flex: upgrade to 2.6.2

Patches dropped as they are merged upstream:
- CVE-2016-6354.patch
- 0002-avoid-c-comments-in-c-code-fails-with-gcc-6.patch
- do_not_create_pdf_doc.patch

Apply a patch from github to simplify cross-compilation and not need a
flex-native to bootstrap.

(From OE-Core rev: 3632abd01abb8dfff230e18f828af705da488f97)

Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 64 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/flex/flex/0002-avoid-c-comments-in-c-code-fails-with-gcc-6.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/flex/flex/0002-avoid-c-comments-in-c-code-fails-with-gcc-6.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 438ca5f527..0000000000
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/flex/flex/0002-avoid-c-comments-in-c-code-fails-with-gcc-6.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,64 +0,0 @@
-From 7072befe1397af4eb01c3ff7edf99f0cd5076089 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20M=C3=BCller?= <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:25:32 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] avoid c++ comments in c-code - fails with gcc-6
-MIME-Version: 1.0
-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-
-fixes:
-
-| error: C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C90
-| num_to_alloc = 1; // After all that talk, this was set to 1 anyways...
-
-Upstream-Status: Pending
-
-Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com>
----
- src/flex.skl | 2 +-
- src/scan.c   | 2 +-
- src/skel.c   | 2 +-
- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/src/flex.skl b/src/flex.skl
-index 73a0b9e..ed71627 100644
---- a/src/flex.skl
-+++ b/src/flex.skl
-@@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ void yyFlexLexer::yyensure_buffer_stack(void)
-                 * scanner will even need a stack. We use 2 instead of 1 to avoid an
-                 * immediate realloc on the next call.
-          */
--               num_to_alloc = 1; // After all that talk, this was set to 1 anyways...
-+               num_to_alloc = 1; /* After all that talk, this was set to 1 anyways... */
-                YY_G(yy_buffer_stack) = (struct yy_buffer_state**)yyalloc
-                                                                (num_to_alloc * sizeof(struct yy_buffer_state*)
-                                                                M4_YY_CALL_LAST_ARG);
-diff --git a/src/scan.c b/src/scan.c
-index b55df2d..f1dce75 100644
---- a/src/scan.c
-+++ b/src/scan.c
-@@ -4672,7 +4672,7 @@ static void yyensure_buffer_stack (void)
-                 * scanner will even need a stack. We use 2 instead of 1 to avoid an
-                 * immediate realloc on the next call.
-          */
--               num_to_alloc = 1; // After all that talk, this was set to 1 anyways...
-+               num_to_alloc = 1; /* After all that talk, this was set to 1 anyways...*/
-                (yy_buffer_stack) = (struct yy_buffer_state**)yyalloc
-                                                                (num_to_alloc * sizeof(struct yy_buffer_state*)
-                                                                );
-diff --git a/src/skel.c b/src/skel.c
-index ef657d3..26cc889 100644
---- a/src/skel.c
-+++ b/src/skel.c
-@@ -2561,7 +2561,7 @@ const char *skel[] = {
-   "             * scanner will even need a stack. We use 2 instead of 1 to avoid an",
-   "             * immediate realloc on the next call.",
-   "         */",
--  "            num_to_alloc = 1; // After all that talk, this was set to 1 anyways...",
-+  "            num_to_alloc = 1; /* After all that talk, this was set to 1 anyways... */",
-   "            YY_G(yy_buffer_stack) = (struct yy_buffer_state**)yyalloc",
-   "                                                            (num_to_alloc * sizeof(struct yy_buffer_state*)",
-   "                                                            M4_YY_CALL_LAST_ARG);",
--- 
-2.5.5
-