diff options
| author | Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com> | 2014-06-10 18:13:39 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> | 2014-06-13 12:31:39 +0100 |
| commit | 60846a0ce2dfbf9a87d4f84f04738851dfbba598 (patch) | |
| tree | 6c7a6c301d1703ef7c415adcd30de60198ac93b7 | |
| parent | f51c639f99a92e808c0fa35839416c5c075a8bd8 (diff) | |
| download | poky-60846a0ce2dfbf9a87d4f84f04738851dfbba598.tar.gz | |
kexec-tools: Refine kdump device_tree sort
The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and
assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but
acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump, the order of
serial node still is changed. So the patch is to sort these entries
by the directory name in ascending order.
(From OE-Core rev: c8722b510f779cd20757477a7f7a7a2a35b9a9c5)
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch | 82 |
2 files changed, 84 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc index 50b448caed..6a690c6a7e 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.inc | |||
| @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=ea5bed2f60d357618ca161ad539f7c0a \ | |||
| 8 | file://kexec/kexec.c;beginline=1;endline=20;md5=af10f6ae4a8715965e648aa687ad3e09" | 8 | file://kexec/kexec.c;beginline=1;endline=20;md5=af10f6ae4a8715965e648aa687ad3e09" |
| 9 | DEPENDS = "zlib xz" | 9 | DEPENDS = "zlib xz" |
| 10 | 10 | ||
| 11 | SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/linux/utils/kernel/kexec/kexec-tools-${PV}.tar.gz" | 11 | SRC_URI = "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/linux/utils/kernel/kexec/kexec-tools-${PV}.tar.gz \ |
| 12 | file://kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch" | ||
| 12 | 13 | ||
| 13 | inherit autotools-brokensep | 14 | inherit autotools-brokensep |
| 14 | 15 | ||
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ab1fe96db2 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ | |||
| 1 | kexec-tools: Refine kdump device_tree sort | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and | ||
| 4 | assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but | ||
| 5 | acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump, the order of | ||
| 6 | serial node still is changed. So the patch is to sort these entries | ||
| 7 | by the directory name in ascending order. | ||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | Upstream-Status: Pending | ||
| 10 | |||
| 11 | Signed-off-by: Yang Wei <Wei.Yang@windriver.com> | ||
| 12 | Signed-off-by: Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com> | ||
| 13 | --- | ||
| 14 | kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c | 13 ++++++++++--- | ||
| 15 | kexec/fs2dt.c | 13 ++++++++++--- | ||
| 16 | 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) | ||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c b/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c | ||
| 19 | index 4121c7d..cc04b04 100644 | ||
| 20 | --- a/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c | ||
| 21 | +++ b/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c | ||
| 22 | @@ -296,6 +296,9 @@ static int comparefunc(const void *dentry1, const void *dentry2) | ||
| 23 | { | ||
| 24 | char *str1 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry1)->d_name; | ||
| 25 | char *str2 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry2)->d_name; | ||
| 26 | + char* ptr1 = strchr(str1, '@'); | ||
| 27 | + char* ptr2 = strchr(str2, '@'); | ||
| 28 | + int len1, len2; | ||
| 29 | |||
| 30 | /* | ||
| 31 | * strcmp scans from left to right and fails to idetify for some | ||
| 32 | @@ -303,9 +306,13 @@ static int comparefunc(const void *dentry1, const void *dentry2) | ||
| 33 | * Therefore, we get the wrong sorted order like memory@10000000 and | ||
| 34 | * memory@f000000. | ||
| 35 | */ | ||
| 36 | - if (strchr(str1, '@') && strchr(str2, '@') && | ||
| 37 | - (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) | ||
| 38 | - return 1; | ||
| 39 | + if (ptr1 && ptr2) { | ||
| 40 | + len1 = ptr1 - str1; | ||
| 41 | + len2 = ptr2 - str2; | ||
| 42 | + if (!strncmp(str1, str2, len1 >len2 ? len1: len2) && | ||
| 43 | + (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) | ||
| 44 | + return 1; | ||
| 45 | + } | ||
| 46 | |||
| 47 | return strcmp(str1, str2); | ||
| 48 | } | ||
| 49 | diff --git a/kexec/fs2dt.c b/kexec/fs2dt.c | ||
| 50 | index 5e6b98d..1c0345b 100644 | ||
| 51 | --- a/kexec/fs2dt.c | ||
| 52 | +++ b/kexec/fs2dt.c | ||
| 53 | @@ -475,6 +475,9 @@ static int comparefunc(const struct dirent **dentry1, | ||
| 54 | { | ||
| 55 | char *str1 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry1)->d_name; | ||
| 56 | char *str2 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry2)->d_name; | ||
| 57 | + char* ptr1 = strchr(str1, '@'); | ||
| 58 | + char* ptr2 = strchr(str2, '@'); | ||
| 59 | + int len1, len2; | ||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | /* | ||
| 62 | * strcmp scans from left to right and fails to idetify for some | ||
| 63 | @@ -482,9 +485,13 @@ static int comparefunc(const struct dirent **dentry1, | ||
| 64 | * Therefore, we get the wrong sorted order like memory@10000000 and | ||
| 65 | * memory@f000000. | ||
| 66 | */ | ||
| 67 | - if (strchr(str1, '@') && strchr(str2, '@') && | ||
| 68 | - (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) | ||
| 69 | - return 1; | ||
| 70 | + if (ptr1 && ptr2) { | ||
| 71 | + len1 = ptr1 - str1; | ||
| 72 | + len2 = ptr2 - str2; | ||
| 73 | + if (!strncmp(str1, str2, len1 >len2 ? len1: len2) && | ||
| 74 | + (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) | ||
| 75 | + return 1; | ||
| 76 | + } | ||
| 77 | |||
| 78 | return strcmp(str1, str2); | ||
| 79 | } | ||
| 80 | -- | ||
| 81 | 1.7.9.5 | ||
| 82 | |||
