linux/poky.git/meta/lib/oe/rootfs.py, branch yocto-2.3.2

rootfs.py: Respect OPKGLIBDIR variable

2017-03-24T23:43:32+00:00

* when OPKGLIBDIR doesn't have the default /var/lib value it will silently fail to copy package database from normal rootfs to debugfs rootfs and then when trying to install *-dbg complimentary packages it won't install anything, because installed_pkgs.txt file generated from debugfs is empty (From OE-Core rev: bebdb056c8bd0efc056f07b275a154e5d5a3aa2b) Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

rootfs_rpm.bbclass: migrate image creation to dnf

2017-03-14T14:42:17+00:00

To properly look at this patch, you probably need a side-by-side diff viewing tool. (From OE-Core rev: 65581c68d130fa74d703f6c3c92560e053857ac7) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

package_manager.py: improve the API for insert_feed_uris()

2017-03-14T14:42:17+00:00

No need to store the configuration as class members, just pass it directly into the method. (From OE-Core rev: a5cc38481be3c5e6ccbecf951f9fdc049e5101d5) Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

kernel, license, sstate, rootfs.py: Remove deploy directory README

2017-03-01T11:17:45+00:00

It isn't clear that the README_-_DO_NOT_DELETE_FILES_IN_THIS_DIRECTORY.txt file in the deploy directory warrants the complexity it brings elsewhere. Let's just remove it entirely. In particular, if two do_image_complete tasks run in parallel they risk both trying to put their image into ${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE} at the same time. Both will contain a README_-_DO_NOT_DELETE_FILES_IN_THIS_DIRECTORY.txt file. In theory this should be safe because "cp -alf" will just cause one to overwrite the other. Unfortunately, coreutils cp also has a race[1] which means that if one copy creates the file at just the wrong point the other will fail with: cp: cannot create hard link ‘..../tmp-glibc/deploy/images/pantera/README_-_DO_NOT_DELETE_FILES_IN_THIS_D.txt’ to +‘..../tmp-glibc/work/rage_against-oe-linux-gnueabi/my-own-image/1.0-r0/deploy-my-own-image-complete/README_-_DO_NOT_DELETE_FILES_IN_THIS_DIRECTORY.txt’: File exists [1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25680 (From OE-Core rev: 71e9e88847d7000781642ea6187ebd8f40dfdcfe) Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

classes/oeqa: Replace subprocess.check_call() with check_output()

2017-01-23T23:30:57+00:00

If you use subprocess.check_output() the traceback will contain the output when the command fails which is very useful for debugging. There is no good reason not to use this everywhere. (From OE-Core rev: ad750dd1cc9d789abe723daddd098ce41d8547f5) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

lib/oe/rootfs: reliably handle alternative symlinks

2017-01-16T18:05:14+00:00

When removing unneeded packages from a (read-only) rootfs during rootfs creation, alternative symlinks from those packages may or may not be removed. The reason is as follows: update-alternatives(-native) is used during package installation as part of the image creation. It uses a database which contains entries for all the alternative symlinks possible, and the -native version uses the target's database by means of $OPKG_OFFLINE_ROOT, i.e. the rootfs we're in the process of creating. Once the rootfs has been created, OE removes certain packages because we have a read-only rootfs - in particular ROOTFS_RO_UNNEEDED which includes VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_update-alternatives, i.e. the update-alternatives. Recently, a change was made in OE, where uninstallation of update-alternatives from the rootfs causes removal of its database, too, to save space (700KiB (uncompressed) in a busybox system) b24a63d71b517af701dfedbc7f7b541d25af708f http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb?id=b24a63d71b517af701dfedbc7f7b541d25af708f Following from that, if update-alternatives is removed from the target file system, update-alternatives-native has no database anymore, meaning it can't manage any of the alternative symlinks anymore. Because the order of packages to uninstall is non-deterministic, and update-alternatives could well be removed before any packages that use the mechanism provided, sometimes the extra symlinks are removed, sometimes not. By sorting the list of packages to be removed such that update-alternatives is removed last, we can ensure that that tings work reliably. (Certainly opkg seems to uninstall packages in the order given on the command line.) [YOCTO #10916] (From OE-Core rev: 5263dd3eac9d9fbdb7ef654d0cd532c192baed16) Signed-off-by: André Draszik Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

rootfs: don't put /usr/lib/ssl and /etc into debugfs

2017-01-16T18:05:13+00:00

The /etc and /usr/lib/ssl directories were only put into the opkg-generated debugfs because of a bug in opkg which means that a conffile has to exist if we're running 'opkg status'. This is now fixed, so the workaround can be reverted. (From OE-Core rev: 7267b1f6fa25e290eac070263355aa7f30b2ebcb) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

meta: remove True option to getVar calls

2016-12-16T10:23:23+00:00

getVar() now defaults to expanding by default, thus remove the True option from getVar() calls with a regex search and replace. Search made with the following regex: getVar ?$( ?[^,()]*), True$ (From OE-Core rev: 7c552996597faaee2fbee185b250c0ee30ea3b5f) Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

classes/image: suppress log_check mechanism for warnings/errors logged through BitBake

2016-12-14T12:30:49+00:00

If you printed a warning through bb.warn() / bbwarn or an error through bb.error() / bberror, this was also being picked up by our log_check mechanism that was designed to pick up warnings and errors printed by other programs used during do_rootfs. This meant you saw not only the warning or error itself, you saw it a second time through log_check, which is a bit ugly. Use the just-added BB_TASK_LOGGER to access the logger and add a handler that we can use to find out if any warning or error we find in the logs is one we should ignore as it has already been printed. Fixes [YOCTO #8223]. (From OE-Core rev: fb37304d27857df3c53c0867e81fbc8899b48089) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

lib/oe/rootfs: fix log_check warnings being printed twice with RPM packaging

2016-12-14T12:30:49+00:00

We were calling _log_check() in the RPM-specific rootfs class as well as in the base class; this is unnecessary and resulted in any errors/warnings generated during the actual package installation time triggering two warnings instead of one. Drop the call from RpmRootfs._create() to fix this. (From OE-Core rev: 541c56d755ba0354297673e857628026ad9e4df2) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie