summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scripts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>2016-09-08 21:49:13 +0100
committerRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2016-09-09 12:07:32 +0100
commitd1303c220e9a64bbfc7b225cf7354b5f7784856d (patch)
treeba1313a640e5dfd1f5583558afdf23cd55d7812e /scripts
parent8a8948e0e1c3851aca7ad514ffc13d8416fca174 (diff)
downloadpoky-d1303c220e9a64bbfc7b225cf7354b5f7784856d.tar.gz
runqemu: fix run from testimage with non-standard DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE
testimage.bbclass uses runqemu to execute runtime tests on a qemu target, this means that bitbake is already running and `bitbake -e` can't be called to obtain bitbake variables. runqemu tries to work around being unable to read values for bitbake variables by inferring the MACHINE from the DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE setting, however if a user sets that variable in a manner which doesn't follow the systems expectations (i.e. if running `bitbake -c testimage` against a directory of pre-generated images in a user-specified path) the inferring of the MACHINE name from the DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE location will fail. It's possible that check_arg_machine() shouldn't cause runqemu to fail and that runqemu should proceed with the user-supplied value even if it can't be verified. This patch simply ensures that a workflow where the user sets DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE continues to work without changing too much of the runqemu code. [YOCTO #10238] (From OE-Core rev: f94ac02f459e2ea0fc471463966997814a67e0ca) Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <joshua.g.lock@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
-rwxr-xr-xscripts/runqemu13
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/runqemu b/scripts/runqemu
index e8d14f5142..91e72cbc50 100755
--- a/scripts/runqemu
+++ b/scripts/runqemu
@@ -277,6 +277,19 @@ class BaseConfig(object):
277 elif self.get('MACHINE') == arg: 277 elif self.get('MACHINE') == arg:
278 return 278 return
279 logger.info('Assuming MACHINE = %s' % arg) 279 logger.info('Assuming MACHINE = %s' % arg)
280
281 # if we're running under testimage, or similarly as a child
282 # of an existing bitbake invocation, we can't invoke bitbake
283 # to validate the MACHINE setting and must assume it's correct...
284 # FIXME: testimage.bbclass exports these two variables into env,
285 # are there other scenarios in which we need to support being
286 # invoked by bitbake?
287 deploy = os.environ.get('DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE', None)
288 bbchild = deploy and os.environ.get('OE_TMPDIR', None)
289 if bbchild:
290 self.set_machine_deploy_dir(arg, deploy)
291 return
292
280 cmd = 'MACHINE=%s bitbake -e' % arg 293 cmd = 'MACHINE=%s bitbake -e' % arg
281 logger.info('Running %s...' % cmd) 294 logger.info('Running %s...' % cmd)
282 self.bitbake_e = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE).stdout.read().decode('utf-8') 295 self.bitbake_e = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE).stdout.read().decode('utf-8')