xen: upgrade 4.9.x recipe to 4.9.1 and apply XSA/CVE fix patches

Upgrade the Xen 4.9.x series recipe to latest 4.9.1

and apply patches for:
    XSA-245 / CVE-2017-17046
    XSA-246 / CVE-2017-17044
    XSA-247 / CVE-2017-17045
    XSA-248 / CVE-2017-17566
    XSA-249 / CVE-2017-17563
    XSA-250 / CVE-2017-17564
    XSA-251 / CVE-2017-17565

Signed-off-by: Christopher Clark <christopher.clark6@baesystems.com>
Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>

1 files changed, 67 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/recipes-extended/xen/files/xsa250.patch b/recipes-extended/xen/files/xsa250.patch
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..26aeb33f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-extended/xen/files/xsa250.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
+Subject: x86/shadow: fix ref-counting error handling
+
+The old-Linux handling in shadow_set_l4e() mistakenly ORed together the
+results of sh_get_ref() and sh_pin(). As the latter failing is not a
+correctness problem, simply ignore its return value.
+
+In sh_set_toplevel_shadow() a failing sh_get_ref() must not be
+accompanied by installing the entry, despite the domain being crashed.
+
+This is XSA-250.
+
+Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
+Reviewed-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
+
+--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
++++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
+@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static int shadow_set_l4e(struct domain
+                           shadow_l4e_t new_sl4e,
+                           mfn_t sl4mfn)
+ {
+-    int flags = 0, ok;
++    int flags = 0;
+     shadow_l4e_t old_sl4e;
+     paddr_t paddr;
+     ASSERT(sl4e != NULL);
+@@ -938,15 +938,16 @@ static int shadow_set_l4e(struct domain
+     {
+         /* About to install a new reference */
+         mfn_t sl3mfn = shadow_l4e_get_mfn(new_sl4e);
+-        ok = sh_get_ref(d, sl3mfn, paddr);
+-        /* Are we pinning l3 shadows to handle wierd linux behaviour? */
+-        if ( sh_type_is_pinnable(d, SH_type_l3_64_shadow) )
+-            ok |= sh_pin(d, sl3mfn);
+-        if ( !ok )
++
++        if ( !sh_get_ref(d, sl3mfn, paddr) )
+         {
+             domain_crash(d);
+             return SHADOW_SET_ERROR;
+         }
++
++        /* Are we pinning l3 shadows to handle weird Linux behaviour? */
++        if ( sh_type_is_pinnable(d, SH_type_l3_64_shadow) )
++            sh_pin(d, sl3mfn);
+     }
+ 
+     /* Write the new entry */
+@@ -3965,14 +3966,15 @@ sh_set_toplevel_shadow(struct vcpu *v,
+ 
+     /* Take a ref to this page: it will be released in sh_detach_old_tables()
+      * or the next call to set_toplevel_shadow() */
+-    if ( !sh_get_ref(d, smfn, 0) )
++    if ( sh_get_ref(d, smfn, 0) )
++        new_entry = pagetable_from_mfn(smfn);
++    else
+     {
+         SHADOW_ERROR("can't install %#lx as toplevel shadow\n", mfn_x(smfn));
+         domain_crash(d);
++        new_entry = pagetable_null();
+     }
+ 
+-    new_entry = pagetable_from_mfn(smfn);
+-
+  install_new_entry:
+     /* Done.  Install it */
+     SHADOW_PRINTK("%u/%u [%u] gmfn %#"PRI_mfn" smfn %#"PRI_mfn"\n",