<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux/poky.git/meta/recipes-sato/matchbox-theme-sato/matchbox-theme-sato_0.1.bb, branch hardknott</title>
<subtitle>Mirror of git.yoctoproject.org/poky</subtitle>
<id>https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/poky.git/atom?h=hardknott</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/poky.git/atom?h=hardknott'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/poky.git/'/>
<updated>2016-06-15T17:05:22+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>matchbox-theme-sato: Upgrade to 0.2</title>
<updated>2016-06-15T17:05:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jussi Kukkonen</name>
<email>jussi.kukkonen@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-02-29T11:45:03+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/poky.git/commit/?id=e618179a8baf3eab0c3a45fc48685d3a8c31e21e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:e618179a8baf3eab0c3a45fc48685d3a8c31e21e</id>
<content type='text'>
New theme is tries to be more compatible with Adwaita: titlebar is
thinner, colors are mostly uniform gray instead of green.

(From OE-Core rev: 855467bb2fa8817ec4894dae8215e639ffc4a4d3)

Signed-off-by: Jussi Kukkonen &lt;jussi.kukkonen@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton &lt;ross.burton@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie &lt;richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>OECore license fixes: meta/*</title>
<updated>2011-12-08T15:24:32+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Elizabeth Flanagan</name>
<email>elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2011-12-03T23:48:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/poky.git/commit/?id=5eeea9e17013c65f3a4dab1b8215ddf2785adb06'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5eeea9e17013c65f3a4dab1b8215ddf2785adb06</id>
<content type='text'>
This is a quick audit of only the most obviously wrong licenses
found within OECore. These fixes fall into four areas:

- LICENSE field had incorrect format so that the parser choked
- LICENSE field has a license with no version
- LICENSE field was actually incorrect
- LICENSE field has an imaginary license that didn't exist

This fixes most of the LICENSE warnings thrown, along with my prior
commit adding additional licenses to common-licenses and additional
SPDXLICENSEMAP entries.

HOWEVER..... there is much to be done on the license front.
For a list of recipes with licenses that need obvious fixing see:

https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/License_Audit

That said, I would suggest another license audit as I've found
enough inconsistencies. A good suggestion is when in doubt, look at
how openSuse or Gentoo or Debian license the package.

(From OE-Core rev: 3083dd70b3a9fa01fcc3cf00373b05502505996e)

Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Flanagan &lt;elizabeth.flanagan@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie &lt;richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>SRC_URI Checksums Additionals</title>
<updated>2010-12-09T16:18:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Saul Wold</name>
<email>sgw@linux.intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2010-12-08T04:06:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/poky.git/commit/?id=3d08b9f2c65835822b1c0ed30e3170f02f877ce3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3d08b9f2c65835822b1c0ed30e3170f02f877ce3</id>
<content type='text'>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold &lt;sgw@linux.intel.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Major layout change to the packages directory</title>
<updated>2010-08-27T14:29:45+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Richard Purdie</name>
<email>rpurdie@linux.intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2010-08-27T14:14:24+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/poky.git/commit/?id=29d6678fd546377459ef75cf54abeef5b969b5cf'/>
<id>urn:sha1:29d6678fd546377459ef75cf54abeef5b969b5cf</id>
<content type='text'>
Having one monolithic packages directory makes it hard to find things
and is generally overwhelming. This commit splits it into several
logical sections roughly based on function, recipes.txt gives more
information about the classifications used.

The opportunity is also used to switch from "packages" to "recipes"
as used in OpenEmbedded as the term "packages" can be confusing to
people and has many different meanings.

Not all recipes have been classified yet, this is just a first pass
at separating things out. Some packages are moved to meta-extras as
they're no longer actively used or maintained.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie &lt;rpurdie@linux.intel.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
