make the documentation a bit more inclusive

Except the name of variables which can't be changed only in the
documentation for obvious reasons and workflow or developement
explanations around the use of the "master" branch which cannot be
replaced with "development" branch instead, most of the non-inclusive
words that appear in https://inclusivenaming.org/word-lists/tier-1/
should have been replaced in this patch.

(From yocto-docs rev: 2755f35060084f7af356091de9dc144f85530fe2)

Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <foss+yocto@0leil.net>
Reviewed-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

2 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/documentation/kernel-dev/advanced.rst b/documentation/kernel-dev/advanced.rst
index 5a6b466ffb..b5290b61b3 100644
--- a/documentation/kernel-dev/advanced.rst
+++ b/documentation/kernel-dev/advanced.rst
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ Organizing Your Source
 ======================
 
 Many recipes based on the ``linux-yocto-custom.bb`` recipe use Linux
-kernel sources that have only a single branch - "master". This type of
+kernel sources that have only a single branch. This type of
 repository structure is fine for linear development supporting a single
 machine and architecture. However, if you work with multiple boards and
 architectures, a kernel source repository with multiple branches is more
@@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ board to boot. Sometimes, these patches are works-in-progress or
 fundamentally wrong, yet they are still necessary for specific boards.
 In these situations, you most likely do not want to include these
 patches in every kernel you build (i.e. have the patches as part of the
-lone "master" branch). It is situations like these that give rise to
+default branch). It is situations like these that give rise to
 multiple branches used within a Linux kernel sources Git repository.
 
 Here are repository organization strategies maximizing source reuse,
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ Machine Branches
 When you have multiple machines and architectures to support, or you are
 actively working on board support, it is more efficient to create
 branches in the repository based on individual machines. Having machine
-branches allows common source to remain in the "master" branch with any
+branches allows common source to remain in the development branch with any
 features specific to a machine stored in the appropriate machine branch.
 This organization method frees you from continually reintegrating your
 patches into a feature.
diff --git a/documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst b/documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst
index cf2e75d853..910318e0f9 100644
--- a/documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst
+++ b/documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst
@@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ view, there is a linear path that travels from the baseline
 ``kernel.org``, through a select group of features and ends with their
 BSP-specific commits. In other words, the divisions of the kernel are
 transparent and are not relevant to the developer on a day-to-day basis.
-From the developer's perspective, this path is the "master" branch in
-Git terms. The developer does not need to be aware of the existence of
+From the developer's perspective, this path is the development branch.
+The developer does not need to be aware of the existence of
 any other branches at all. Of course, it can make sense to have these
 branches in the tree, should a person decide to explore them. For
 example, a comparison between two BSPs at either the commit level or at