From 57044b9a6240235a403eac4067e2e2113e03b6eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Larson Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:42:28 -0700 Subject: Implement ??= operator ??= is a lazy, conditional assignment. Whereas a ?= immediately assigns to the variable if the variable has not yet been set, ??= does not apply the default assignment until the end of the parse. As a result, the final ??= for a given variable is used, as opposed to the first as in ?=. Note that the initial implementation relies upon finalise() to apply the defaults, so a "bitbake -e" without specifying a recipe will not show the defaults as set by ??=. Moving application of the default into getVar adds too large a performance hit. We may want to revisit this later. (Bitbake rev: 74f50fbca194c9c72bd2a540f4b9de458cb08e2d) Signed-off-by: Chris Larson Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- bitbake/lib/bb/parse/parse_py/ConfHandler.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'bitbake/lib/bb/parse/parse_py/ConfHandler.py') diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/parse/parse_py/ConfHandler.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/parse/parse_py/ConfHandler.py index a1eaf317ac..f4f85de245 100644 --- a/bitbake/lib/bb/parse/parse_py/ConfHandler.py +++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/parse/parse_py/ConfHandler.py @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ import re, bb.data, os, sys from bb.parse import ParseError, resolve_file, ast #__config_regexp__ = re.compile( r"(?Pexport\s*)?(?P[a-zA-Z0-9\-_+.${}]+)\s*(?P:)?(?P\?)?=\s*(?P['\"]?)(?P.*)(?P=apo)$") -__config_regexp__ = re.compile( r"(?Pexport\s*)?(?P[a-zA-Z0-9\-_+.${}/]+)(\[(?P[a-zA-Z0-9\-_+.]+)\])?\s*((?P:=)|(?P\?=)|(?P\+=)|(?P=\+)|(?P=\.)|(?P\.=)|=)\s*(?P['\"]?)(?P.*)(?P=apo)$") +__config_regexp__ = re.compile( r"(?Pexport\s*)?(?P[a-zA-Z0-9\-_+.${}/]+)(\[(?P[a-zA-Z0-9\-_+.]+)\])?\s*((?P:=)|(?P\?\?=)|(?P\?=)|(?P\+=)|(?P=\+)|(?P=\.)|(?P\.=)|=)\s*(?P['\"]?)(?P.*)(?P=apo)$") __include_regexp__ = re.compile( r"include\s+(.+)" ) __require_regexp__ = re.compile( r"require\s+(.+)" ) __export_regexp__ = re.compile( r"export\s+(.+)" ) -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf