From 17bd442f1a36ae531ddd5858131dc12815640db3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Watt Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:04:44 -0500 Subject: lib/oe/spdx.py: Add comments Adds several comments to this file to explain the intention and how it should be used (From OE-Core rev: 0be0ba70e68b57a3617d3c1ea4b6233b37d5d648) Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- meta/lib/oe/spdx.py | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) (limited to 'meta/lib/oe/spdx.py') diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/spdx.py b/meta/lib/oe/spdx.py index a99e54ff40..4416194e06 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oe/spdx.py +++ b/meta/lib/oe/spdx.py @@ -2,6 +2,18 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only # +# +# This library is intended to capture the JSON SPDX specification in a type +# safe manner. It is not intended to encode any particular OE specific +# behaviors, see the sbom.py for that. +# +# The documented SPDX spec document doesn't cover the JSON syntax for +# particular configuration, which can make it hard to determine what the JSON +# syntax should be. I've found it is actually much simpler to read the official +# SPDX JSON schema which can be found here: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec +# in schemas/spdx-schema.json +# + import hashlib import itertools import json @@ -9,7 +21,16 @@ import json SPDX_VERSION = "2.2" +# +# The following are the support classes that are used to implement SPDX object +# + class _Property(object): + """ + A generic SPDX object property. The different types will derive from this + class + """ + def __init__(self, *, default=None): self.default = default @@ -19,6 +40,10 @@ class _Property(object): class _String(_Property): + """ + A scalar string property for an SPDX object + """ + def __init__(self, **kwargs): super().__init__(**kwargs) @@ -39,6 +64,10 @@ class _String(_Property): class _Object(_Property): + """ + A scalar SPDX object property of a SPDX object + """ + def __init__(self, cls, **kwargs): super().__init__(**kwargs) self.cls = cls @@ -62,6 +91,10 @@ class _Object(_Property): class _ListProperty(_Property): + """ + A list of SPDX properties + """ + def __init__(self, prop, **kwargs): super().__init__(**kwargs) self.prop = prop @@ -82,16 +115,28 @@ class _ListProperty(_Property): class _StringList(_ListProperty): + """ + A list of strings as a property for an SPDX object + """ + def __init__(self, **kwargs): super().__init__(_String(), **kwargs) class _ObjectList(_ListProperty): + """ + A list of SPDX objects as a property for an SPDX object + """ + def __init__(self, cls, **kwargs): super().__init__(_Object(cls), **kwargs) class MetaSPDXObject(type): + """ + A metaclass that allows properties (anything derived from a _Property + class) to be defined for a SPDX object + """ def __new__(mcls, name, bases, attrs): attrs["_properties"] = {} @@ -105,6 +150,9 @@ class MetaSPDXObject(type): class SPDXObject(metaclass=MetaSPDXObject): + """ + The base SPDX object; all SPDX spec classes must derive from this class + """ def __init__(self, **d): self._spdx = {} @@ -122,6 +170,15 @@ class SPDXObject(metaclass=MetaSPDXObject): return raise KeyError("%r is not a valid SPDX property" % name) +# +# These are the SPDX objects implemented from the spec. The *only* properties +# that can be added to these objects are ones directly specified in the SPDX +# spec, however you may add helper functions to make operations easier. +# +# Defaults should *only* be specified if the SPDX spec says there is a certain +# required value for a field (e.g. dataLicense), or if the field is mandatory +# and has some sane "this field is unknown" (e.g. "NOASSERTION") +# class SPDXAnnotation(SPDXObject): annotationDate = _String() -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf