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
+ #include <config.h>
+ #endif
+ 
++#include <stdint.h>
+ #include <stdlib.h>
+ #include <stdio.h>
+ #include <unistd.h>
+@@ -81,8 +82,8 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
+                if (fl.l_type == F_UNLCK) {
+                        printf("%s: no conflicting lock\n", fname);
+                } else {
+-                       printf("%s: conflicting lock by %d on (%zd;%zd)\n",
+-                               fname, fl.l_pid, fl.l_start, fl.l_len);
++                       printf("%s: conflicting lock by %d on (%jd;%jd)\n",
++                               fname, fl.l_pid, (intmax_t)fl.l_start, (intmax_t)fl.l_len);
+                }
+                return 0;
+        }
+-- 
+2.41.0
+