Prefer xrange over range for small performance gain.

range() allocates an actual list when called.  xrange() is just an iterator
and creates the next range item on demand.  This provides a slight
performance increase.

In python 3, range will do what xrange does currently, but the upgrade will
be handled by the 2to3 tool.

(Bitbake rev: 73b40f06444cb877a5960b2aa66abf7dacbd88f0)

Signed-off-by: Bob Foerster <robert@erafx.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py
index 33b9201e6f..2e139558bc 100644
--- a/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py
+++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/cooker.py
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ class BBCooker:
         depend_tree["rdepends-pkg"] = {}
         depend_tree["rrecs-pkg"] = {}
 
-        for task in range(len(rq.rqdata.runq_fnid)):
+        for task in xrange(len(rq.rqdata.runq_fnid)):
             taskname = rq.rqdata.runq_task[task]
             fnid = rq.rqdata.runq_fnid[task]
             fn = taskdata.fn_index[fnid]