glibc: nptl Fix indentation

The following commits have been cherry-picked from Glibc master branch:
Bug : https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25847
  [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=ee6c14ed59d480720721aaacc5fb03213dc153da
  [2] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-stable/2025-July/002280.html

(From OE-Core rev: f54e082df2f07893f66183089518f98cb792f22e)

Signed-off-by: Sunil Dora <sunilkumar.dora@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@sakoman.com>

2 files changed, 150 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-PR25847-7.patch b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-PR25847-7.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..74cb49670b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0026-PR25847-7.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+From 1077953950d1e8864c63222967141c67f51297f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Malte Skarupke <malteskarupke@fastmail.fm>
+Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 06:27:04 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] nptl: Fix indentation
+
+In my previous change I turned a nested loop into a simple loop. I'm doing
+the resulting indentation changes in a separate commit to make the diff on
+the previous commit easier to review.
+
+The following commits have been cherry-picked from Glibc master branch:
+Bug : https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25847
+commit: ee6c14ed59d480720721aaacc5fb03213dc153da
+
+Upstream-Status: Submitted
+[https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-stable/2025-July/002280.html]
+
+Signed-off-by: Sunil Dora <sunilkumar.dora@windriver.com>
+---
+ nptl/pthread_cond_wait.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
+ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/nptl/pthread_cond_wait.c b/nptl/pthread_cond_wait.c
+index c8c99bbf..adf26a80 100644
+--- a/nptl/pthread_cond_wait.c
++++ b/nptl/pthread_cond_wait.c
+@@ -383,65 +383,65 @@ __pthread_cond_wait_common (pthread_cond_t *cond, pthread_mutex_t *mutex,
+     }
+ 
+ 
+-      while (1)
+-       {
+-         /* Now wait until a signal is available in our group or it is closed.
+-            Acquire MO so that if we observe (signals == lowseq) after group
+-            switching in __condvar_quiesce_and_switch_g1, we synchronize with that
+-            store and will see the prior update of __g1_start done while switching
+-            groups too.  */
+-         unsigned int signals = atomic_load_acquire (cond->__data.__g_signals + g);
+-         uint64_t g1_start = __condvar_load_g1_start_relaxed (cond);
+-         unsigned int lowseq = (g1_start & 1) == g ? signals : g1_start & ~1U;
+-
+-         if (seq < (g1_start >> 1))
+-           {
+-             /* If the group is closed already,
+-                then this waiter originally had enough extra signals to
+-                consume, up until the time its group was closed.  */
+-              break;
+-           }
+-
+-         /* If there is an available signal, don't block.
+-            If __g1_start has advanced at all, then we must be in G1
+-            by now, perhaps in the process of switching back to an older
+-            G2, but in either case we're allowed to consume the available
+-            signal and should not block anymore.  */
+-         if ((int)(signals - lowseq) >= 2)
+-           {
+-             /* Try to grab a signal.  See above for MO.  (if we do another loop
+-                iteration we need to see the correct value of g1_start)  */
+-                     if (atomic_compare_exchange_weak_acquire (
+-                               cond->__data.__g_signals + g,
++  while (1)
++    {
++      /* Now wait until a signal is available in our group or it is closed.
++         Acquire MO so that if we observe (signals == lowseq) after group
++         switching in __condvar_quiesce_and_switch_g1, we synchronize with that
++         store and will see the prior update of __g1_start done while switching
++         groups too.  */
++      unsigned int signals = atomic_load_acquire (cond->__data.__g_signals + g);
++      uint64_t g1_start = __condvar_load_g1_start_relaxed (cond);
++      unsigned int lowseq = (g1_start & 1) == g ? signals : g1_start & ~1U;
++
++      if (seq < (g1_start >> 1))
++        {
++          /* If the group is closed already,
++             then this waiter originally had enough extra signals to
++             consume, up until the time its group was closed.  */
++           break;
++        }
++
++      /* If there is an available signal, don't block.
++         If __g1_start has advanced at all, then we must be in G1
++         by now, perhaps in the process of switching back to an older
++         G2, but in either case we're allowed to consume the available
++         signal and should not block anymore.  */
++      if ((int)(signals - lowseq) >= 2)
++        {
++         /* Try to grab a signal.  See above for MO.  (if we do another loop
++            iteration we need to see the correct value of g1_start)  */
++           if (atomic_compare_exchange_weak_acquire (
++                       cond->__data.__g_signals + g,
+                        &signals, signals - 2))
+-                       break;
+-                     else
+-                       continue;
+-           }
+-
+-         // Now block.
+-         struct _pthread_cleanup_buffer buffer;
+-         struct _condvar_cleanup_buffer cbuffer;
+-         cbuffer.wseq = wseq;
+-         cbuffer.cond = cond;
+-         cbuffer.mutex = mutex;
+-         cbuffer.private = private;
+-         __pthread_cleanup_push (&buffer, __condvar_cleanup_waiting, &cbuffer);
+-
+-         err = __futex_abstimed_wait_cancelable64 (
+-           cond->__data.__g_signals + g, signals, clockid, abstime, private);
+-
+-         __pthread_cleanup_pop (&buffer, 0);
+-
+-         if (__glibc_unlikely (err == ETIMEDOUT || err == EOVERFLOW))
+-           {
+-             /* If we timed out, we effectively cancel waiting.  */
+-             __condvar_cancel_waiting (cond, seq, g, private);
+-             result = err;
+              break;
+-           }
++           else
++             continue;
+        }
+ 
++      // Now block.
++      struct _pthread_cleanup_buffer buffer;
++      struct _condvar_cleanup_buffer cbuffer;
++      cbuffer.wseq = wseq;
++      cbuffer.cond = cond;
++      cbuffer.mutex = mutex;
++      cbuffer.private = private;
++      __pthread_cleanup_push (&buffer, __condvar_cleanup_waiting, &cbuffer);
++
++      err = __futex_abstimed_wait_cancelable64 (
++        cond->__data.__g_signals + g, signals, clockid, abstime, private);
++
++      __pthread_cleanup_pop (&buffer, 0);
++
++      if (__glibc_unlikely (err == ETIMEDOUT || err == EOVERFLOW))
++        {
++          /* If we timed out, we effectively cancel waiting.  */
++          __condvar_cancel_waiting (cond, seq, g, private);
++          result = err;
++          break;
++        }
++    }
++
+   /* Confirm that we have been woken.  We do that before acquiring the mutex
+      to allow for execution of pthread_cond_destroy while having acquired the
+      mutex.  */
+-- 
+2.49.0
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.35.bb b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.35.bb
index 3034461e9e..7ef2c8cb4c 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.35.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.35.bb
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ SRC_URI =  "${GLIBC_GIT_URI};branch=${SRCBRANCH};name=glibc \
            file://0026-PR25847-4.patch \
            file://0026-PR25847-5.patch \
            file://0026-PR25847-6.patch \
+           file://0026-PR25847-7.patch \
            \
            file://0001-Revert-Linux-Implement-a-useful-version-of-_startup_.patch \
            file://0002-get_nscd_addresses-Fix-subscript-typos-BZ-29605.patch \