summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>2020-07-09 09:06:15 +0200
committerRichard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>2020-07-16 22:28:40 +0100
commit5a63668dbbc410489ac6a88cb79e1a265cde77ac (patch)
tree7002a1169b09d5b143aec63fa7e29731bd9e19e4
parent0783727c5cab10018a5e45af6b2e3f81942fa916 (diff)
downloadpoky-5a63668dbbc410489ac6a88cb79e1a265cde77ac.tar.gz
coreutils: don't split stdbuf to own package with single-binary
Commit 992cec44 (coreutils: Move stdbuf into an own package coreutils-stdbuf) breaks package-qa when the single-binary PACKAGECONFIG is used: ERROR: coreutils-8.32-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/bin/stdbuf contained in package coreutils-stdbuf requires /usr/bin/coreutils, but no providers found in RDEPENDS_coreutils-stdbuf? [file-rdeps] ERROR: coreutils-8.32-r0 do_package_qa: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them. With that PACKAGECONFIG, /usr/bin/stdbuf is just a simple "script" containing the single line #!/usr/bin/coreutils --coreutils-prog-shebang=stdbuf Since there's no point splitting stdbuf to its own package when all the functionality is in the single big coreutils binary anyway, fix this by not creating the separate stdbuf package for the single-binary case. But also make sure that the coreutils-stdbuf item always exists so recipes can always RDEPEND on coreutils-stdbuf. (From OE-Core rev: c2ad3af9da9bb3a98c1d5d1b3d21eb8db643c189) Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> (cherry picked from commit 74d24b5b895198898944260136d05e991a203c11) Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.31.bb15
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.31.bb b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.31.bb
index 2b196b7512..0c8452da98 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.31.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/coreutils/coreutils_8.31.bb
@@ -59,9 +59,20 @@ base_bindir_progs = "cat chgrp chmod chown cp date dd echo false hostname kill l
59 59
60sbindir_progs= "chroot" 60sbindir_progs= "chroot"
61 61
62PACKAGE_BEFORE_PN_class-target += "coreutils-stdbuf" 62# Split stdbuf into its own package, so one can include
63# coreutils-stdbuf without getting the rest of coreutils, but make
64# coreutils itself pull in stdbuf, so IMAGE_INSTALL += "coreutils"
65# always provides all coreutils
66PACKAGE_BEFORE_PN_class-target += "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'single-binary', '', 'coreutils-stdbuf', d)}"
63FILES_coreutils-stdbuf = "${bindir}/stdbuf ${libdir}/coreutils/libstdbuf.so" 67FILES_coreutils-stdbuf = "${bindir}/stdbuf ${libdir}/coreutils/libstdbuf.so"
64RDEPENDS_coreutils_class-target += "coreutils-stdbuf" 68RDEPENDS_coreutils_class-target += "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'single-binary', '', 'coreutils-stdbuf', d)}"
69
70# However, when the single-binary PACKAGECONFIG is used, stdbuf
71# functionality is built into the single coreutils binary, so there's
72# no point splitting /usr/bin/stdbuf to its own package. Instead, add
73# an RPROVIDE so that rdepending on coreutils-stdbuf will work
74# regardless of whether single-binary is in effect.
75RPROVIDES_coreutils += "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG', 'single-binary', 'coreutils-stdbuf', '', d)}"
65 76
66# Let aclocal use the relative path for the m4 file rather than the 77# Let aclocal use the relative path for the m4 file rather than the
67# absolute since coreutils has a lot of m4 files, otherwise there might 78# absolute since coreutils has a lot of m4 files, otherwise there might