blob: 5927c50d4ee67396adee53ab70dfca398d716fd5 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
|
From 4fd5dc9eece297f49f16f82422ead3a28b11ea70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:23:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] KEYS: ensure we free the assoc array edit if edit is valid
commit ca4da5dd1f99fe9c59f1709fb43e818b18ad20e0 upstream.
__key_link_end is not freeing the associated array edit structure
and this leads to a 512 byte memory leak each time an identical
existing key is added with add_key().
The reason the add_key() system call returns okay is that
key_create_or_update() calls __key_link_begin() before checking to see
whether it can update a key directly rather than adding/replacing - which
it turns out it can. Thus __key_link() is not called through
__key_instantiate_and_link() and __key_link_end() must cancel the edit.
CVE-2015-1333
Upstream-Status: Backport
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sona Sarmadi <sona.sarmadi@enea.com>
---
security/keys/keyring.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/keys/keyring.c b/security/keys/keyring.c
index e72548b..d334370 100644
--- a/security/keys/keyring.c
+++ b/security/keys/keyring.c
@@ -1181,9 +1181,11 @@ void __key_link_end(struct key *keyring,
if (index_key->type == &key_type_keyring)
up_write(&keyring_serialise_link_sem);
- if (edit && !edit->dead_leaf) {
- key_payload_reserve(keyring,
- keyring->datalen - KEYQUOTA_LINK_BYTES);
+ if (edit) {
+ if (!edit->dead_leaf) {
+ key_payload_reserve(keyring,
+ keyring->datalen - KEYQUOTA_LINK_BYTES);
+ }
assoc_array_cancel_edit(edit);
}
up_write(&keyring->sem);
--
1.9.1
|
