linux/meta-openembedded.git/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/ttf-fonts/ttf-mplus_027.bb, branch langdale-next

Fix DeprecationWarning about regexps

2022-02-22T02:12:04+00:00

* fixes: meta-oe/meta-networking/recipes-support/strongswan/strongswan_5.9.4.bb:125: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. meta-oe/meta-networking/recipes-support/strongswan/strongswan_5.9.4.bb:126: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. meta-oe/meta-networking/recipes-support/strongswan/strongswan_5.9.4.bb:128: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. meta-oe/meta-networking/recipes-support/strongswan/strongswan_5.9.4.bb:129: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. meta-oe/meta-networking/recipes-support/strongswan/strongswan_5.9.4.bb:130: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. meta-oe/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/ttf-fonts/ttf-mplus_027.bb:18: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. meta-oe/meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/libcdio/libcdio-paranoia_10.2+2.0.1.bb:21: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. meta-oe/meta-oe/recipes-multimedia/libcdio/libcdio_2.1.0.bb:28: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1342: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1343: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \- oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1343: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1344: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1345: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1348: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1350: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1353: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1355: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1358: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1360: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. oe-core/meta/classes/package.bbclass:1365: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence \. Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa Signed-off-by: Khem Raj

Convert to new override syntax

2021-08-03T17:21:25+00:00

This is the result of automated script (0.9.1) conversion: oe-core/scripts/contrib/convert-overrides.py . converting the metadata to use ":" as the override character instead of "_". Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa

ttf-mplus, ttf-vlgothic: add ttf-mplus license

2019-05-24T17:11:28+00:00

* add meta-oe/licenses/ttf-mplus from ttf-mplus/027-r4/mplus-TESTFLIGHT-027/LICENSE_E * use BPN to use the same LICENSE even with multilib * use the same license name from ttf-vlgothic * fixes following warnings: WARNING: ttf-mplus-027-r4 do_populate_lic: ttf-mplus: No generic license file exists for: ttf-mplus in any provider WARNING: ttf-vlgothic-20141206-r0 do_populate_lic: ttf-vlgothic: No generic license file exists for: mplus in any provider Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa Signed-off-by: Khem Raj

ttf-mplus: use PACKAGESPLITFUNCS and add drop ttf-common dependency

2014-08-11T09:00:15+00:00

* there is only ttf-dejavu-common * fixes following warnings: ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-black rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-heavy rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1m-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1m-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1m-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1m-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1m-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1mn-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1mn-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1mn-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1mn-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1mn-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-black rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-heavy rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-black rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-heavy rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2m-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2m-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2m-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2m-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2m-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-black rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-heavy rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps] Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa

recipes: convert remaining SUMMARY/DESCRIPTION cosmetic issues

2014-02-23T22:20:02+00:00

Changes: - rename SUMMARY with length > 80 to DESCRIPTION - rename DESCRIPTION with length < 80 to (non present tag) SUMMARY - drop final point character at the end of SUMMARY string - remove trailing whitespace of SUMMARY line Note: don't bump PR Signed-off-by: Matthieu Crapet Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa

recipes: Unify indentation

2013-04-15T14:23:17+00:00

* This change is only aesthetic (unlike indentation in Python tasks). * Some recipes were using tabs. * Some were using 8 spaces. * Some were using mix or different number of spaces. * Make them consistently use 4 spaces everywhere. * Yocto styleguide advises to use tabs (but the only reason to keep tabs is the need to update a lot of recipes). Lately this advice was also merged into the styleguide on the OE wiki. * Using 4 spaces in both types of tasks is better because it's less error prone when someone is not sure if e.g. do_generate_toolchain_file() is Python or shell task and also allows to highlight every tab used in .bb, .inc, .bbappend, .bbclass as potentially bad (shouldn't be used for indenting of multiline variable assignments and cannot be used for Python tasks). * Don't indent closing quote on multiline variables we're quite inconsistent wheater it's first character on line under opening quote or under first non-whitespace character in previous line. Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa Acked-by: Koen Kooi

ttf-fonts: inherit oe-core's fontcache.bbclass instead of update-fonts

2013-02-16T04:52:37+00:00

Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa

ttf: introduce update-fonts bbclass and change all ttf recipes to use it

2013-02-06T14:16:01+00:00

* without this ttf.inc had to set RRECOMMENDS and postinst/postrm without PN suffix to cover all subpackages created in ttf recipes Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa

Replace bb.data.* with d.*

2012-10-28T14:32:06+00:00

Used sed expression given here: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-November/012373.html Plus an additional expression for .expand. Full expression is: sed \ -e 's:bb.data.\(setVar([^,]*,[^,]*\), \([^ )]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(setVarFlag([^,]*,[^,]*,[^,]*\), \([^) ]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(getVar([^,]*\), \([^, ]*\) *,\([^)]*\)):\2.\1,\3):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(getVarFlag([^,]*,[^,]*\), \([^, ]*\) *,\([^)]*\)):\2.\1,\3):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(getVarFlag([^,]*,[^,]*\), \([^) ]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(getVar([^,]*\), \([^) ]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \ -e 's:bb.data.\(expand([^,]*\), \([^ )]*\) *):\2.\1):g' \ -i `grep -ril bb.data *` Some minor correction in systemd.bbclass was needed for some expressions that didn't quite match the regex in the desired way; additionally a few instances were manually changed. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton

ttf-mplus: added license stuff

2012-10-10T07:47:32+00:00

Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz