From 88d141e9de1f130a3ad9e78fe8066a2ba7114360 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Eggleton Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 16:22:03 +1300 Subject: openssl: correct license comment The comment here stated that openssl is dual-licensed, but that would mean that either of the two licenses could be used which is *not* the case [1]. However LICENSE = "openssl" *is* correct because in OE that maps to a generic license file which includes both licenses, which makes sense because there isn't really any such thing as OpenSSL that would be covered by the "OpenSSL license" and not the "SSLeay license". Correct the comment to avoid any confusion. [1] https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html (From OE-Core rev: 6c821ce6ecae789320b31ec55c83907d6dd78359) Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1.bb | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl') diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1.bb b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1.bb index 0351858687..0d80aba64d 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1.bb @@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ HOMEPAGE = "http://www.openssl.org/" BUGTRACKER = "http://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html" SECTION = "libs/network" -# "openssl | SSLeay" dual license +# "openssl" here actually means both OpenSSL and SSLeay licenses apply +# (see meta/files/common-licenses/OpenSSL to which "openssl" is SPDXLICENSEMAPped) LICENSE = "openssl" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://LICENSE;md5=d57d511030c9d66ef5f5966bee5a7eff" -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf