From 972dcfcdbfe75dcfeb777150c136576cf1a71e99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tudor Florea Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 22:59:03 +0200 Subject: initial commit for Enea Linux 5.0 arm Signed-off-by: Tudor Florea --- ...kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch (limited to 'meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools') diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ab1fe96db2 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/kexec/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-Refine-kdump-device_tree-sort.patch @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +kexec-tools: Refine kdump device_tree sort + +The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and +assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but +acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump, the order of +serial node still is changed. So the patch is to sort these entries +by the directory name in ascending order. + +Upstream-Status: Pending + +Signed-off-by: Yang Wei +Signed-off-by: Chong Lu +--- + kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c | 13 ++++++++++--- + kexec/fs2dt.c | 13 ++++++++++--- + 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c b/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c +index 4121c7d..cc04b04 100644 +--- a/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c ++++ b/kexec/arch/ppc/fs2dt.c +@@ -296,6 +296,9 @@ static int comparefunc(const void *dentry1, const void *dentry2) + { + char *str1 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry1)->d_name; + char *str2 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry2)->d_name; ++ char* ptr1 = strchr(str1, '@'); ++ char* ptr2 = strchr(str2, '@'); ++ int len1, len2; + + /* + * strcmp scans from left to right and fails to idetify for some +@@ -303,9 +306,13 @@ static int comparefunc(const void *dentry1, const void *dentry2) + * Therefore, we get the wrong sorted order like memory@10000000 and + * memory@f000000. + */ +- if (strchr(str1, '@') && strchr(str2, '@') && +- (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) +- return 1; ++ if (ptr1 && ptr2) { ++ len1 = ptr1 - str1; ++ len2 = ptr2 - str2; ++ if (!strncmp(str1, str2, len1 >len2 ? len1: len2) && ++ (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) ++ return 1; ++ } + + return strcmp(str1, str2); + } +diff --git a/kexec/fs2dt.c b/kexec/fs2dt.c +index 5e6b98d..1c0345b 100644 +--- a/kexec/fs2dt.c ++++ b/kexec/fs2dt.c +@@ -475,6 +475,9 @@ static int comparefunc(const struct dirent **dentry1, + { + char *str1 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry1)->d_name; + char *str2 = (*(struct dirent **)dentry2)->d_name; ++ char* ptr1 = strchr(str1, '@'); ++ char* ptr2 = strchr(str2, '@'); ++ int len1, len2; + + /* + * strcmp scans from left to right and fails to idetify for some +@@ -482,9 +485,13 @@ static int comparefunc(const struct dirent **dentry1, + * Therefore, we get the wrong sorted order like memory@10000000 and + * memory@f000000. + */ +- if (strchr(str1, '@') && strchr(str2, '@') && +- (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) +- return 1; ++ if (ptr1 && ptr2) { ++ len1 = ptr1 - str1; ++ len2 = ptr2 - str2; ++ if (!strncmp(str1, str2, len1 >len2 ? len1: len2) && ++ (strlen(str1) > strlen(str2))) ++ return 1; ++ } + + return strcmp(str1, str2); + } +-- +1.7.9.5 + -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf