<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux/meta-freescale.git/LICENSE, branch fix-boot-container</title>
<subtitle>Mirror of github.com/Freescale/meta-freescale</subtitle>
<id>https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/meta-freescale.git/atom?h=fix-boot-container</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/meta-freescale.git/atom?h=fix-boot-container'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/meta-freescale.git/'/>
<updated>2019-01-10T12:59:06+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>license: clarify the licensing for the project's metadata</title>
<updated>2019-01-10T12:59:06+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Dima Zavin</name>
<email>dmitriyz@waymo.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-12-19T08:40:13+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.enea.com/cgit/linux/meta-freescale.git/commit/?id=73926e3059982da044b3466d488a09bd4bcb8a3d'/>
<id>urn:sha1:73926e3059982da044b3466d488a09bd4bcb8a3d</id>
<content type='text'>
Presently, the recipe files in meta-freescale are under an ambiguous
license. There is a EULA file at the root, but it's clearly not meant
to apply as the default license as it is only explicitly called out in
a few recipes and mirrors the language of the LSDK. The yocto upstream
projects are meant to be distributed under a more liberal license than
the LSDK.

There are several licenses listed is custom-licenses/, but those again
only apply to specific recipes (e.g. NXP-Binary-EULA).

The license for the recipes themselves (and for the layer metadata, etc.)
is not clear and is problematic when attempting to host a mirror of this
code. So, add a LICENSE file that describes this situation, and provide
a reference copy of the MIT license (taken from poky/meta/).

Signed-off-by: Dima Zavin &lt;dmitriyz@waymo.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador &lt;otavio@ossystems.com.br&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
