diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst | 420 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 420 deletions
diff --git a/documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst b/documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 6a2fe4bb0b..0000000000 --- a/documentation/kernel-dev/concepts-appx.rst +++ /dev/null | |||
| @@ -1,420 +0,0 @@ | |||
| 1 | .. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-2.0-UK | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | ************************ | ||
| 4 | Advanced Kernel Concepts | ||
| 5 | ************************ | ||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | Yocto Project Kernel Development and Maintenance | ||
| 8 | ================================================ | ||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | Kernels available through the Yocto Project (Yocto Linux kernels), like | ||
| 11 | other kernels, are based off the Linux kernel releases from | ||
| 12 | https://www.kernel.org. At the beginning of a major Linux kernel | ||
| 13 | development cycle, the Yocto Project team chooses a Linux kernel based | ||
| 14 | on factors such as release timing, the anticipated release timing of | ||
| 15 | final upstream ``kernel.org`` versions, and Yocto Project feature | ||
| 16 | requirements. Typically, the Linux kernel chosen is in the final stages | ||
| 17 | of development by the Linux community. In other words, the Linux kernel | ||
| 18 | is in the release candidate or "rc" phase and has yet to reach final | ||
| 19 | release. But, by being in the final stages of external development, the | ||
| 20 | team knows that the ``kernel.org`` final release will clearly be within | ||
| 21 | the early stages of the Yocto Project development window. | ||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | This balance allows the Yocto Project team to deliver the most | ||
| 24 | up-to-date Yocto Linux kernel possible, while still ensuring that the | ||
| 25 | team has a stable official release for the baseline Linux kernel | ||
| 26 | version. | ||
| 27 | |||
| 28 | As implied earlier, the ultimate source for Yocto Linux kernels are | ||
| 29 | released kernels from ``kernel.org``. In addition to a foundational | ||
| 30 | kernel from ``kernel.org``, the available Yocto Linux kernels contain a | ||
| 31 | mix of important new mainline developments, non-mainline developments | ||
| 32 | (when no alternative exists), Board Support Package (BSP) developments, | ||
| 33 | and custom features. These additions result in a commercially released | ||
| 34 | Yocto Project Linux kernel that caters to specific embedded designer | ||
| 35 | needs for targeted hardware. | ||
| 36 | |||
| 37 | You can find a web interface to the Yocto Linux kernels in the | ||
| 38 | :ref:`overview-manual/development-environment:yocto project source repositories` | ||
| 39 | at :yocto_git:`/`. If you look at the interface, you will see to | ||
| 40 | the left a grouping of Git repositories titled "Yocto Linux Kernel". | ||
| 41 | Within this group, you will find several Linux Yocto kernels developed | ||
| 42 | and included with Yocto Project releases: | ||
| 43 | |||
| 44 | - *linux-yocto-4.1:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with | ||
| 45 | the Yocto Project Release 2.0. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.1 | ||
| 46 | released kernel. | ||
| 47 | |||
| 48 | - *linux-yocto-4.4:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with | ||
| 49 | the Yocto Project Release 2.1. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.4 | ||
| 50 | released kernel. | ||
| 51 | |||
| 52 | - *linux-yocto-4.6:* A temporary kernel that is not tied to any | ||
| 53 | Yocto Project release. | ||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | - *linux-yocto-4.8:* The stable yocto Project kernel to use with | ||
| 56 | the Yocto Project Release 2.2. | ||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | - *linux-yocto-4.9:* The stable Yocto Project kernel to use with | ||
| 59 | the Yocto Project Release 2.3. This kernel is based on the Linux 4.9 | ||
| 60 | released kernel. | ||
| 61 | |||
| 62 | - *linux-yocto-4.10:* The default stable Yocto Project kernel to | ||
| 63 | use with the Yocto Project Release 2.3. This kernel is based on the | ||
| 64 | Linux 4.10 released kernel. | ||
| 65 | |||
| 66 | - *linux-yocto-4.12:* The default stable Yocto Project kernel to | ||
| 67 | use with the Yocto Project Release 2.4. This kernel is based on the | ||
| 68 | Linux 4.12 released kernel. | ||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | - *yocto-kernel-cache:* The ``linux-yocto-cache`` contains patches | ||
| 71 | and configurations for the linux-yocto kernel tree. This repository | ||
| 72 | is useful when working on the linux-yocto kernel. For more | ||
| 73 | information on this "Advanced Kernel Metadata", see the | ||
| 74 | ":doc:`/kernel-dev/advanced`" Chapter. | ||
| 75 | |||
| 76 | - *linux-yocto-dev:* A development kernel based on the latest | ||
| 77 | upstream release candidate available. | ||
| 78 | |||
| 79 | .. note:: | ||
| 80 | |||
| 81 | Long Term Support Initiative (LTSI) for Yocto Linux kernels is as | ||
| 82 | follows: | ||
| 83 | |||
| 84 | - For Yocto Project releases 1.7, 1.8, and 2.0, the LTSI kernel is | ||
| 85 | ``linux-yocto-3.14``. | ||
| 86 | |||
| 87 | - For Yocto Project releases 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, the LTSI kernel is | ||
| 88 | ``linux-yocto-4.1``. | ||
| 89 | |||
| 90 | - For Yocto Project release 2.4, the LTSI kernel is | ||
| 91 | ``linux-yocto-4.9`` | ||
| 92 | |||
| 93 | - ``linux-yocto-4.4`` is an LTS kernel. | ||
| 94 | |||
| 95 | Once a Yocto Linux kernel is officially released, the Yocto Project team | ||
| 96 | goes into their next development cycle, or upward revision (uprev) | ||
| 97 | cycle, while still continuing maintenance on the released kernel. It is | ||
| 98 | important to note that the most sustainable and stable way to include | ||
| 99 | feature development upstream is through a kernel uprev process. | ||
| 100 | Back-porting hundreds of individual fixes and minor features from | ||
| 101 | various kernel versions is not sustainable and can easily compromise | ||
| 102 | quality. | ||
| 103 | |||
| 104 | During the uprev cycle, the Yocto Project team uses an ongoing analysis | ||
| 105 | of Linux kernel development, BSP support, and release timing to select | ||
| 106 | the best possible ``kernel.org`` Linux kernel version on which to base | ||
| 107 | subsequent Yocto Linux kernel development. The team continually monitors | ||
| 108 | Linux community kernel development to look for significant features of | ||
| 109 | interest. The team does consider back-porting large features if they | ||
| 110 | have a significant advantage. User or community demand can also trigger | ||
| 111 | a back-port or creation of new functionality in the Yocto Project | ||
| 112 | baseline kernel during the uprev cycle. | ||
| 113 | |||
| 114 | Generally speaking, every new Linux kernel both adds features and | ||
| 115 | introduces new bugs. These consequences are the basic properties of | ||
| 116 | upstream Linux kernel development and are managed by the Yocto Project | ||
| 117 | team's Yocto Linux kernel development strategy. It is the Yocto Project | ||
| 118 | team's policy to not back-port minor features to the released Yocto | ||
| 119 | Linux kernel. They only consider back-porting significant technological | ||
| 120 | jumps --- and, that is done after a complete gap analysis. The reason | ||
| 121 | for this policy is that back-porting any small to medium sized change | ||
| 122 | from an evolving Linux kernel can easily create mismatches, | ||
| 123 | incompatibilities and very subtle errors. | ||
| 124 | |||
| 125 | The policies described in this section result in both a stable and a | ||
| 126 | cutting edge Yocto Linux kernel that mixes forward ports of existing | ||
| 127 | Linux kernel features and significant and critical new functionality. | ||
| 128 | Forward porting Linux kernel functionality into the Yocto Linux kernels | ||
| 129 | available through the Yocto Project can be thought of as a "micro | ||
| 130 | uprev". The many "micro uprevs" produce a Yocto Linux kernel version | ||
| 131 | with a mix of important new mainline, non-mainline, BSP developments and | ||
| 132 | feature integrations. This Yocto Linux kernel gives insight into new | ||
| 133 | features and allows focused amounts of testing to be done on the kernel, | ||
| 134 | which prevents surprises when selecting the next major uprev. The | ||
| 135 | quality of these cutting edge Yocto Linux kernels is evolving and the | ||
| 136 | kernels are used in leading edge feature and BSP development. | ||
| 137 | |||
| 138 | Yocto Linux Kernel Architecture and Branching Strategies | ||
| 139 | ======================================================== | ||
| 140 | |||
| 141 | As mentioned earlier, a key goal of the Yocto Project is to present the | ||
| 142 | developer with a kernel that has a clear and continuous history that is | ||
| 143 | visible to the user. The architecture and mechanisms, in particular the | ||
| 144 | branching strategies, used achieve that goal in a manner similar to | ||
| 145 | upstream Linux kernel development in ``kernel.org``. | ||
| 146 | |||
| 147 | You can think of a Yocto Linux kernel as consisting of a baseline Linux | ||
| 148 | kernel with added features logically structured on top of the baseline. | ||
| 149 | The features are tagged and organized by way of a branching strategy | ||
| 150 | implemented by the Yocto Project team using the Source Code Manager | ||
| 151 | (SCM) Git. | ||
| 152 | |||
| 153 | .. note:: | ||
| 154 | |||
| 155 | - Git is the obvious SCM for meeting the Yocto Linux kernel | ||
| 156 | organizational and structural goals described in this section. Not | ||
| 157 | only is Git the SCM for Linux kernel development in ``kernel.org`` | ||
| 158 | but, Git continues to grow in popularity and supports many | ||
| 159 | different work flows, front-ends and management techniques. | ||
| 160 | |||
| 161 | - You can find documentation on Git at https://git-scm.com/doc. You can | ||
| 162 | also get an introduction to Git as it applies to the Yocto Project in the | ||
| 163 | ":ref:`overview-manual/development-environment:git`" section in the Yocto Project | ||
| 164 | Overview and Concepts Manual. The latter reference provides an | ||
| 165 | overview of Git and presents a minimal set of Git commands that | ||
| 166 | allows you to be functional using Git. You can use as much, or as | ||
| 167 | little, of what Git has to offer to accomplish what you need for | ||
| 168 | your project. You do not have to be a "Git Expert" in order to use | ||
| 169 | it with the Yocto Project. | ||
| 170 | |||
| 171 | Using Git's tagging and branching features, the Yocto Project team | ||
| 172 | creates kernel branches at points where functionality is no longer | ||
| 173 | shared and thus, needs to be isolated. For example, board-specific | ||
| 174 | incompatibilities would require different functionality and would | ||
| 175 | require a branch to separate the features. Likewise, for specific kernel | ||
| 176 | features, the same branching strategy is used. | ||
| 177 | |||
| 178 | This "tree-like" architecture results in a structure that has features | ||
| 179 | organized to be specific for particular functionality, single kernel | ||
| 180 | types, or a subset of kernel types. Thus, the user has the ability to | ||
| 181 | see the added features and the commits that make up those features. In | ||
| 182 | addition to being able to see added features, the user can also view the | ||
| 183 | history of what made up the baseline Linux kernel. | ||
| 184 | |||
| 185 | Another consequence of this strategy results in not having to store the | ||
| 186 | same feature twice internally in the tree. Rather, the kernel team | ||
| 187 | stores the unique differences required to apply the feature onto the | ||
| 188 | kernel type in question. | ||
| 189 | |||
| 190 | .. note:: | ||
| 191 | |||
| 192 | The Yocto Project team strives to place features in the tree such | ||
| 193 | that features can be shared by all boards and kernel types where | ||
| 194 | possible. However, during development cycles or when large features | ||
| 195 | are merged, the team cannot always follow this practice. In those | ||
| 196 | cases, the team uses isolated branches to merge features. | ||
| 197 | |||
| 198 | BSP-specific code additions are handled in a similar manner to | ||
| 199 | kernel-specific additions. Some BSPs only make sense given certain | ||
| 200 | kernel types. So, for these types, the team creates branches off the end | ||
| 201 | of that kernel type for all of the BSPs that are supported on that | ||
| 202 | kernel type. From the perspective of the tools that create the BSP | ||
| 203 | branch, the BSP is really no different than a feature. Consequently, the | ||
| 204 | same branching strategy applies to BSPs as it does to kernel features. | ||
| 205 | So again, rather than store the BSP twice, the team only stores the | ||
| 206 | unique differences for the BSP across the supported multiple kernels. | ||
| 207 | |||
| 208 | While this strategy can result in a tree with a significant number of | ||
| 209 | branches, it is important to realize that from the developer's point of | ||
| 210 | view, there is a linear path that travels from the baseline | ||
| 211 | ``kernel.org``, through a select group of features and ends with their | ||
| 212 | BSP-specific commits. In other words, the divisions of the kernel are | ||
| 213 | transparent and are not relevant to the developer on a day-to-day basis. | ||
| 214 | From the developer's perspective, this path is the development branch. | ||
| 215 | The developer does not need to be aware of the existence of | ||
| 216 | any other branches at all. Of course, it can make sense to have these | ||
| 217 | branches in the tree, should a person decide to explore them. For | ||
| 218 | example, a comparison between two BSPs at either the commit level or at | ||
| 219 | the line-by-line code ``diff`` level is now a trivial operation. | ||
| 220 | |||
| 221 | The following illustration shows the conceptual Yocto Linux kernel. | ||
| 222 | |||
| 223 | .. image:: figures/kernel-architecture-overview.png | ||
| 224 | :width: 100% | ||
| 225 | |||
| 226 | In the illustration, the "Kernel.org Branch Point" marks the specific | ||
| 227 | spot (or Linux kernel release) from which the Yocto Linux kernel is | ||
| 228 | created. From this point forward in the tree, features and differences | ||
| 229 | are organized and tagged. | ||
| 230 | |||
| 231 | The "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel" contains functionality that is | ||
| 232 | common to every kernel type and BSP that is organized further along in | ||
| 233 | the tree. Placing these common features in the tree this way means | ||
| 234 | features do not have to be duplicated along individual branches of the | ||
| 235 | tree structure. | ||
| 236 | |||
| 237 | From the "Yocto Project Baseline Kernel", branch points represent | ||
| 238 | specific functionality for individual Board Support Packages (BSPs) as | ||
| 239 | well as real-time kernels. The illustration represents this through | ||
| 240 | three BSP-specific branches and a real-time kernel branch. Each branch | ||
| 241 | represents some unique functionality for the BSP or for a real-time | ||
| 242 | Yocto Linux kernel. | ||
| 243 | |||
| 244 | In this example structure, the "Real-time (rt) Kernel" branch has common | ||
| 245 | features for all real-time Yocto Linux kernels and contains more | ||
| 246 | branches for individual BSP-specific real-time kernels. The illustration | ||
| 247 | shows three branches as an example. Each branch points the way to | ||
| 248 | specific, unique features for a respective real-time kernel as they | ||
| 249 | apply to a given BSP. | ||
| 250 | |||
| 251 | The resulting tree structure presents a clear path of markers (or | ||
| 252 | branches) to the developer that, for all practical purposes, is the | ||
| 253 | Yocto Linux kernel needed for any given set of requirements. | ||
| 254 | |||
| 255 | .. note:: | ||
| 256 | |||
| 257 | Keep in mind the figure does not take into account all the supported | ||
| 258 | Yocto Linux kernels, but rather shows a single generic kernel just | ||
| 259 | for conceptual purposes. Also keep in mind that this structure | ||
| 260 | represents the | ||
| 261 | :ref:`overview-manual/development-environment:yocto project source repositories` | ||
| 262 | that are either pulled from during the build or established on the | ||
| 263 | host development system prior to the build by either cloning a | ||
| 264 | particular kernel's Git repository or by downloading and unpacking a | ||
| 265 | tarball. | ||
| 266 | |||
| 267 | Working with the kernel as a structured tree follows recognized | ||
| 268 | community best practices. In particular, the kernel as shipped with the | ||
| 269 | product, should be considered an "upstream source" and viewed as a | ||
| 270 | series of historical and documented modifications (commits). These | ||
| 271 | modifications represent the development and stabilization done by the | ||
| 272 | Yocto Project kernel development team. | ||
| 273 | |||
| 274 | Because commits only change at significant release points in the product | ||
| 275 | life cycle, developers can work on a branch created from the last | ||
| 276 | relevant commit in the shipped Yocto Project Linux kernel. As mentioned | ||
| 277 | previously, the structure is transparent to the developer because the | ||
| 278 | kernel tree is left in this state after cloning and building the kernel. | ||
| 279 | |||
| 280 | Kernel Build File Hierarchy | ||
| 281 | =========================== | ||
| 282 | |||
| 283 | Upstream storage of all the available kernel source code is one thing, | ||
| 284 | while representing and using the code on your host development system is | ||
| 285 | another. Conceptually, you can think of the kernel source repositories | ||
| 286 | as all the source files necessary for all the supported Yocto Linux | ||
| 287 | kernels. As a developer, you are just interested in the source files for | ||
| 288 | the kernel on which you are working. And, furthermore, you need them | ||
| 289 | available on your host system. | ||
| 290 | |||
| 291 | Kernel source code is available on your host system several different | ||
| 292 | ways: | ||
| 293 | |||
| 294 | - *Files Accessed While using devtool:* ``devtool``, which is | ||
| 295 | available with the Yocto Project, is the preferred method by which to | ||
| 296 | modify the kernel. See the ":ref:`kernel-dev/intro:kernel modification workflow`" section. | ||
| 297 | |||
| 298 | - *Cloned Repository:* If you are working in the kernel all the time, | ||
| 299 | you probably would want to set up your own local Git repository of | ||
| 300 | the Yocto Linux kernel tree. For information on how to clone a Yocto | ||
| 301 | Linux kernel Git repository, see the | ||
| 302 | ":ref:`kernel-dev/common:preparing the build host to work on the kernel`" | ||
| 303 | section. | ||
| 304 | |||
| 305 | - *Temporary Source Files from a Build:* If you just need to make some | ||
| 306 | patches to the kernel using a traditional BitBake workflow (i.e. not | ||
| 307 | using the ``devtool``), you can access temporary kernel source files | ||
| 308 | that were extracted and used during a kernel build. | ||
| 309 | |||
| 310 | The temporary kernel source files resulting from a build using BitBake | ||
| 311 | have a particular hierarchy. When you build the kernel on your | ||
| 312 | development system, all files needed for the build are taken from the | ||
| 313 | source repositories pointed to by the | ||
| 314 | :term:`SRC_URI` variable and gathered | ||
| 315 | in a temporary work area where they are subsequently used to create the | ||
| 316 | unique kernel. Thus, in a sense, the process constructs a local source | ||
| 317 | tree specific to your kernel from which to generate the new kernel | ||
| 318 | image. | ||
| 319 | |||
| 320 | The following figure shows the temporary file structure created on your | ||
| 321 | host system when you build the kernel using BitBake. This | ||
| 322 | :term:`Build Directory` contains all the source files used during the build. | ||
| 323 | |||
| 324 | .. image:: figures/kernel-overview-2-generic.png | ||
| 325 | :align: center | ||
| 326 | :width: 70% | ||
| 327 | |||
| 328 | Again, for additional information on the Yocto Project kernel's | ||
| 329 | architecture and its branching strategy, see the | ||
| 330 | ":ref:`kernel-dev/concepts-appx:yocto linux kernel architecture and branching strategies`" | ||
| 331 | section. You can also reference the | ||
| 332 | ":ref:`kernel-dev/common:using \`\`devtool\`\` to patch the kernel`" | ||
| 333 | and | ||
| 334 | ":ref:`kernel-dev/common:using traditional kernel development to patch the kernel`" | ||
| 335 | sections for detailed example that modifies the kernel. | ||
| 336 | |||
| 337 | Determining Hardware and Non-Hardware Features for the Kernel Configuration Audit Phase | ||
| 338 | ======================================================================================= | ||
| 339 | |||
| 340 | This section describes part of the kernel configuration audit phase that | ||
| 341 | most developers can ignore. For general information on kernel | ||
| 342 | configuration including ``menuconfig``, ``defconfig`` files, and | ||
| 343 | configuration fragments, see the | ||
| 344 | ":ref:`kernel-dev/common:configuring the kernel`" section. | ||
| 345 | |||
| 346 | During this part of the audit phase, the contents of the final | ||
| 347 | ``.config`` file are compared against the fragments specified by the | ||
| 348 | system. These fragments can be system fragments, distro fragments, or | ||
| 349 | user-specified configuration elements. Regardless of their origin, the | ||
| 350 | OpenEmbedded build system warns the user if a specific option is not | ||
| 351 | included in the final kernel configuration. | ||
| 352 | |||
| 353 | By default, in order to not overwhelm the user with configuration | ||
| 354 | warnings, the system only reports missing "hardware" options as they | ||
| 355 | could result in a boot failure or indicate that important hardware is | ||
| 356 | not available. | ||
| 357 | |||
| 358 | To determine whether or not a given option is "hardware" or | ||
| 359 | "non-hardware", the kernel Metadata in ``yocto-kernel-cache`` contains | ||
| 360 | files that classify individual or groups of options as either hardware | ||
| 361 | or non-hardware. To better show this, consider a situation where the | ||
| 362 | ``yocto-kernel-cache`` contains the following files:: | ||
| 363 | |||
| 364 | yocto-kernel-cache/features/drm-psb/hardware.cfg | ||
| 365 | yocto-kernel-cache/features/kgdb/hardware.cfg | ||
| 366 | yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/hardware.cfg | ||
| 367 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta32/hardware.cfg | ||
| 368 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemu-ppc32/hardware.cfg | ||
| 369 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemuarma9/hardware.cfg | ||
| 370 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta64/hardware.cfg | ||
| 371 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/arm-versatile-926ejs/hardware.cfg | ||
| 372 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc/hardware.cfg | ||
| 373 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/common-pc-64/hardware.cfg | ||
| 374 | yocto-kernel-cache/features/rfkill/non-hardware.cfg | ||
| 375 | yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/non-hardware.cfg | ||
| 376 | yocto-kernel-cache/features/aufs/non-hardware.kcf | ||
| 377 | yocto-kernel-cache/features/ocf/non-hardware.kcf | ||
| 378 | yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/non-hardware.kcf | ||
| 379 | yocto-kernel-cache/ktypes/base/hardware.kcf | ||
| 380 | yocto-kernel-cache/bsp/qemu-ppc32/hardware.kcf | ||
| 381 | |||
| 382 | Here are explanations for the various files: | ||
| 383 | |||
| 384 | - ``hardware.kcf``: Specifies a list of kernel Kconfig files that | ||
| 385 | contain hardware options only. | ||
| 386 | |||
| 387 | - ``non-hardware.kcf``: Specifies a list of kernel Kconfig files that | ||
| 388 | contain non-hardware options only. | ||
| 389 | |||
| 390 | - ``hardware.cfg``: Specifies a list of kernel ``CONFIG_`` options that | ||
| 391 | are hardware, regardless of whether or not they are within a Kconfig | ||
| 392 | file specified by a hardware or non-hardware Kconfig file (i.e. | ||
| 393 | ``hardware.kcf`` or ``non-hardware.kcf``). | ||
| 394 | |||
| 395 | - ``non-hardware.cfg``: Specifies a list of kernel ``CONFIG_`` options | ||
| 396 | that are not hardware, regardless of whether or not they are within a | ||
| 397 | Kconfig file specified by a hardware or non-hardware Kconfig file | ||
| 398 | (i.e. ``hardware.kcf`` or ``non-hardware.kcf``). | ||
| 399 | |||
| 400 | Here is a specific example using the | ||
| 401 | ``kernel-cache/bsp/mti-malta32/hardware.cfg``:: | ||
| 402 | |||
| 403 | CONFIG_SERIAL_8250 | ||
| 404 | CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE | ||
| 405 | CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS | ||
| 406 | CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI | ||
| 407 | CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE | ||
| 408 | CONFIG_SERIAL_CORE_CONSOLE | ||
| 409 | CONFIG_VGA_ARB | ||
| 410 | |||
| 411 | The kernel configuration audit automatically detects | ||
| 412 | these files (hence the names must be exactly the ones discussed here), | ||
| 413 | and uses them as inputs when generating warnings about the final | ||
| 414 | ``.config`` file. | ||
| 415 | |||
| 416 | A user-specified kernel Metadata repository, or recipe space feature, | ||
| 417 | can use these same files to classify options that are found within its | ||
| 418 | ``.cfg`` files as hardware or non-hardware, to prevent the OpenEmbedded | ||
| 419 | build system from producing an error or warning when an option is not in | ||
| 420 | the final ``.config`` file. | ||
