From 2d031b7e2ab983fe3738f1f585df7058150cca99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Purdie Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 13:03:07 +0100 Subject: lzo: Add further info to a patch and mark as Inactive-Upstream Add some further info to the patch based on upstream changes. Given the last release in 2017 and glaring issues on at least armv5, it does raise the question on whether we should drop this. There are probably better compression tools now. (From OE-Core rev: 27815774c983f7c2c849513efe087a6d77eaf443) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie (cherry picked from commit 241309c6dec364445093fa5973cc8998431cbed9) Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- .../lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'meta') diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch index db3a70e803..a0d2502d24 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch @@ -10,7 +10,15 @@ Change suggested by Julian Taylor. Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757037 -Upstream-Status: Pending +RP: Patch is still in debian as of 20220524 in a revised form: +https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/ +https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/0001-Conditionally-replace-reinvention-of-memcpy-with-cal.patch/ +It was submitted in 2015, no reply to an email from RP in 2022 either. + +We likely need this in OE to prevent against unaligned accesses +on systems such as armv5. + +Upstream-Status: Inactive-Upstream Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- minilzo/minilzo.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf