From 5406ff0bc60cbc026d36cb3458c5913faf0f1017 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Kanavin Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 07:42:13 -0800 Subject: libusb1: upgrade 1.0.26 -> 1.0.27 (From OE-Core rev: 4d371bc44735c4e30f454b3522f785df6687a164) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- ...c-Link-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch | 46 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 46 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1/0001-configure.ac-Link-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch (limited to 'meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1') diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1/0001-configure.ac-Link-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch b/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1/0001-configure.ac-Link-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 3c223e0822..0000000000 --- a/meta/recipes-support/libusb/libusb1/0001-configure.ac-Link-with-latomic-only-if-no-atomic-bui.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,46 +0,0 @@ -From 95e601ce116dd46ea7915c171976b85ea0905d58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Lonnie Abelbeck -Date: Sun, 8 May 2022 14:05:56 -0500 -Subject: [PATCH] configure.ac: Link with -latomic only if no atomic builtins - -Follow-up to 561dbda, a check of GCC atomic builtins needs to be done -first. - -I'm no autoconf guru, but using this: -https://github.com/mesa3d/mesa/blob/0df485c285b73c34ba9062f0c27e55c3c702930d/configure.ac#L469 -as inspiration, I created a pre-check before calling AC_SEARCH_LIBS(...) - -Fixes #1135 -Closes #1139 -Upstream-Status: Backport [https://github.com/kraj/libusb/commit/95e601ce116dd46ea7915c171976b85ea0905d58] -Signed-off-by: Khem Raj ---- - configure.ac | 16 +++++++++++++++- - libusb/version_nano.h | 2 +- - 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - ---- a/configure.ac -+++ b/configure.ac -@@ -153,7 +153,21 @@ if test "x$platform" = xposix; then - AC_SEARCH_LIBS([pthread_create], [pthread], - [test "x$ac_cv_search_pthread_create" != "xnone required" && AC_SUBST(THREAD_LIBS, [-lpthread])], - [], []) -- AC_SEARCH_LIBS([__atomic_fetch_add_4], [atomic]) -+ dnl Check for new-style atomic builtins. We first check without linking to -latomic. -+ AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether __atomic_load_n is supported) -+ AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[ -+ #include -+ int main() { -+ struct { -+ uint64_t *v; -+ } x; -+ return (int)__atomic_load_n(x.v, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) & -+ (int)__atomic_add_fetch(x.v, (uint64_t)1, __ATOMIC_ACQ_REL); -+ }]])], GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED=yes, GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED=no) -+ AC_MSG_RESULT($GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED) -+ if test "x$GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_SUPPORTED" != xyes; then -+ AC_SEARCH_LIBS([__atomic_fetch_add_4], [atomic]) -+ fi - elif test "x$platform" = xwindows; then - AC_DEFINE([PLATFORM_WINDOWS], [1], [Define to 1 if compiling for a Windows platform.]) - else -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf