gdb: upgrade 13.1 -> 13.2

(From OE-Core rev: d10764916624f61d39cb9ea368359837156ad960)

Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alex@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

6 files changed, 1 insertions, 313 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian_13.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian_13.2.bb
index 4ab2b7156d..4ab2b7156d 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian_13.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross-canadian_13.2.bb
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross_13.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross_13.2.bb
index 3b654a2f0d..3b654a2f0d 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross_13.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-cross_13.2.bb
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb.inc
index 8589de62ff..e986b1a1f9 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb.inc
@@ -13,10 +13,8 @@ SRC_URI = "${GNU_MIRROR}/gdb/gdb-${PV}.tar.xz \
            file://0006-resolve-restrict-keyword-conflict.patch \
            file://0007-Fix-invalid-sigprocmask-call.patch \
            file://0008-Define-alignof-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newe.patch \
-           file://0009-gdbserver-linux-low.cc-Fix-a-typo-in-ternary-operato.patch \
            file://add-missing-ldflags.patch \
-           file://0001-aarch64-Check-for-valid-inferior-thread-regcache-bef.patch \
            "
-SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "115ad5c18d69a6be2ab15882d365dda2a2211c14f480b3502c6eba576e2e95a0"
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "fd5bebb7be1833abdb6e023c2f498a354498281df9d05523d8915babeb893f0a"
 
 TOOLCHAIN = "gcc"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb/0001-aarch64-Check-for-valid-inferior-thread-regcache-bef.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb/0001-aarch64-Check-for-valid-inferior-thread-regcache-bef.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 9adf4a4db5..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb/0001-aarch64-Check-for-valid-inferior-thread-regcache-bef.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,286 +0,0 @@
-From b3eff3e15576229af9bae026c5c23ee694b90389 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 07:58:38 +0000
-Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: Check for valid inferior thread/regcache before
- reading pauth registers
-
-Upstream-Status: Backport
-Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com>
-
-There were reports of gdb throwing internal errors when calling
-inferior_thread ()/get_current_regcache () on a system with
-Pointer Authentication enabled.
-
-In such cases, gdb produces the following backtrace, or a variation
-of it (for gdb's with the non-address removal implemented only in
-the aarch64-linux-tdep.c file).
-
-../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/thread.c:86: internal-error: inferior_thread: Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed.
-A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
-further debugging may prove unreliable.
------ Backtrace -----
-0xaaaae04a571f gdb_internal_backtrace_1
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/bt-utils.c:122
-0xaaaae04a57f3 _Z22gdb_internal_backtracev
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/bt-utils.c:168
-0xaaaae0b52ccf internal_vproblem
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/utils.c:401
-0xaaaae0b5310b _Z15internal_verrorPKciS0_St9__va_list
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/utils.c:481
-0xaaaae0e24b8f _Z18internal_error_locPKciS0_z
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/errors.cc:58
-0xaaaae0a88983 _Z15inferior_threadv
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/thread.c:86
-0xaaaae0956c87 _Z20get_current_regcachev
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/regcache.c:428
-0xaaaae035223f aarch64_remove_non_address_bits
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c:3572
-0xaaaae03e8abb _Z31gdbarch_remove_non_address_bitsP7gdbarchm
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/gdbarch.c:3109
-0xaaaae0a692d7 memory_xfer_partial
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:1620
-0xaaaae0a695e3 _Z19target_xfer_partialP10target_ops13target_objectPKcPhPKhmmPm
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:1684
-0xaaaae0a69e9f target_read_partial
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:1937
-0xaaaae0a69fdf _Z11target_readP10target_ops13target_objectPKcPhml
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:1977
-0xaaaae0a69937 _Z18target_read_memorymPhl
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:1773
-0xaaaae08be523 ps_xfer_memory
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/proc-service.c:90
-0xaaaae08be6db ps_pdread
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/proc-service.c:124
-0x40001ed7c3b3 _td_fetch_value
-        /build/glibc-RIFKjK/glibc-2.31/nptl_db/fetch-value.c:115
-0x40001ed791ef td_ta_map_lwp2thr
-        /build/glibc-RIFKjK/glibc-2.31/nptl_db/td_ta_map_lwp2thr.c:194
-0xaaaae07f4473 thread_from_lwp
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/linux-thread-db.c:413
-0xaaaae07f6d6f _ZN16thread_db_target4waitE6ptid_tP17target_waitstatus10enum_flagsI16target_wait_flagE
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/linux-thread-db.c:1420
-0xaaaae0a6b33b _Z11target_wait6ptid_tP17target_waitstatus10enum_flagsI16target_wait_flagE
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/target.c:2586
-0xaaaae0789cf7 do_target_wait_1
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/infrun.c:3825
-0xaaaae0789e6f operator()
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/infrun.c:3884
-0xaaaae078a167 do_target_wait
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/infrun.c:3903
-0xaaaae078b0af _Z20fetch_inferior_eventv
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/infrun.c:4314
-0xaaaae076652f _Z22inferior_event_handler19inferior_event_type
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/inf-loop.c:41
-0xaaaae07dc68b handle_target_event
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/linux-nat.c:4206
-0xaaaae0e25fbb handle_file_event
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:573
-0xaaaae0e264f3 gdb_wait_for_event
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:694
-0xaaaae0e24f9b _Z16gdb_do_one_eventi
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:217
-0xaaaae080f033 start_event_loop
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:411
-0xaaaae080f1b7 captured_command_loop
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:475
-0xaaaae0810b97 captured_main
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:1318
-0xaaaae0810c1b _Z8gdb_mainP18captured_main_args
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/main.c:1337
-0xaaaae0338453 main
-        ../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/gdb.c:32
----------------------
-../../../repos/binutils-gdb/gdb/thread.c:86: internal-error: inferior_thread: Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed.
-A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
-further debugging may prove unreliable.
-Quit this debugging session? (y or n)
-
-We also see failures across the testsuite if the tests get executed on a target
-that has native support for the pointer authentication feature. But
-gdb.base/break.exp and gdb.base/access-mem-running.exp are two examples of
-tests that run into errors and internal errors.
-
-This issue started after commit d88cb738e6a7a7179dfaff8af78d69250c852af1, which
-enabled more broad use of pointer authentication masks to remove non-address
-bits of pointers, but wasn't immediately detected because systems with native
-support for pointer authentication are not that common yet.
-
-The above crash happens because gdb is in the middle of handling an event,
-and do_target_wait_1 calls switch_to_inferior_no_thread, nullifying the
-current thread.  This means a call to inferior_thread () will assert, and
-attempting to call get_current_regcache () will also call inferior_thread (),
-resulting in an assertion as well.
-
-target_has_registers was one function that seemed useful for detecting these
-types of situation where we don't have a register cache. The problem with that
-is the inconsistent state of inferior_ptid, which is used by
-target_has_registers.
-
-Despite the call to switch_to_no_thread in switch_to_inferior_no_thread from
-do_target_wait_1 in the backtrace above clearing inferior_ptid, the call to
-ps_xfer_memory sets inferior_ptid momentarily before reading memory:
-
-static ps_err_e
-ps_xfer_memory (const struct ps_prochandle *ph, psaddr_t addr,
-                gdb_byte *buf, size_t len, int write)
-{
-  scoped_restore_current_inferior restore_inferior;
-  set_current_inferior (ph->thread->inf);
-
-  scoped_restore_current_program_space restore_current_progspace;
-  set_current_program_space (ph->thread->inf->pspace);
-
-  scoped_restore save_inferior_ptid = make_scoped_restore (&inferior_ptid);
-  inferior_ptid = ph->thread->ptid;
-
-  CORE_ADDR core_addr = ps_addr_to_core_addr (addr);
-
-  int ret;
-  if (write)
-    ret = target_write_memory (core_addr, buf, len);
-  else
-    ret = target_read_memory (core_addr, buf, len);
-  return (ret == 0 ? PS_OK : PS_ERR);
-}
-
-Maybe this shouldn't happen, or maybe it is just an unfortunate state to be
-in. But this prevents the use of target_has_registers to guard against the
-lack of registers, since, although current_thread_ is still nullptr,
-inferior_ptid is valid and is not null_ptid.
-
-There is another crash scenario after we kill a previously active inferior, in
-which case the gdbarch will still say we support pointer authentication but we
-will also have no current thread (inferior_thread () will assert etc).
-
-If the target has support for pointer authentication, gdb needs to use
-a couple (or 4, for bare-metal) mask registers to mask off some bits of
-pointers, and for that it needs to access the registers.
-
-At some points, like the one from the backtrace above, there is no active
-thread/current regcache because gdb is in the middle of doing event handling
-and switching between threads.
-
-Simon suggested the use of inferior_ptid to fetch the register cache, as
-opposed to relying on the current register cache.  Though we need to make sure
-inferior_ptid is valid (not null_ptid), I think this works nicely.
-
-With inferior_ptid, we can do safety checks along the way, making sure we have
-a thread to fetch a register cache from and checking if the thread is actually
-stopped or running.
-
-The following patch implements this idea with safety checks to make sure we
-don't run into assertions or errors.  If any of the checks fail, we fallback to
-using a default mask to remove non-address bits of a pointer.
-
-I discussed with Pedro the possibility of caching the mask register values
-(which are per-process and can change mid-execution), but there isn't a good
-spot to cache those values. Besides, the mask registers can change constantly
-for bare-metal debugging when switching between exception levels.
-
-In some cases, it is just not possible to get access to these mask registers,
-like the case where threads are running. In those cases, using a default mask
-to remove the non-address bits should be enough.
-
-This can happen when we let threads run in the background and then we attempt
-to access a memory address (now that gdb is capable of reading memory even
-with threads running).  Thus gdb will attempt to remove non-address bits
-of that memory access, will attempt to access registers, running into errors.
-
-Regression-tested on aarch64-linux Ubuntu 20.04.
----
- gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c b/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c
-index 20a041c599e..4b2915b8e99 100644
---- a/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c
-+++ b/gdb/aarch64-linux-tdep.c
-@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@
- #include "elf/common.h"
- #include "elf/aarch64.h"
- 
-+/* For inferior_ptid and current_inferior ().  */
-+#include "inferior.h"
-+
- /* Signal frame handling.
- 
-       +------------+  ^
-@@ -1986,29 +1989,60 @@ aarch64_linux_decode_memtag_section (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
- static CORE_ADDR
- aarch64_remove_non_address_bits (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR pointer)
- {
--  aarch64_gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep<aarch64_gdbarch_tdep> (gdbarch);
--
-   /* By default, we assume TBI and discard the top 8 bits plus the VA range
--     select bit (55).  */
-+     select bit (55).  Below we try to fetch information about pointer
-+     authentication masks in order to make non-address removal more
-+     precise.  */
-   CORE_ADDR mask = AARCH64_TOP_BITS_MASK;
- 
--  if (tdep->has_pauth ())
-+  /* Check if we have an inferior first.  If not, just use the default
-+     mask.
-+
-+     We use the inferior_ptid here because the pointer authentication masks
-+     should be the same across threads of a process.  Since we may not have
-+     access to the current thread (gdb may have switched to no inferiors
-+     momentarily), we use the inferior ptid.  */
-+  if (inferior_ptid != null_ptid)
-     {
--      /* Fetch the PAC masks.  These masks are per-process, so we can just
--        fetch data from whatever thread we have at the moment.
-+      /* If we do have an inferior, attempt to fetch its thread's thread_info
-+        struct.  */
-+      thread_info *thread
-+       = find_thread_ptid (current_inferior ()->process_target (),
-+                           inferior_ptid);
- 
--        Also, we have both a code mask and a data mask.  For now they are the
--        same, but this may change in the future.  */
--      struct regcache *regs = get_current_regcache ();
--      CORE_ADDR cmask, dmask;
-+      /* If the thread is running, we will not be able to fetch the mask
-+        registers.  */
-+      if (thread != nullptr && thread->state != THREAD_RUNNING)
-+       {
-+         /* Otherwise, fetch the register cache and the masks.  */
-+         struct regcache *regs
-+           = get_thread_regcache (current_inferior ()->process_target (),
-+                                  inferior_ptid);
-+
-+         /* Use the gdbarch from the register cache to check for pointer
-+            authentication support, as it matches the features found in
-+            that particular thread.  */
-+         aarch64_gdbarch_tdep *tdep
-+           = gdbarch_tdep<aarch64_gdbarch_tdep> (regs->arch ());
-+
-+         /* Is there pointer authentication support?  */
-+         if (tdep->has_pauth ())
-+           {
-+             /* We have both a code mask and a data mask.  For now they are
-+                the same, but this may change in the future.  */
-+             CORE_ADDR cmask, dmask;
- 
--      if (regs->cooked_read (tdep->pauth_reg_base, &dmask) != REG_VALID)
--       dmask = mask;
-+             if (regs->cooked_read (tdep->pauth_reg_base, &dmask)
-+                 != REG_VALID)
-+               dmask = mask;
- 
--      if (regs->cooked_read (tdep->pauth_reg_base + 1, &cmask) != REG_VALID)
--       cmask = mask;
-+             if (regs->cooked_read (tdep->pauth_reg_base + 1, &cmask)
-+                 != REG_VALID)
-+               cmask = mask;
- 
--      mask |= aarch64_mask_from_pac_registers (cmask, dmask);
-+             mask |= aarch64_mask_from_pac_registers (cmask, dmask);
-+           }
-+       }
-     }
- 
-   return aarch64_remove_top_bits (pointer, mask);
--- 
-2.34.1
-
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb/0009-gdbserver-linux-low.cc-Fix-a-typo-in-ternary-operato.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb/0009-gdbserver-linux-low.cc-Fix-a-typo-in-ternary-operato.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 32eba089bc..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb/0009-gdbserver-linux-low.cc-Fix-a-typo-in-ternary-operato.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-From 9a85132c4ba7d37a5df146239b3ab1a5854ce478 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 16:24:07 -0800
-Subject: [PATCH] gdbserver/linux-low.cc: Fix a typo in ternary operator
-
-Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-February/197298.html]
-Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
----
- gdbserver/linux-low.cc | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/gdbserver/linux-low.cc b/gdbserver/linux-low.cc
-index 7e1de397893..95ec871d436 100644
---- a/gdbserver/linux-low.cc
-+++ b/gdbserver/linux-low.cc
-@@ -5390,7 +5390,7 @@ proc_xfer_memory (CORE_ADDR memaddr, unsigned char *readbuf,
-       if (lseek (fd, memaddr, SEEK_SET) != -1)
-        bytes = (readbuf != nullptr
-                 ? read (fd, readbuf, len)
--                ? write (fd, writebuf, len));
-+                : write (fd, writebuf, len));
- #endif
- 
-       if (bytes < 0)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb_13.1.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb_13.2.bb
index 9c6db4ca2c..9c6db4ca2c 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb_13.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb_13.2.bb