diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.rst | 409 |
1 files changed, 409 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.rst b/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e8addbd307 --- /dev/null +++ b/documentation/kernel-dev/kernel-dev-concepts-appx.rst | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1,409 @@ | |||
| 1 | ************************ | ||
| 2 | Advanced Kernel Concepts | ||
| 3 | ************************ | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | .. _kernel-big-picture: | ||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | Yocto Project Kernel Development and Maintenance | ||
| 8 | ================================================ | ||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | Kernels available through the Yocto Project (Yocto Linux kernels), like | ||
| 11 | other kernels, are based off the Linux kernel releases from | ||
| 12 | ` <http://www.kernel.org>`__. At the beginning of a major Linux kernel | ||
| 13 | development cycle, the Yocto Project team chooses a Linux kernel based | ||
| 14 | on factors such as release timing, the anticipated release timing of | ||
| 15 | final upstream ``kernel.org`` versions, and Yocto Project feature | ||
| 16 | requirements. Typically, the Linux kernel chosen is in the final stages | ||
| 17 | of development by the Linux community. In other words, the Linux kernel | ||
| 18 | is in the release candidate or "rc" phase and has yet to reach final | ||
| 19 | release. But, by being in the final stages of external development, the | ||
| 20 | team knows that the ``kernel.org`` final release will clearly be within | ||
| 21 | the early stages of the Yocto Project development window. | ||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | This balance allows the Yocto Project team to deliver the most | ||
| 24 | up-to-date Yocto Linux kernel possible, while still ensuring that the | ||
| 25 | team has a stable official release for the baseline Linux kernel | ||
| 26 | version. | ||
| 27 | |||
| 28 | As implied earlier, the ultimate source for Yocto Linux kernels are | ||
| 29 | released kernels from ``kernel.org``. In addition to a foundational | ||
| 30 | kernel from ``kernel.org``, the available Yocto Linux kernels contain a | ||
| 31 | mix of important new mainline developments, non-mainline developments | ||
| 32 | (when no alternative exists), Board Support Package (BSP) developments, | ||
| 33 | and custom features. These additions result in a commercially released | ||
| 34 | Yocto Project Linux kernel that caters to specific embedded designer | ||
| 35 | needs for targeted hardware. | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | You can find a web interface to the Yocto Linux kernels in the `Source | ||
| 38 | Repositories <&YOCTO_DOCS_OM_URL;#source-repositories>`__ at | ||
| 39 | ` <&YOCTO_GIT_URL;>`__. If you look at the interface, you will see to | ||
| 40 | the left a grouping of Git repositories titled "Yocto Linux Kernel". | ||
| 41 | Within this group, you will find several Linux Yocto kernels developed | ||
| 42 | and included with Yocto Project releases: | ||
| 43 | |||
| 44 | - *``linux-yocto-4.1``:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with | ||
| 45 | the Yocto Project Release 2.0. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.1 | ||
| 46 | released kernel. | ||
| 47 | |||
| 48 | - *``linux-yocto-4.4``:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with | ||
| 49 | the Yocto Project Release 2.1. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.4 | ||
| 50 | released kernel. | ||
| 51 | |||
| 52 | - *``linux-yocto-4.6``:* A temporary kernel that is not tied to any | ||
| 53 | Yocto Project release. | ||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | - *``linux-yocto-4.8``:* The stable yocto Project kernel to use with | ||
| 56 | the Yocto Project Release 2.2. | ||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | - *``linux-yocto-4.9``:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with | ||
| 59 | the Yocto Project Release 2.3. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.9 | ||
| 60 | released kernel. | ||
| 61 | |||
| 62 | - *``linux-yocto-4.10``:* The default stable Yocto Project kernel to | ||
| 63 | use with the Yocto Project Release 2.3. This kernel is based on the | ||
| 64 | Linux 4.10 released kernel. | ||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | - *``linux-yocto-4.12``:* The default stable Yocto Project kernel to | ||
| 67 | use with the Yocto Project Release 2.4. This kernel is based on the | ||
| 68 | Linux 4.12 released kernel. | ||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | - *``yocto-kernel-cache``:* The ``linux-yocto-cache`` contains patches | ||
| 71 | and configurations for the linux-yocto kernel tree. This repository | ||
| 72 | is useful when working on the linux-yocto kernel. For more | ||
| 73 | information on this "Advanced Kernel Metadata", see the "`Working | ||
| 74 | With Advanced Metadata | ||
| 75 | (``yocto-kernel-cache``) <#kernel-dev-advanced>`__" Chapter. | ||
| 76 | |||
| 77 | - *``linux-yocto-dev``:* A development kernel based on the latest | ||
| 78 | upstream release candidate available. | ||
| 79 | |||
| 80 | .. note:: | ||
| 81 | |||
| 82 | Long Term Support Initiative (LTSI) for Yocto Linux kernels is as | ||
| 83 | follows: | ||
| 84 | |||
| 85 | - For Yocto Project releases 1.7, 1.8, and 2.0, the LTSI kernel is | ||
| 86 | ``linux-yocto-3.14``. | ||
| 87 | |||
| 88 | - For Yocto Project releases 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, the LTSI kernel is | ||
| 89 | ``linux-yocto-4.1``. | ||
| 90 | |||
| 91 | - For Yocto Project release 2.4, the LTSI kernel is | ||
| 92 | ``linux-yocto-4.9`` | ||
| 93 | |||
| 94 | - ``linux-yocto-4.4`` is an LTS kernel. | ||
| 95 | |||
| 96 | Once a Yocto Linux kernel is officially released, the Yocto Project team | ||
| 97 | goes into their next development cycle, or upward revision (uprev) | ||
| 98 | cycle, while still continuing maintenance on the released kernel. It is | ||
| 99 | important to note that the most sustainable and stable way to include | ||
| 100 | feature development upstream is through a kernel uprev process. | ||
| 101 | Back-porting hundreds of individual fixes and minor features from | ||
| 102 | various kernel versions is not sustainable and can easily compromise | ||
| 103 | quality. | ||
| 104 | |||
| 105 | During the uprev cycle, the Yocto Project team uses an ongoing analysis | ||
| 106 | of Linux kernel development, BSP support, and release timing to select | ||
| 107 | the best possible ``kernel.org`` Linux kernel version on which to base | ||
| 108 | subsequent Yocto Linux kernel development. The team continually monitors | ||
| 109 | Linux community kernel development to look for significant features of | ||
| 110 | interest. The team does consider back-porting large features if they | ||
| 111 | have a significant advantage. User or community demand can also trigger | ||
| 112 | a back-port or creation of new functionality in the Yocto Project | ||
| 113 | baseline kernel during the uprev cycle. | ||
| 114 | |||
| 115 | Generally speaking, every new Linux kernel both adds features and | ||
| 116 | introduces new bugs. These consequences are the basic properties of | ||
| 117 | upstream Linux kernel development and are managed by the Yocto Project | ||
| 118 | team's Yocto Linux kernel development strategy. It is the Yocto Project | ||
| 119 | team's policy to not back-port minor features to the released Yocto | ||
| 120 | Linux kernel. They only consider back-porting significant technological | ||
| 121 | jumps DASH and, that is done after a complete gap analysis. The reason | ||
| 122 | for this policy is that back-porting any small to medium sized change | ||
| 123 | from an evolving Linux kernel can easily create mismatches, | ||
| 124 | incompatibilities and very subtle errors. | ||
| 125 | |||
| 126 | The policies described in this section result in both a stable and a | ||
| 127 | cutting edge Yocto Linux kernel that mixes forward ports of existing | ||
| 128 | Linux kernel features and significant and critical new functionality. | ||
| 129 | Forward porting Linux kernel functionality into the Yocto Linux kernels | ||
| 130 | available through the Yocto Project can be thought of as a "micro | ||
| 131 | uprev." The many “micro uprevs” produce a Yocto Linux kernel version | ||
| 132 | with a mix of important new mainline, non-mainline, BSP developments and | ||
| 133 | feature integrations. This Yocto Linux kernel gives insight into new | ||
| 134 | features and allows focused amounts of testing to be done on the kernel, | ||
| 135 | which prevents surprises when selecting the next major uprev. The | ||
| 136 | quality of these cutting edge Yocto Linux kernels is evolving and the | ||
| 137 | kernels are used in leading edge feature and BSP development. | ||
| 138 | |||
| 139 | Yocto Linux Kernel Architecture and Branching Strategies | ||
| 140 | ======================================================== | ||
| 141 | |||
| 142 | As mentioned earlier, a key goal of the Yocto Project is to present the | ||
| 143 | developer with a kernel that has a clear and continuous history that is | ||
| 144 | visible to the user. The architecture and mechanisms, in particular the | ||
| 145 | branching strategies, used achieve that goal in a manner similar to | ||
| 146 | upstream Linux kernel development in ``kernel.org``. | ||
| 147 | |||
| 148 | You can think of a Yocto Linux kernel as consisting of a baseline Linux | ||
| 149 | kernel with added features logically structured on top of the baseline. | ||
| 150 | The features are tagged and organized by way of a branching strategy | ||
| 151 | implemented by the Yocto Project team using the Source Code Manager | ||
| 152 | (SCM) Git. | ||
| 153 | |||
| 154 | .. note:: | ||
| 155 | |||
| 156 | - Git is the obvious SCM for meeting the Yocto Linux kernel | ||
| 157 | organizational and structural goals described in this section. Not | ||
| 158 | only is Git the SCM for Linux kernel development in ``kernel.org`` | ||
| 159 | but, Git continues to grow in popularity and supports many | ||
| 160 | different work flows, front-ends and management techniques. | ||
| 161 | |||
| 162 | - You can find documentation on Git at | ||
| 163 | ` <http://git-scm.com/documentation>`__. You can also get an | ||
| 164 | introduction to Git as it applies to the Yocto Project in the | ||
| 165 | "`Git <&YOCTO_DOCS_OM_URL;#git>`__" section in the Yocto Project | ||
| 166 | Overview and Concepts Manual. The latter reference provides an | ||
| 167 | overview of Git and presents a minimal set of Git commands that | ||
| 168 | allows you to be functional using Git. You can use as much, or as | ||
| 169 | little, of what Git has to offer to accomplish what you need for | ||
| 170 | your project. You do not have to be a "Git Expert" in order to use | ||
| 171 | it with the Yocto Project. | ||
| 172 | |||
| 173 | Using Git's tagging and branching features, the Yocto Project team | ||
| 174 | creates kernel branches at points where functionality is no longer | ||
| 175 | shared and thus, needs to be isolated. For example, board-specific | ||
| 176 | incompatibilities would require different functionality and would | ||
| 177 | require a branch to separate the features. Likewise, for specific kernel | ||
| 178 | features, the same branching strategy is used. | ||
| 179 | |||
| 180 | This "tree-like" architecture results in a structure that has features | ||
| 181 | organized to be specific for particular functionality, single kernel | ||
| 182 | types, or a subset of kernel types. Thus, the user has the ability to | ||
| 183 | see the added features and the commits that make up those features. In | ||
| 184 | addition to being able to see added features, the user can also view the | ||
| 185 | history of what made up the baseline Linux kernel. | ||
| 186 | |||
| 187 | Another consequence of this strategy results in not having to store the | ||
| 188 | same feature twice internally in the tree. Rather, the kernel team | ||
| 189 | stores the unique differences required to apply the feature onto the | ||
| 190 | kernel type in question. | ||
| 191 | |||
| 192 | .. note:: | ||
| 193 | |||
| 194 | The Yocto Project team strives to place features in the tree such | ||
| 195 | that features can be shared by all boards and kernel types where | ||
| 196 | possible. However, during development cycles or when large features | ||
| 197 | are merged, the team cannot always follow this practice. In those | ||
| 198 | cases, the team uses isolated branches to merge features. | ||
| 199 | |||
| 200 | BSP-specific code additions are handled in a similar manner to | ||
| 201 | kernel-specific additions. Some BSPs only make sense given certain | ||
| 202 | kernel types. So, for these types, the team creates branches off the end | ||
| 203 | of that kernel type for all of the BSPs that are supported on that | ||
| 204 | kernel type. From the perspective of the tools that create the BSP | ||
| 205 | branch, the BSP is really no different than a feature. Consequently, the | ||
| 206 | same branching strategy applies to BSPs as it does to kernel features. | ||
| 207 | So again, rather than store the BSP twice, the team only stores the | ||
| 208 | unique differences for the BSP across the supported multiple kernels. | ||
| 209 | |||
| 210 | While this strategy can result in a tree with a significant number of | ||
| 211 | branches, it is important to realize that from the developer's point of | ||
| 212 | view, there is a linear path that travels from the baseline | ||
| 213 | ``kernel.org``, through a select group of features and ends with their | ||
| 214 | BSP-specific commits. In other words, the divisions of the kernel are | ||
| 215 | transparent and are not relevant to the developer on a day-to-day basis. | ||
| 216 | From the developer's perspective, this path is the "master" branch in | ||
| 217 | Git terms. The developer does not need to be aware of the existence of | ||
| 218 | any other branches at all. Of course, value exists in the having these | ||
| 219 | branches in the tree, should a person decide to explore them. For | ||
| 220 | example, a comparison between two BSPs at either the commit level or at | ||
| 221 | the line-by-line code ``diff`` level is now a trivial operation. | ||
| 222 | |||
| 223 | The following illustration shows the conceptual Yocto Linux kernel. | ||
| 224 | |||
| 225 | In the illustration, the "Kernel.org Branch Point" marks the specific | ||
| 226 | spot (or Linux kernel release) from which the Yocto Linux kernel is | ||
| 227 | created. From this point forward in the tree, features and differences | ||
| 228 | are organized and tagged. | ||
| 229 | |||
| 230 | The "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel" contains functionality that is | ||
| 231 | common to every kernel type and BSP that is organized further along in | ||
| 232 | the tree. Placing these common features in the tree this way means | ||
| 233 | features do not have to be duplicated along individual branches of the | ||
| 234 | tree structure. | ||
| 235 | |||
| 236 | From the "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel", branch points represent | ||
| 237 | specific functionality for individual Board Support Packages (BSPs) as | ||
| 238 | well as real-time kernels. The illustration represents this through | ||
| 239 | three BSP-specific branches and a real-time kernel branch. Each branch | ||
| 240 | represents some unique functionality for the BSP or for a real-time | ||
| 241 | Yocto Linux kernel. | ||
| 242 | |||
| 243 | In this example structure, the "Real-time (rt) Kernel" branch has common | ||
| 244 | features for all real-time Yocto Linux kernels and contains more | ||
| 245 | branches for individual BSP-specific real-time kernels. The illustration | ||
| 246 | shows three branches as an example. Each branch points the way to | ||
| 247 | specific, unique features for a respective real-time kernel as they | ||
| 248 | apply to a given BSP. | ||
| 249 | |||
| 250 | The resulting tree structure presents a clear path of markers (or | ||
| 251 | branches) to the developer that, for all practical purposes, is the | ||
| 252 | Yocto Linux kernel needed for any given set of requirements. | ||
| 253 | |||
| 254 | .. note:: | ||
| 255 | |||
| 256 | Keep in mind the figure does not take into account all the supported | ||
| 257 | Yocto Linux kernels, but rather shows a single generic kernel just | ||
| 258 | for conceptual purposes. Also keep in mind that this structure | ||
| 259 | represents the Yocto Project | ||
| 260 | Source Repositories | ||
| 261 | that are either pulled from during the build or established on the | ||
| 262 | host development system prior to the build by either cloning a | ||
| 263 | particular kernel's Git repository or by downloading and unpacking a | ||
| 264 | tarball. | ||
| 265 | |||
| 266 | Working with the kernel as a structured tree follows recognized | ||
| 267 | community best practices. In particular, the kernel as shipped with the | ||
| 268 | product, should be considered an "upstream source" and viewed as a | ||
| 269 | series of historical and documented modifications (commits). These | ||
| 270 | modifications represent the development and stabilization done by the | ||
| 271 | Yocto Project kernel development team. | ||
| 272 | |||
| 273 | Because commits only change at significant release points in the product | ||
| 274 | life cycle, developers can work on a branch created from the last | ||
| 275 | relevant commit in the shipped Yocto Project Linux kernel. As mentioned | ||
| 276 | previously, the structure is transparent to the developer because the | ||
| 277 | kernel tree is left in this state after cloning and building the kernel. | ||
| 278 | |||
| 279 | Kernel Build File Hierarchy | ||
| 280 | =========================== | ||
| 281 | |||
| 282 | Upstream storage of all the available kernel source code is one thing, | ||
| 283 | while representing and using the code on your host development system is | ||
| 284 | another. Conceptually, you can think of the kernel source repositories | ||
| 285 | as all the source files necessary for all the supported Yocto Linux | ||
| 286 | kernels. As a developer, you are just interested in the source files for | ||
| 287 | the kernel on which you are working. And, furthermore, you need them | ||
| 288 | available on your host system. | ||
| 289 | |||
| 290 | Kernel source code is available on your host system several different | ||
| 291 | ways: | ||
| 292 | |||
| 293 | - *Files Accessed While using ``devtool``:* ``devtool``, which is | ||
| 294 | available with the Yocto Project, is the preferred method by which to | ||
| 295 | modify the kernel. See the "`Kernel Modification | ||
| 296 | Workflow <#kernel-modification-workflow>`__" section. | ||
| 297 | |||
| 298 | - *Cloned Repository:* If you are working in the kernel all the time, | ||
| 299 | you probably would want to set up your own local Git repository of | ||
| 300 | the Yocto Linux kernel tree. For information on how to clone a Yocto | ||
| 301 | Linux kernel Git repository, see the "`Preparing the Build Host to | ||
| 302 | Work on the | ||
| 303 | Kernel <#preparing-the-build-host-to-work-on-the-kernel>`__" section. | ||
| 304 | |||
| 305 | - *Temporary Source Files from a Build:* If you just need to make some | ||
| 306 | patches to the kernel using a traditional BitBake workflow (i.e. not | ||
| 307 | using the ``devtool``), you can access temporary kernel source files | ||
| 308 | that were extracted and used during a kernel build. | ||
| 309 | |||
| 310 | The temporary kernel source files resulting from a build using BitBake | ||
| 311 | have a particular hierarchy. When you build the kernel on your | ||
| 312 | development system, all files needed for the build are taken from the | ||
| 313 | source repositories pointed to by the | ||
| 314 | ```SRC_URI`` <&YOCTO_DOCS_REF_URL;#var-SRC_URI>`__ variable and gathered | ||
| 315 | in a temporary work area where they are subsequently used to create the | ||
| 316 | unique kernel. Thus, in a sense, the process constructs a local source | ||
| 317 | tree specific to your kernel from which to generate the new kernel | ||
| 318 | image. | ||
| 319 | |||
| 320 | The following figure shows the temporary file structure created on your | ||
| 321 | host system when you build the kernel using Bitbake. This `Build | ||
| 322 | Directory <&YOCTO_DOCS_REF_URL;#build-directory>`__ contains all the | ||
| 323 | source files used during the build. | ||
| 324 | |||
| 325 | Again, for additional information on the Yocto Project kernel's | ||
| 326 | architecture and its branching strategy, see the "`Yocto Linux Kernel | ||
| 327 | Architecture and Branching | ||
| 328 | Strategies <#yocto-linux-kernel-architecture-and-branching-strategies>`__" | ||
| 329 | section. You can also reference the "`Using ``devtool`` to Patch the | ||
| 330 | Kernel <#using-devtool-to-patch-the-kernel>`__" and "`Using Traditional | ||
| 331 | Kernel Development to Patch the | ||
| 332 | Kernel <#using-traditional-kernel-development-to-patch-the-kernel>`__" | ||
| 333 | sections for detailed example that modifies the kernel. | ||
| 334 | |||
| 335 | Determining Hardware and Non-Hardware Features for the Kernel Configuration Audit Phase | ||
| 336 | ======================================================================================= | ||
| 337 | |||
| 338 | This section describes part of the kernel configuration audit phase that | ||
| 339 | most developers can ignore. For general information on kernel | ||
| 340 | configuration including ``menuconfig``, ``defconfig`` files, and | ||
| 341 | configuration fragments, see the "`Configuring the | ||
| 342 | Kernel <#configuring-the-kernel>`__" section. | ||
| 343 | |||
| 344 | During this part of the audit phase, the contents of the final | ||
| 345 | ``.config`` file are compared against the fragments specified by the | ||
| 346 | system. These fragments can be system fragments, distro fragments, or | ||
| 347 | user-specified configuration elements. Regardless of their origin, the | ||
| 348 | OpenEmbedded build system warns the user if a specific option is not | ||
| 349 | included in the final kernel configuration. | ||
| 350 | |||
| 351 | By default, in order to not overwhelm the user with configuration | ||
| 352 | warnings, the system only reports missing "hardware" options as they | ||
| 353 | could result in a boot failure or indicate that important hardware is | ||
| 354 | not available. | ||
| 355 | |||
| 356 | To determine whether or not a given option is "hardware" or | ||
| 357 | "non-hardware", the kernel Metadata in ``yocto-kernel-cache`` contains | ||
| 358 | files that classify individual or groups of options as either hardware | ||
| 359 | or non-hardware. To better show this, consider a situation where the | ||
| 360 | ``yocto-kernel-cache`` contains the following files: | ||
| 361 | yocto-kernel-cache/features/drm-psb/hardware.cfg | ||
| 362 | yocto-kernel-cache/features/kgdb/hardware.cfg | ||
| 363 | yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/hardware.cfg | ||
| 364 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta32/hardware.cfg | ||
| 365 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemu-ppc32/hardware.cfg | ||
| 366 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemuarma9/hardware.cfg | ||
| 367 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta64/hardware.cfg | ||
| 368 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/arm-versatile-926ejs/hardware.cfg | ||
| 369 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc/hardware.cfg | ||
| 370 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc-64/hardware.cfg | ||
| 371 | yocto-kernel-cache/features/rfkill/non-hardware.cfg | ||
| 372 | yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/non-hardware.cfg | ||
| 373 | yocto-kernel-cache/features/aufs/non-hardware.kcf | ||
| 374 | yocto-kernel-cache/features/ocf/non-hardware.kcf | ||
| 375 | yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/non-hardware.kcf | ||
| 376 | yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/hardware.kcf | ||
| 377 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemu-ppc32/hardware.kcf The following list | ||
| 378 | provides explanations for the various files: | ||
| 379 | |||
| 380 | - ``hardware.kcf``: Specifies a list of kernel Kconfig files that | ||
| 381 | contain hardware options only. | ||
| 382 | |||
| 383 | - ``non-hardware.kcf``: Specifies a list of kernel Kconfig files that | ||
| 384 | contain non-hardware options only. | ||
| 385 | |||
| 386 | - ``hardware.cfg``: Specifies a list of kernel ``CONFIG_`` options that | ||
| 387 | are hardware, regardless of whether or not they are within a Kconfig | ||
| 388 | file specified by a hardware or non-hardware Kconfig file (i.e. | ||
| 389 | ``hardware.kcf`` or ``non-hardware.kcf``). | ||
| 390 | |||
| 391 | - ``non-hardware.cfg``: Specifies a list of kernel ``CONFIG_`` options | ||
| 392 | that are not hardware, regardless of whether or not they are within a | ||
| 393 | Kconfig file specified by a hardware or non-hardware Kconfig file | ||
| 394 | (i.e. ``hardware.kcf`` or ``non-hardware.kcf``). | ||
| 395 | |||
| 396 | Here is a specific example using the | ||
| 397 | ``kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta32/hardware.cfg``: CONFIG_SERIAL_8250 | ||
| 398 | CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS | ||
| 399 | CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE | ||
| 400 | CONFIG_VGA_ARB The kernel configuration audit automatically detects | ||
| 401 | these files (hence the names must be exactly the ones discussed here), | ||
| 402 | and uses them as inputs when generating warnings about the final | ||
| 403 | ``.config`` file. | ||
| 404 | |||
| 405 | A user-specified kernel Metadata repository, or recipe space feature, | ||
| 406 | can use these same files to classify options that are found within its | ||
| 407 | ``.cfg`` files as hardware or non-hardware, to prevent the OpenEmbedded | ||
| 408 | build system from producing an error or warning when an option is not in | ||
| 409 | the final ``.config`` file. | ||
