summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta/lib/oe/patch.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>2018-03-12 18:49:44 +0200
committerRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2018-03-15 06:27:18 -0700
commitcc97bc08125b63821ce3f616771830f77c456f57 (patch)
tree82c68b0a8303a0c85841e3804319de4bfe05f64b /meta/lib/oe/patch.py
parent682705389526fba41ef8763d290ea4cab8787e43 (diff)
downloadpoky-cc97bc08125b63821ce3f616771830f77c456f57.tar.gz
lib/oe/patch.py: add a warning if patch context was ignored
Ignoring patch context increases the chances of patches being applied incorrectly. Depending on what code is being patched, this can go completely unnoticed and create subtle bugs, sometimes with security implications. Please see here for a specific example: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450 On the other hand, we cannot simply force all patch context to match exactly: doing this would break a lot of recipes suddenly, across all layers. So let's try a softer approach: issue a warning, and gently update patches over a longer span of time. When most of the warnings are eliminated, we can start enforcing a strict patch application policy. I do understand that this patch creates a lot of warnings all of a sudden, however I believe the problem does need to be addressed. All of oe-core recipes have their context already fixed. Sample warning: WARNING: vulkan-1.0.61.1-r0 do_patch: Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches. The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool: devtool modify <recipe> devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path> Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace) should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen when some of the context is ignored). Details: Applying patch demos-Don-t-build-tri-or-cube.patch patching file demos/CMakeLists.txt Hunk #1 succeeded at 63 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 76 with fuzz 1 (offset 2 lines). [YOCTO #10450] (From OE-Core rev: 5133fd46bccf14e21680f8d94e952914edccb113) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'meta/lib/oe/patch.py')
-rw-r--r--meta/lib/oe/patch.py16
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/patch.py b/meta/lib/oe/patch.py
index f02dee8d27..bfa7d21879 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oe/patch.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oe/patch.py
@@ -36,6 +36,22 @@ def runcmd(args, dir = None):
36 (exitstatus, output) = oe.utils.getstatusoutput(cmd) 36 (exitstatus, output) = oe.utils.getstatusoutput(cmd)
37 if exitstatus != 0: 37 if exitstatus != 0:
38 raise CmdError(cmd, exitstatus >> 8, output) 38 raise CmdError(cmd, exitstatus >> 8, output)
39 if " fuzz " in output:
40 bb.warn("""
41Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to incorrectly applied patches.
42The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
43
44 devtool modify <recipe>
45 devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
46
47Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
48should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
49and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
50when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
51http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.html
52https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
53Details:
54{}""".format(output))
39 return output 55 return output
40 56
41 finally: 57 finally: