tools/git-repo.git/subcmds/prune.py, branch v2.7

Fix blank line issues reported by flake8

2020-02-12T06:36:40+00:00

- E301 expected 1 blank line - E302 expected 2 blank lines - E303 too many blank lines - E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition - E306 expected 1 blank line before a nested definition Fixed automatically with autopep8: git ls-files | grep py$ | xargs autopep8 --in-place \ --select E301,E302,E303,E305,E306 Manually fix issues in project.py caused by misuse of block comments. Change-Id: Iee840fcaff48aae504ddac9c3e76d2acd484f6a9 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/254599 Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger Tested-by: David Pursehouse

prune: handle branches that track missing branches

2019-11-16T19:55:02+00:00

Series of steps: * Create a local "b1" branch with `repo start b1` that tracks a remote branch (totally fine) * Manually create a local "b2" branch with `git branch --track b1 b2` that tracks the local "b1" (uh-oh...) * Delete the local "b1" branch manually or via `repo prune` (....) * Try to process the "b2" branch with `repo prune` Since b2 tracks a branch that no longer exists, everything blows up at this point as we try to probe the non-existent ref. Instead, we should flag this as unknown and leave it up to the user to resolve. This probably could come up if a local branch was tracking a remote branch that was deleted from the server, and users ran something like `repo sync --prune` which cleaned up the remote refs. Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/11485 Change-Id: I6b6b6041943944b8efa6e2ad0b8b10f13a75a5c2 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/236793 Reviewed-by: David Pursehouse Reviewed-by: Kirtika Ruchandani Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger Tested-by: Mike Frysinger

set default file encoding to utf-8

2019-06-13T14:30:52+00:00

There's no reason to support any other encoding in these files. This only affects the files themselves and not streams they open. Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/10418 Change-Id: I053cb40cd3666ce5c8a0689b9dd938f24ca765bf

Change print statements to work in python3

2012-11-14T01:33:56+00:00

This is part of a series of changes to introduce Python3 support. Change-Id: I373be5de7141aa127d7debdbce1df39148dbec32

Coding style cleanup

2012-10-09T10:45:30+00:00

Fix the following issues reported by pylint: C0321: More than one statement on a single line W0622: Redefining built-in 'name' W0612: Unused variable 'name' W0613: Unused argument 'name' W0102: Dangerous default value 'value' as argument W0105: String statement has no effect Also fixed a few cases of inconsistent indentation. Change-Id: Ie0db839e7c57d576cff12d8c055fe87030d00744

Initial Contribution

2008-10-21T14:00:00+00:00