From 4de6f9b17c6dd8d50ddb3050a091fae83e91bb71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew McClintock Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:23:23 +0000 Subject: oprofile: backport patches to fix ppc build issues Fixes: | operf_utils.cpp: In function 'bool _op_get_event_codes(std::vector*)': | operf_utils.cpp:151:21: error: 'pfm_initialize' was not declared in this scope | operf_utils.cpp:151:26: error: 'PFM_SUCCESS' was not declared in this scope | operf_utils.cpp:166:45: error: 'PFM_PLM3' was not declared in this scope | operf_utils.cpp:166:55: error: 'PFM_OS_NONE' was not declared in this scope | operf_utils.cpp:166:72: error: 'pfm_get_os_event_encoding' was not declared in this scope | operf_utils.cpp:167:14: error: 'PFM_SUCCESS' was not declared in this scope [YOCTO #3717] (From OE-Core rev: 121cb96964fe2f374d814bf39036119bd63b9589) Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- ...igure-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch | 163 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 163 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/oprofile/oprofile/0001-Fix-up-configure-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch (limited to 'meta/recipes-kernel/oprofile/oprofile/0001-Fix-up-configure-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch') diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/oprofile/oprofile/0001-Fix-up-configure-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch b/meta/recipes-kernel/oprofile/oprofile/0001-Fix-up-configure-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5e6d5de355 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/oprofile/oprofile/0001-Fix-up-configure-to-handle-architectures-that-do-not.patch @@ -0,0 +1,163 @@ +Upstream-Status: Backport + +From ca6d916a6f8f0f8abbb4c9b6a97dd1a1615bb124 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Maynard Johnson +Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:16:35 -0600 +Subject: [PATCH] Fix up configure to handle architectures that do not + implement perf_event_open + +This patch fixes the following problems: + +1) The configure script allows the user to pass a location to kernel +headers (via --with-kernel option) such that, even if the running +kernel does not have perf_events support, it may be possible to +build operf (e.g., in cross-compile environments). But the message +'This kernel does not have perf_events support; falling back to legacy +oprofile' was being displayed inappropriately in such cases. This +patch changes the configure script so that the "falling back to +legacy oprofile" message will only be displayed if we're running +on a kernel that does not have perf_events support AND the user +did not pass specify the "--with-kernel" option. + +2) Some architectures don't even implement the perf_event_open syscall, so the +configure script must do more than checking kernel version and whether or not +perf_event.h is present in order to decide if perf_events is supported. +This patch provides that extra capability. + +These problems were reported by Tony Jones . + +Signed-off-by: Maynard Johnson +--- + configure.ac | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- + utils/op_perf_events_checker.c | 6 ++-- + 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac +index 5c3d13d..89336ee 100644 +--- a/configure.ac ++++ b/configure.ac +@@ -70,34 +70,66 @@ KERNELDIR=$withval) + + + dnl Check kernel version for perf_events supported +-AC_MSG_CHECKING([kernel version supports perf_events]) + if test "$KERNELDIR" != ""; then + KINC="$KERNELDIR/include" +-fi +-AX_KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 31, <=, kernel_has_perf_events_support="yes", +-kernel_has_perf_events_support="no") +- +-if test "$kernel_has_perf_events_support" = "no"; then +- AC_MSG_RESULT([This kernel does not have perf_events support; falling back to legacy oprofile]) ++ PERF_EVENT_FLAGS=" -I$KERNELDIR/include" ++ AC_SUBST(PERF_EVENT_FLAGS) ++ PERF_EVENT_H="$KERNELDIR/include/linux/perf_event.h" + else +- AC_MSG_RESULT([This kernel has perf_events support]) ++ PERF_EVENT_H="/usr/include/linux/perf_event.h" + fi + +-if test "$KERNELDIR" == ""; then +- PERF_EVENT_H="/usr/include/linux/perf_event.h" ++PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS="no" ++kernel_may_have_perf_events_support="no" ++AX_KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 31, <=, kernel_may_have_perf_events_support="yes", ++kernel_has_perf_events_support="no") ++ ++dnl The AX_KERNEL_VERSION macro may return kernel_may_have_perf_events_support="yes", ++dnl indicating a partial answer. Some architectures do not implement the Performance ++dnl Events Kernel Subsystem even with kernel versions > 2.6.31 -- i.e., not even ++dnl implementing the perf_event_open syscall to return ENOSYS. So the check below ++dnl will identify and handle such situations. ++ ++if test "$kernel_may_have_perf_events_support" = "yes"; then ++ AC_CHECK_HEADER($PERF_EVENT_H,PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS="yes") ++ AC_MSG_CHECKING([kernel supports perf_events]) ++ if test "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS" = "yes"; then ++ rm -f test-for-PERF_EVENT_OPEN ++ AC_LANG_CONFTEST( ++ [AC_LANG_PROGRAM([[#include ++ #include ++ #include ++ #include ++ ]], ++ [[struct perf_event_attr attr; ++ pid_t pid; ++ memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr)); ++ attr.size = sizeof(attr); ++ attr.sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_IP; ++ pid = getpid(); ++ syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, pid, 0, -1, 0); ++ ]]) ++ ]) ++ $CC conftest.$ac_ext $CFLAGS $LDFLAGS $LIBS $PERF_EVENT_FLAGS -o test-for-PERF_EVENT_OPEN > /dev/null 2>&1 ++ if test -f test-for-PERF_EVENT_OPEN; then ++ kernel_has_perf_events_support="yes" ++ AC_MSG_RESULT(yes) ++ else ++ AC_MSG_RESULT(no) ++ kernel_has_perf_events_support="no" ++ fi ++ else ++ AC_MSG_RESULT(unknown -- perf_event.h not found) ++ fi + else +- PERF_EVENT_H="$KERNELDIR/include/linux/perf_event.h" ++ AC_MSG_RESULT(kernel supports perf_events... no) ++ kernel_has_perf_events_support="no" + fi +-AC_CHECK_HEADER($PERF_EVENT_H,PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS="yes") +-AM_CONDITIONAL(BUILD_FOR_PERF_EVENT, test -n "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS") +-if test "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS" = "yes"; then +- HAVE_PERF_EVENTS='1' + +- if test "$KERNELDIR" != ""; then +- PERF_EVENT_FLAGS=" -I$KERNELDIR/include" +- AC_SUBST(PERF_EVENT_FLAGS) +- fi ++AM_CONDITIONAL(BUILD_FOR_PERF_EVENT, test "$kernel_has_perf_events_support" = "yes") + ++if test "$kernel_has_perf_events_support" = "yes"; then ++ HAVE_PERF_EVENTS='1' + AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL is defined in perf_event.h]) + rm -f test-for-PERF_GUEST + AC_LANG_CONFTEST( +@@ -117,7 +149,9 @@ if test "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS" = "yes"; then + rm -f test-for-PERF_GUEST* + else + HAVE_PERF_EVENTS='0' ++ AC_MSG_RESULT([No perf_events support available; falling back to legacy oprofile]) + fi ++ + AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(HAVE_PERF_EVENTS, $HAVE_PERF_EVENTS, [Kernel support for perf_events exists]) + + if test "$HAVE_PERF_EVENTS" = "1"; then +@@ -433,7 +467,7 @@ elif test "`getent passwd oprofile 2>/dev/null`" == "" || \ + fi + fi + +-if test "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS" != "yes" && test "$kernel_has_perf_events_support" = "yes"; then ++if test "$PERF_EVENT_H_EXISTS" != "yes" && test "$kernel_may_have_perf_events_support" = "yes"; then + echo "Warning: perf_event.h not found. Either install the kernel headers package or" + echo "use the --with-kernel option if you want the non-root, single application" + echo "profiling support provided by operf." +diff --git a/utils/op_perf_events_checker.c b/utils/op_perf_events_checker.c +index 519cafa..74a410e 100644 +--- a/utils/op_perf_events_checker.c ++++ b/utils/op_perf_events_checker.c +@@ -49,8 +49,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) + } + + #if HAVE_PERF_EVENTS +- /* If perf_events syscall is not implemented, the syscall below will fail +- * with ENOSYS (38). If implemented, but the processor type on which this ++ /* Even if the perf_event_open syscall is implemented, the architecture may still ++ * not provide a full implementation of the perf_events subsystem, in which case, ++ * the syscall below will fail with ENOSYS (38). If the perf_events subsystem is ++ * implemented for the architecture, but the processor type on which this + * program is running is not supported by perf_events, the syscall returns + * ENOENT (2). + */ +-- +1.7.9.7 + -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf