From 55ebfb1909da3d63afb63c890abbd161e84f12ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Watt Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:45:04 -0500 Subject: libpam: Use specific BSD license variant Make the license more accurate by specifying the specific variant of BSD license instead of the generic one. This helps with SPDX license attribution as "BSD" is not a valid SPDX license. (From OE-Core rev: d9948d0439cf26af9f570e9a9d0d214294bae504) Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.5.1.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'meta/recipes-extended/pam') diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.5.1.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.5.1.bb index a349d8ac96..efcd27137f 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.5.1.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.5.1.bb @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ SECTION = "base" # PAM is dual licensed under GPL and BSD. # /etc/pam.d comes from Debian libpam-runtime in 2009-11 (at that time # libpam-runtime-1.0.1 is GPLv2+), by openembedded -LICENSE = "GPLv2+ | BSD" +LICENSE = "GPLv2+ | BSD-3-Clause" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7eb5c1bf854e8881005d673599ee74d3 \ file://libpamc/License;md5=a4da476a14c093fdc73be3c3c9ba8fb3 \ " -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf