From 73926e3059982da044b3466d488a09bd4bcb8a3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dima Zavin Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:40:13 -0800 Subject: license: clarify the licensing for the project's metadata Presently, the recipe files in meta-freescale are under an ambiguous license. There is a EULA file at the root, but it's clearly not meant to apply as the default license as it is only explicitly called out in a few recipes and mirrors the language of the LSDK. The yocto upstream projects are meant to be distributed under a more liberal license than the LSDK. There are several licenses listed is custom-licenses/, but those again only apply to specific recipes (e.g. NXP-Binary-EULA). The license for the recipes themselves (and for the layer metadata, etc.) is not clear and is problematic when attempting to host a mirror of this code. So, add a LICENSE file that describes this situation, and provide a reference copy of the MIT license (taken from poky/meta/). Signed-off-by: Dima Zavin Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- LICENSE | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 LICENSE (limited to 'LICENSE') diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE new file mode 100644 index 000000000..17964fe56 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +Different components of meta-freescale are under different licenses (a mix +of MIT and proprietary). Please see: + +COPYING.MIT (MIT) +custom-licenses/* (Various EULAs, included by recipes) + +All metadata is MIT licensed unless otherwise stated. Source code and binaries +included in tree for individual recipes are under the LICENSE stated in +the associated recipe (.bb file) unless otherwise stated. + +License information for any other files is either explicitly stated +or defaults to GPL version 2. -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf