package_rpm: Fix some pycodestyle issues

Fix following subset of observations reported by version 2.10.0 of
pycodestyle utility:

  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:65:46: E231 missing whitespace after ','
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:66:46: E231 missing whitespace after ','
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:107:19: E231 missing whitespace after ','
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:109:69: E202 whitespace before ')'
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:122:103: W291 trailing whitespace
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:194:74: W291 trailing whitespace
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:448:16: E713 test for membership should be 'not in'
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:450:16: E713 test for membership should be 'not in'
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:520:1: W293 blank line contains whitespace
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:521:15: E231 missing whitespace after ','
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:542:12: E713 test for membership should be 'not in'
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:544:12: E713 test for membership should be 'not in'
  meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass:647:67: W291 trailing whitespace

(From OE-Core rev: 7920599c05c066767025063b277df73c6560753d)

Signed-off-by: Niko Mauno <niko.mauno@vaisala.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass b/meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass
index 85d0bd7fce..992446a033 100644
--- a/meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes-global/package_rpm.bbclass
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ def write_rpm_perfiledata(srcname, d):
                 for dep in depends_dict:
                     ver = depends_dict[dep]
                     if dep and ver:
-                        ver = ver.replace("(","")
-                        ver = ver.replace(")","")
+                        ver = ver.replace("(", "")
+                        ver = ver.replace(")", "")
                         outfile.write(dep + " " + ver + " ")
                     else:
                         outfile.write(dep + " ")
@@ -104,9 +104,9 @@ python write_specfile () {
     import oe.packagedata
 
     # append information for logs and patches to %prep
-    def add_prep(d,spec_files_bottom):
+    def add_prep(d, spec_files_bottom):
         if d.getVarFlag('ARCHIVER_MODE', 'srpm') == '1' and bb.data.inherits_class('archiver', d):
-            spec_files_bottom.append('%%prep -n %s' % d.getVar('PN') )
+            spec_files_bottom.append('%%prep -n %s' % d.getVar('PN'))
             spec_files_bottom.append('%s' % "echo \"include logs and patches, Please check them in SOURCES\"")
             spec_files_bottom.append('')
 
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ python write_specfile () {
             source_list = os.listdir(ar_outdir)
             source_number = 0
             for source in source_list:
-                # do_deploy_archives may have already run (from sstate) meaning a .src.rpm may already 
+                # do_deploy_archives may have already run (from sstate) meaning a .src.rpm may already
                 # exist in ARCHIVER_OUTDIR so skip if present.
                 if source.endswith(".src.rpm"):
                     continue
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ python write_specfile () {
 
     def walk_files(walkpath, target, conffiles, dirfiles):
         # We can race against the ipk/deb backends which create CONTROL or DEBIAN directories
-        # when packaging. We just ignore these files which are created in 
+        # when packaging. We just ignore these files which are created in
         # packages-split/ and not package/
         # We have the odd situation where the CONTROL/DEBIAN directory can be removed in the middle of
         # of the walk, the isdir() test would then fail and the walk code would assume its a file
@@ -445,9 +445,9 @@ python write_specfile () {
         rprovides = bb.utils.explode_dep_versions2(splitrprovides)
         rreplaces = bb.utils.explode_dep_versions2(splitrreplaces)
         for dep in rreplaces:
-            if not dep in robsoletes:
+            if dep not in robsoletes:
                 robsoletes[dep] = rreplaces[dep]
-            if not dep in rprovides:
+            if dep not in rprovides:
                 rprovides[dep] = rreplaces[dep]
         splitrobsoletes = bb.utils.join_deps(robsoletes, commasep=False)
         splitrprovides = bb.utils.join_deps(rprovides, commasep=False)
@@ -517,8 +517,8 @@ python write_specfile () {
             spec_files_bottom.append('')
 
         del localdata
-    
-    add_prep(d,spec_files_bottom)
+
+    add_prep(d, spec_files_bottom)
     spec_preamble_top.append('Summary: %s' % srcsummary)
     spec_preamble_top.append('Name: %s' % srcname)
     spec_preamble_top.append('Version: %s' % srcversion)
@@ -539,9 +539,9 @@ python write_specfile () {
     rprovides = bb.utils.explode_dep_versions2(srcrprovides)
     rreplaces = bb.utils.explode_dep_versions2(srcrreplaces)
     for dep in rreplaces:
-        if not dep in robsoletes:
+        if dep not in robsoletes:
             robsoletes[dep] = rreplaces[dep]
-        if not dep in rprovides:
+        if dep not in rprovides:
             rprovides[dep] = rreplaces[dep]
     srcrobsoletes = bb.utils.join_deps(robsoletes, commasep=False)
     srcrprovides = bb.utils.join_deps(rprovides, commasep=False)
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ python do_package_rpm () {
         return
 
     # Construct the spec file...
-    # If the spec file already exist, and has not been stored into 
+    # If the spec file already exist, and has not been stored into
     # pseudo's files.db, it maybe cause rpmbuild src.rpm fail,
     # so remove it before doing rpmbuild src.rpm.
     srcname    = d.getVar('PN')