linux/poky.git/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/data.py, branch warrior-21.0.3

bitbake: bitbake: Drop duplicate license boilerplace text

2019-06-19T17:04:01+00:00

With the introduction of SPDX-License-Identifier headers, we don't need a ton of header boilerplate in every file. Simplify the files and rely on the top level for the full licence text. (Bitbake rev: 34ed28a412af642a993642c14bd8b95d5ef22cd8) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: bitbake: Add initial pass of SPDX license headers to source code

2019-06-19T17:04:01+00:00

This adds the SPDX-License-Identifier license headers to the majority of our source files to make it clearer exactly which license files are under. The bulk of the files are under GPL v2.0 with one found to be under V2.0 or later, some under MIT and some have dual license. There are some files which are potentially harder to classify where we've imported upstream code and those can be handled specifically in later commits. The COPYING file is replaced with LICENSE.X files which contain the full license texts. (Bitbake rev: ac556588fac55e91b7ce4839a975eb9ebb5aa192) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: tests.data: Add underscore+numeric in overrides datastore test

2019-01-08T11:16:03+00:00

Add a test for x86_64 in overrides where is was being incorrectly handled. There was a previous fix (3a3be518536acc868c7eeb3c1111ad1b321480b7) but this ensures we don't regress. (Bitbake rev: 08c314eac231ac9292c8c95f1c5a6fc2023fe749) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: data_smart: Fix removal handling interaction issue with overrides

2018-10-20T13:27:03+00:00

If a variable has a _remove applied to it but that variable is in turn 'renamed' through OVERRIDES, the removal gets lost with the current code. TEST = "foo" TEST_someval = "bar" TEST_someval_remove = "bar" OVERRIDES = "someval" currently gives "bar" for TEST but should give "". This fixes the code to track the removal and adds a test case to ensure this doesn't regress again. (Bitbake rev: 8f55010c18057be040f073d8bcb4c5c2c311d809) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: test/data: Add new tests for task checksum changing/not changing

2018-10-18T09:59:27+00:00

This adds some basic tests for task checksums to ensure that the checksums: * change when variables change * change when active _remove operators are present * don't change when the _remove operators are not active * change when an active contains() expression is present * dont' change a contains() expression isn't active There is a lot of other functionality which should be added to this test but its a start. (Bitbake rev: 5463c16e3619d324aed137f47f93f0997a227d29) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: data: Fix whitespace on _remove operations

2018-10-18T09:59:26+00:00

We have some slightly odd behaviours with the current implementation of _remove operations. For example: TEST = " A B" TEST_remove = "C" would trigger TEST to become "A B" even thought it doesn't contain "C". In particular, this means that an inactive remove operator added in a bbappend could change the task checksum which is not desireable. Fix the operation to preserve whitespace, adding new tests to make this explict and test further corner cases. Also update the manual to match. (Bitbake rev: c0a23dd9155c50a6b7df796980bc7b612cac7994) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: data_smart: Ensure _remove operations on newly set variables are cleared

2017-04-12T14:09:58+00:00

We clear append/prepend on newly set variables, we should also clear remove operations. If we don't do this, there is no way we can actually delete a remove operation. Bitbake internally uses parsing=True to avoid these side effects when making its own internal calls. Also add a testcase to bitbake-selftest to ensure we remain consistent going forward from here. (Bitbake rev: 3a319f079d699c870d8531e051ab65e6278d1fa5) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: data_smart: implement missing remote datastore operations

2017-03-22T11:35:22+00:00

Enable the following operations from a remote datastore to affect the other end: * setVarFlag() * delVar() * delVarFlag() * renameVar() In practice I don't expect these to be used much, but they should be present so that the implementation is at least reasonably filled out and that the tests pass. Also add tests for the interface, mostly by subclassing the existing local test classes so that they are using a remote datastore. (These don't actually test remote usage via tinfoil, just that the datastore's interface can be used.) (Bitbake rev: 282dc0719d22a39df746eea762ebe05c66aa8f8a) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: tinfoil: fix override handling in remote datastores

2017-03-22T11:35:22+00:00

There was a huge gap in the remote datastore code introduced in the tinfoil2 rework - we weren't handling overrides at all, since these are stored separately from the actual data in the DataSmart object. Thus, when a datastore actually represents a remote datastore we need to go back to that remote datastore to get the override data as well, so introduce code to do that. To avoid a second round-trip I had to modify the _findVar() function to return the override data as well. This will increase the overhead a little when that data is superfluous, but without making the function even uglier I don't think there's a way to avoid that. (Bitbake rev: 4f9d6f060ed247fb6fa2f45668a892a1788d3f91) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: tests/data: Add inactive remove override test

2017-03-16T22:12:07+00:00

In 2bc4d35fb32defc59cd6ed1fc87e35924c201a5c we fixed cases where an inactive remove override was influecing the value of a variable. This adds a test case for this issue. (Bitbake rev: 1ff9b3c669fa187f152de7b8b57d14c2468d926c) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie