From 9b46fbf79c27b3824d361f65a6ab339ddbfd75d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miruna Paun Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:27:49 +0100 Subject: Updated the Zabbix Config and added Ceph Storage Issue USERDOCAP-260, COSNOSCR-576 Signed-off-by: Miruna Paun --- .../doc/known_bugs_and_limitations.xml | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'book-enea-nfv-core-release-info') diff --git a/book-enea-nfv-core-release-info/doc/known_bugs_and_limitations.xml b/book-enea-nfv-core-release-info/doc/known_bugs_and_limitations.xml index 77d9264..ff2485f 100644 --- a/book-enea-nfv-core-release-info/doc/known_bugs_and_limitations.xml +++ b/book-enea-nfv-core-release-info/doc/known_bugs_and_limitations.xml @@ -284,15 +284,15 @@ - Virtual instances are not affected by removing a node from Ceph - Storage Cluster + Virtual instances are not affected by removing a node from the + Ceph Storage Cluster Description and Impact: - Engineering wanted to validate the survival of the storage - systems when a single disk is removed without causing data loss. + Engineering wanted to validate the survival of storage + systems when a single disk is removed, without causing data loss. Without physical access to the test setup, this test is not feasible. @@ -303,10 +303,9 @@ The chosen approach was to validate what happens to the - Ceph cluster when network connectivity is lost for the Storage - interface of one of the nodes. The observed behavior: no - impact on a running instance using Ceph for volume - storage. + Ceph cluster, when network connectivity is lost for the + Storage interface of one of the nodes. No impact was observed + when a running instance using Ceph for volume storage. -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf