summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/files/0011-Do-not-require-that-ELF-binaries-are-executable-to-b.patch
blob: c910a478eea19d1deedff6c28868e90195bee9c1 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
From d65d6e8760afbd7f70b22a1f3297a037bc475fea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Kjellerstedt <pkj@axis.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:21:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 11/13] Do not require that ELF binaries are executable to be
 identifiable

There is nothing that requires, e.g., a DSO to be executable, but it
is still an ELF binary and should be identified as such.

Upstream probably expects all ELF binaries to be marked as executable,
but rather than imposing such a limitation for OE, allow any file to
be identified as an ELF binary regardless of whether it is executable
or not.

Upstream-Status: Inappropriate
Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
---
 fileattrs/elf.attr | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fileattrs/elf.attr b/fileattrs/elf.attr
index 595b33e09..bac52649d 100644
--- a/fileattrs/elf.attr
+++ b/fileattrs/elf.attr
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
 %__elf_provides		%{_rpmconfigdir}/elfdeps --provides %{?__filter_GLIBC_PRIVATE:--filter-private}
 %__elf_requires		%{_rpmconfigdir}/elfdeps --requires %{?__filter_GLIBC_PRIVATE:--filter-private}
 %__elf_magic		^(setuid )?(setgid )?(sticky )?ELF (32|64)-bit.*$
-%__elf_flags		exeonly
-- 
2.12.0