From 013de192d746809e397b1c6de22bddf9ed34185f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Jansa Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 18:11:18 +0100 Subject: package.bbclass: Fix support for private libs * n is a tuple since this commit: commit d3aa7668a9f001044d0a0f1ba2de425a36056102 Author: Richard Purdie Date: Mon Jul 7 18:41:23 2014 +0100 Subject package.bbclass: Improve shlibs needed data structure since then 'n in private_libs' was always false and private libs were always processed * this is bad when we have libfoo in private libs, but also some package providing libfoo, that way we ship own libfoo.so, but together with runtime dependency on package providing libfoo (From OE-Core rev: ec1d379683cedca4be1c252475d02c8041227142) Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa Signed-off-by: Ross Burton Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- meta/classes/package.bbclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'meta/classes/package.bbclass') diff --git a/meta/classes/package.bbclass b/meta/classes/package.bbclass index fc501fcdea..31c9e080ed 100644 --- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass @@ -1574,7 +1574,7 @@ python package_do_shlibs() { # /opt/abc/lib/libfoo.so.1 and contains /usr/bin/abc depending on system library libfoo.so.1 # but skipping it is still better alternative than providing own # version and then adding runtime dependency for the same system library - if private_libs and n in private_libs: + if private_libs and n[0] in private_libs: bb.debug(2, '%s: Dependency %s covered by PRIVATE_LIBS' % (pkg, n[0])) continue if n[0] in shlib_provider.keys(): -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf