linux/poky.git/bitbake/lib/bb/tests/data.py, branch uninative-2.1

bitbake: data_smart: Ensure _remove operations on newly set variables are cleared

2017-04-12T14:09:58+00:00

We clear append/prepend on newly set variables, we should also clear remove operations. If we don't do this, there is no way we can actually delete a remove operation. Bitbake internally uses parsing=True to avoid these side effects when making its own internal calls. Also add a testcase to bitbake-selftest to ensure we remain consistent going forward from here. (Bitbake rev: 3a319f079d699c870d8531e051ab65e6278d1fa5) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: data_smart: implement missing remote datastore operations

2017-03-22T11:35:22+00:00

Enable the following operations from a remote datastore to affect the other end: * setVarFlag() * delVar() * delVarFlag() * renameVar() In practice I don't expect these to be used much, but they should be present so that the implementation is at least reasonably filled out and that the tests pass. Also add tests for the interface, mostly by subclassing the existing local test classes so that they are using a remote datastore. (These don't actually test remote usage via tinfoil, just that the datastore's interface can be used.) (Bitbake rev: 282dc0719d22a39df746eea762ebe05c66aa8f8a) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: tinfoil: fix override handling in remote datastores

2017-03-22T11:35:22+00:00

There was a huge gap in the remote datastore code introduced in the tinfoil2 rework - we weren't handling overrides at all, since these are stored separately from the actual data in the DataSmart object. Thus, when a datastore actually represents a remote datastore we need to go back to that remote datastore to get the override data as well, so introduce code to do that. To avoid a second round-trip I had to modify the _findVar() function to return the override data as well. This will increase the overhead a little when that data is superfluous, but without making the function even uglier I don't think there's a way to avoid that. (Bitbake rev: 4f9d6f060ed247fb6fa2f45668a892a1788d3f91) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: tests/data: Add inactive remove override test

2017-03-16T22:12:07+00:00

In 2bc4d35fb32defc59cd6ed1fc87e35924c201a5c we fixed cases where an inactive remove override was influecing the value of a variable. This adds a test case for this issue. (Bitbake rev: 1ff9b3c669fa187f152de7b8b57d14c2468d926c) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: lib: Drop now unneeded update_data calls

2017-02-16T04:08:15+00:00

Now that the datastore works dynamically we don't need the update_data calls so we can just remove them. They're not actually done anything at all for a while. (Bitbake rev: 2300beb50333bb620013b058a7309e7f2042101d) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: bitbake: remove True option to getVar calls (take 2)

2016-12-16T10:23:24+00:00

getVar() now defaults to expanding by default, thus remove the True option from getVar() calls with a regex search and replace. Search made with the following regex: getVar ?$( ?[^,()]*), True$ (a follow on patch to fix up a few recent introductions) (Bitbake rev: f9961fd5beb31d5ab9656a5be59f7ab3effef2f0) Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: data_smart: support serialisation

2016-12-14T12:25:07+00:00

The COW object used within VariableHistory can't be serialised itself, but we can convert it to a dict when serializing and then back when deserialising. This finally allows DataSmart objects to be serialized. NOTE: "serialisation" here means pickling, not over XMLRPC or any other transport. (Bitbake rev: bbbb2a53d5decf3b613a92c4ff77c84bfc5d4903) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: tinfoil: pass datastore to server when expanding python references

2016-12-14T12:25:07+00:00

If you're expanding a value that refers to the value of a variable in python code, we need to ensure that the datastore that gets used to get the value of that variable is the client-side datastore and not just the part of it that's on the server side. For example, suppose you are in client code doing the following: d.setVar('HELLO', 'there') result = d.expand('${@d.getVar("HELLO", True)}') result should be "there" but if the client part wasn't taken into account, it would be whatever value HELLO had in the server portion of the datastore (if any). (Bitbake rev: cbc22a0a9aadc8606b927dbac0f1407ec2736b35) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: data_smart: implement remote datastore functionality

2016-12-14T12:25:07+00:00

This allows you to maintain a local reference to a remote datastore. The actual implementation of the remote connection is delegated to a connector object that the caller must define and supply. There is support for getting variable values and expanding python references (i.e. ${@...} remotely, however setting variables remotely is not supported - any variable setting is done locally as if the datastore were a copy (which it kind of is). Loosely based on an earlier prototype implementation by Qing He. (Bitbake rev: a3edc3eefa2d03c4ad5d12187b32fa4dc495082a) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

bitbake: bitbake: remove True option to getVar calls

2016-11-30T15:48:09+00:00

getVar() now defaults to expanding by default, thus remove the True option from getVar() calls with a regex search and replace. Search made with the following regex: getVar ?$( ?[^,()]*), True$ (Bitbake rev: 3b45c479de8640f92dd1d9f147b02e1eecfaadc8) Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie