linux-yocto/6.6: config: x86 tidy & consolidation

Integrating the following commit(s) to linux-yocto/.:

1/3 [
    Author: Paul Gortmaker
    Email: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
    Subject: BSP: remove from all - latencytop feature inclusion
    Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 14:07:48 -0500

    Consider this 5+ year old commit

        commit bcbc7bbc4fb967d8d4ae6333f71b73491a80b94e
        Author: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
        Date:   Thu Mar 1 16:00:41 2018 +0200

        latencytop: remove recipe

        Last commit and release were in 2009; website is down; it's a dead project.

        (From OE-Core rev: 36aae56e7f86a4d5ce93e4528e7dcc42f60c705e)

        Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
        Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
        Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

    Given that, it seems sensible to drop it from default inclusion across
    the BSPs.  I've left the feature itself, so anyone who still cares can
    easily manually add it still.

    Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
    Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
]

2/3 [
    Author: Paul Gortmaker
    Email: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
    Subject: x86-64: separate out the NUMA features to our existing NUMA scc/cfg
    Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 14:07:45 -0500

    A user reported getting NUMA warnings like the ones reported here:

    https://www.suse.com/support/kb/doc/?id=000021040

    "Fail to get numa node for CPU:0 bus:0 dev:0 fn:1"

    ...and repeated for every core on the platform.  Distracting.

    When I asked if it was a crazy big server system with multiple CPU
    sockets and localized RAM near each socket - the answer was "no".

    Turns out they didn't choose NUMA support - rather we did it for them.

    Yocto has been and still remains more "embedded leaning".  That is not
    to say we can't support NUMA.  We just shouldn't be enabling it by
    default in the base x86-64 config fragment that everyone uses.

    Move the two NUMA settings that were not in our existing numa.cfg
    feature out of the BSP and into the feature.

    Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
    Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
]

3/3 [
    Author: Paul Gortmaker
    Email: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
    Subject: x86-64: consolidate crypto options
    Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 14:07:44 -0500

    No functional change - just makes further reorganizations and
    refactoring more easy to review/parse.

    Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
    Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
]

(From OE-Core rev: e8ffc63f3ed61cc31c3077741f3f96dae9baa3fb)

Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions