From 39ec0738d4bdc566eca2724dc35c557955042242 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Javier Viguera Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:34:50 +0200 Subject: eglibc: security fix CVE-2015-7547 CVE-2015-7547: getaddrinfo() stack-based buffer overflow Backport patch from GLIBC-2.20 to EGLIBC-2.19. (From OE-Core rev: a4e80e831cd13e6418af0d770c5dbd5b9270eaa5) Signed-off-by: Javier Viguera Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- .../eglibc/eglibc-2.19/CVE-2015-7547.patch | 585 +++++++++++++++++++++ meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.19.bb | 1 + 2 files changed, 586 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.19/CVE-2015-7547.patch diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.19/CVE-2015-7547.patch b/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.19/CVE-2015-7547.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2a52e56cb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-2.19/CVE-2015-7547.patch @@ -0,0 +1,585 @@ +From: Carlos O'Donell +Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:26:37 -0500 +Subject: [PATCH] CVE-2015-7547: getaddrinfo() stack-based buffer overflow (Bug + 18665). + +* A stack-based buffer overflow was found in libresolv when invoked from + libnss_dns, allowing specially crafted DNS responses to seize control + of execution flow in the DNS client. The buffer overflow occurs in + the functions send_dg (send datagram) and send_vc (send TCP) for the + NSS module libnss_dns.so.2 when calling getaddrinfo with AF_UNSPEC + family. The use of AF_UNSPEC triggers the low-level resolver code to + send out two parallel queries for A and AAAA. A mismanagement of the + buffers used for those queries could result in the response of a query + writing beyond the alloca allocated buffer created by + _nss_dns_gethostbyname4_r. Buffer management is simplified to remove + the overflow. Thanks to the Google Security Team and Red Hat for + reporting the security impact of this issue, and Robert Holiday of + Ciena for reporting the related bug 18665. (CVE-2015-7547) + +See also: +https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-02/msg00416.html +https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-02/msg00418.html + +Upstream-Status: Backport +CVE: CVE-2015-7547 + +Upstream commit: +https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=16d0a0ce7613552301786bf05d7eba8784b5732c + +Tweaks: +* Adapted from GLIBC-2.20 to EGLIBC-2.19 +* Removed changes to ChangeLog and NEWS files + +Signed-off-by: Javier Viguera +--- + resolv/nss_dns/dns-host.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++- + resolv/res_query.c | 3 + + resolv/res_send.c | 257 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- + 3 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/resolv/nss_dns/dns-host.c b/resolv/nss_dns/dns-host.c +index f8f192e5afb5..e7e2c7137a50 100644 +--- a/resolv/nss_dns/dns-host.c ++++ b/resolv/nss_dns/dns-host.c +@@ -1049,7 +1049,10 @@ gaih_getanswer_slice (const querybuf *answer, int anslen, const char *qname, + int h_namelen = 0; + + if (ancount == 0) +- return NSS_STATUS_NOTFOUND; ++ { ++ *h_errnop = HOST_NOT_FOUND; ++ return NSS_STATUS_NOTFOUND; ++ } + + while (ancount-- > 0 && cp < end_of_message && had_error == 0) + { +@@ -1226,7 +1229,14 @@ gaih_getanswer_slice (const querybuf *answer, int anslen, const char *qname, + /* Special case here: if the resolver sent a result but it only + contains a CNAME while we are looking for a T_A or T_AAAA record, + we fail with NOTFOUND instead of TRYAGAIN. */ +- return canon == NULL ? NSS_STATUS_TRYAGAIN : NSS_STATUS_NOTFOUND; ++ if (canon != NULL) ++ { ++ *h_errnop = HOST_NOT_FOUND; ++ return NSS_STATUS_NOTFOUND; ++ } ++ ++ *h_errnop = NETDB_INTERNAL; ++ return NSS_STATUS_TRYAGAIN; + } + + +@@ -1240,11 +1250,101 @@ gaih_getanswer (const querybuf *answer1, int anslen1, const querybuf *answer2, + + enum nss_status status = NSS_STATUS_NOTFOUND; + ++ /* Combining the NSS status of two distinct queries requires some ++ compromise and attention to symmetry (A or AAAA queries can be ++ returned in any order). What follows is a breakdown of how this ++ code is expected to work and why. We discuss only SUCCESS, ++ TRYAGAIN, NOTFOUND and UNAVAIL, since they are the only returns ++ that apply (though RETURN and MERGE exist). We make a distinction ++ between TRYAGAIN (recoverable) and TRYAGAIN' (not-recoverable). ++ A recoverable TRYAGAIN is almost always due to buffer size issues ++ and returns ERANGE in errno and the caller is expected to retry ++ with a larger buffer. ++ ++ Lastly, you may be tempted to make significant changes to the ++ conditions in this code to bring about symmetry between responses. ++ Please don't change anything without due consideration for ++ expected application behaviour. Some of the synthesized responses ++ aren't very well thought out and sometimes appear to imply that ++ IPv4 responses are always answer 1, and IPv6 responses are always ++ answer 2, but that's not true (see the implementation of send_dg ++ and send_vc to see response can arrive in any order, particularly ++ for UDP). However, we expect it holds roughly enough of the time ++ that this code works, but certainly needs to be fixed to make this ++ a more robust implementation. ++ ++ ---------------------------------------------- ++ | Answer 1 Status / | Synthesized | Reason | ++ | Answer 2 Status | Status | | ++ |--------------------------------------------| ++ | SUCCESS/SUCCESS | SUCCESS | [1] | ++ | SUCCESS/TRYAGAIN | TRYAGAIN | [5] | ++ | SUCCESS/TRYAGAIN' | SUCCESS | [1] | ++ | SUCCESS/NOTFOUND | SUCCESS | [1] | ++ | SUCCESS/UNAVAIL | SUCCESS | [1] | ++ | TRYAGAIN/SUCCESS | TRYAGAIN | [2] | ++ | TRYAGAIN/TRYAGAIN | TRYAGAIN | [2] | ++ | TRYAGAIN/TRYAGAIN' | TRYAGAIN | [2] | ++ | TRYAGAIN/NOTFOUND | TRYAGAIN | [2] | ++ | TRYAGAIN/UNAVAIL | TRYAGAIN | [2] | ++ | TRYAGAIN'/SUCCESS | SUCCESS | [3] | ++ | TRYAGAIN'/TRYAGAIN | TRYAGAIN | [3] | ++ | TRYAGAIN'/TRYAGAIN' | TRYAGAIN' | [3] | ++ | TRYAGAIN'/NOTFOUND | TRYAGAIN' | [3] | ++ | TRYAGAIN'/UNAVAIL | UNAVAIL | [3] | ++ | NOTFOUND/SUCCESS | SUCCESS | [3] | ++ | NOTFOUND/TRYAGAIN | TRYAGAIN | [3] | ++ | NOTFOUND/TRYAGAIN' | TRYAGAIN' | [3] | ++ | NOTFOUND/NOTFOUND | NOTFOUND | [3] | ++ | NOTFOUND/UNAVAIL | UNAVAIL | [3] | ++ | UNAVAIL/SUCCESS | UNAVAIL | [4] | ++ | UNAVAIL/TRYAGAIN | UNAVAIL | [4] | ++ | UNAVAIL/TRYAGAIN' | UNAVAIL | [4] | ++ | UNAVAIL/NOTFOUND | UNAVAIL | [4] | ++ | UNAVAIL/UNAVAIL | UNAVAIL | [4] | ++ ---------------------------------------------- ++ ++ [1] If the first response is a success we return success. ++ This ignores the state of the second answer and in fact ++ incorrectly sets errno and h_errno to that of the second ++ answer. However because the response is a success we ignore ++ *errnop and *h_errnop (though that means you touched errno on ++ success). We are being conservative here and returning the ++ likely IPv4 response in the first answer as a success. ++ ++ [2] If the first response is a recoverable TRYAGAIN we return ++ that instead of looking at the second response. The ++ expectation here is that we have failed to get an IPv4 response ++ and should retry both queries. ++ ++ [3] If the first response was not a SUCCESS and the second ++ response is not NOTFOUND (had a SUCCESS, need to TRYAGAIN, ++ or failed entirely e.g. TRYAGAIN' and UNAVAIL) then use the ++ result from the second response, otherwise the first responses ++ status is used. Again we have some odd side-effects when the ++ second response is NOTFOUND because we overwrite *errnop and ++ *h_errnop that means that a first answer of NOTFOUND might see ++ its *errnop and *h_errnop values altered. Whether it matters ++ in practice that a first response NOTFOUND has the wrong ++ *errnop and *h_errnop is undecided. ++ ++ [4] If the first response is UNAVAIL we return that instead of ++ looking at the second response. The expectation here is that ++ it will have failed similarly e.g. configuration failure. ++ ++ [5] Testing this code is complicated by the fact that truncated ++ second response buffers might be returned as SUCCESS if the ++ first answer is a SUCCESS. To fix this we add symmetry to ++ TRYAGAIN with the second response. If the second response ++ is a recoverable error we now return TRYAGIN even if the first ++ response was SUCCESS. */ ++ + if (anslen1 > 0) + status = gaih_getanswer_slice(answer1, anslen1, qname, + &pat, &buffer, &buflen, + errnop, h_errnop, ttlp, + &first); ++ + if ((status == NSS_STATUS_SUCCESS || status == NSS_STATUS_NOTFOUND + || (status == NSS_STATUS_TRYAGAIN + /* We want to look at the second answer in case of an +@@ -1260,8 +1360,15 @@ gaih_getanswer (const querybuf *answer1, int anslen1, const querybuf *answer2, + &pat, &buffer, &buflen, + errnop, h_errnop, ttlp, + &first); ++ /* Use the second response status in some cases. */ + if (status != NSS_STATUS_SUCCESS && status2 != NSS_STATUS_NOTFOUND) + status = status2; ++ /* Do not return a truncated second response (unless it was ++ unavoidable e.g. unrecoverable TRYAGAIN). */ ++ if (status == NSS_STATUS_SUCCESS ++ && (status2 == NSS_STATUS_TRYAGAIN ++ && *errnop == ERANGE && *h_errnop != NO_RECOVERY)) ++ status = NSS_STATUS_TRYAGAIN; + } + + return status; +diff --git a/resolv/res_query.c b/resolv/res_query.c +index 1325f9772ddc..dd87e097c461 100644 +--- a/resolv/res_query.c ++++ b/resolv/res_query.c +@@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ __libc_res_nsearch(res_state statp, + { + free (*answerp2); + *answerp2 = NULL; ++ *nanswerp2 = 0; + } + } + +@@ -431,6 +432,7 @@ __libc_res_nsearch(res_state statp, + { + free (*answerp2); + *answerp2 = NULL; ++ *nanswerp2 = 0; + } + + /* +@@ -502,6 +504,7 @@ __libc_res_nsearch(res_state statp, + { + free (*answerp2); + *answerp2 = NULL; ++ *nanswerp2 = 0; + } + if (saved_herrno != -1) + RES_SET_H_ERRNO(statp, saved_herrno); +diff --git a/resolv/res_send.c b/resolv/res_send.c +index 7f2e85f3240e..5940b0c7ebf7 100644 +--- a/resolv/res_send.c ++++ b/resolv/res_send.c +@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@ ++/* Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ++ This file is part of the GNU C Library. ++ ++ The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or ++ modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public ++ License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either ++ version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. ++ ++ The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, ++ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of ++ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU ++ Lesser General Public License for more details. ++ ++ You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public ++ License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see ++ . */ ++ + /* + * Copyright (c) 1985, 1989, 1993 + * The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. +@@ -360,6 +377,8 @@ __libc_res_nsend(res_state statp, const u_char *buf, int buflen, + #ifdef USE_HOOKS + if (__builtin_expect (statp->qhook || statp->rhook, 0)) { + if (anssiz < MAXPACKET && ansp) { ++ /* Always allocate MAXPACKET, callers expect ++ this specific size. */ + u_char *buf = malloc (MAXPACKET); + if (buf == NULL) + return (-1); +@@ -652,6 +671,77 @@ libresolv_hidden_def (res_nsend) + + /* Private */ + ++/* The send_vc function is responsible for sending a DNS query over TCP ++ to the nameserver numbered NS from the res_state STATP i.e. ++ EXT(statp).nssocks[ns]. The function supports sending both IPv4 and ++ IPv6 queries at the same serially on the same socket. ++ ++ Please note that for TCP there is no way to disable sending both ++ queries, unlike UDP, which honours RES_SNGLKUP and RES_SNGLKUPREOP ++ and sends the queries serially and waits for the result after each ++ sent query. This implemetnation should be corrected to honour these ++ options. ++ ++ Please also note that for TCP we send both queries over the same ++ socket one after another. This technically violates best practice ++ since the server is allowed to read the first query, respond, and ++ then close the socket (to service another client). If the server ++ does this, then the remaining second query in the socket data buffer ++ will cause the server to send the client an RST which will arrive ++ asynchronously and the client's OS will likely tear down the socket ++ receive buffer resulting in a potentially short read and lost ++ response data. This will force the client to retry the query again, ++ and this process may repeat until all servers and connection resets ++ are exhausted and then the query will fail. It's not known if this ++ happens with any frequency in real DNS server implementations. This ++ implementation should be corrected to use two sockets by default for ++ parallel queries. ++ ++ The query stored in BUF of BUFLEN length is sent first followed by ++ the query stored in BUF2 of BUFLEN2 length. Queries are sent ++ serially on the same socket. ++ ++ Answers to the query are stored firstly in *ANSP up to a max of ++ *ANSSIZP bytes. If more than *ANSSIZP bytes are needed and ANSCP ++ is non-NULL (to indicate that modifying the answer buffer is allowed) ++ then malloc is used to allocate a new response buffer and ANSCP and ++ ANSP will both point to the new buffer. If more than *ANSSIZP bytes ++ are needed but ANSCP is NULL, then as much of the response as ++ possible is read into the buffer, but the results will be truncated. ++ When truncation happens because of a small answer buffer the DNS ++ packets header field TC will bet set to 1, indicating a truncated ++ message and the rest of the socket data will be read and discarded. ++ ++ Answers to the query are stored secondly in *ANSP2 up to a max of ++ *ANSSIZP2 bytes, with the actual response length stored in ++ *RESPLEN2. If more than *ANSSIZP bytes are needed and ANSP2 ++ is non-NULL (required for a second query) then malloc is used to ++ allocate a new response buffer, *ANSSIZP2 is set to the new buffer ++ size and *ANSP2_MALLOCED is set to 1. ++ ++ The ANSP2_MALLOCED argument will eventually be removed as the ++ change in buffer pointer can be used to detect the buffer has ++ changed and that the caller should use free on the new buffer. ++ ++ Note that the answers may arrive in any order from the server and ++ therefore the first and second answer buffers may not correspond to ++ the first and second queries. ++ ++ It is not supported to call this function with a non-NULL ANSP2 ++ but a NULL ANSCP. Put another way, you can call send_vc with a ++ single unmodifiable buffer or two modifiable buffers, but no other ++ combination is supported. ++ ++ It is the caller's responsibility to free the malloc allocated ++ buffers by detecting that the pointers have changed from their ++ original values i.e. *ANSCP or *ANSP2 has changed. ++ ++ If errors are encountered then *TERRNO is set to an appropriate ++ errno value and a zero result is returned for a recoverable error, ++ and a less-than zero result is returned for a non-recoverable error. ++ ++ If no errors are encountered then *TERRNO is left unmodified and ++ a the length of the first response in bytes is returned. */ + static int + send_vc(res_state statp, + const u_char *buf, int buflen, const u_char *buf2, int buflen2, +@@ -661,11 +751,7 @@ send_vc(res_state statp, + { + const HEADER *hp = (HEADER *) buf; + const HEADER *hp2 = (HEADER *) buf2; +- u_char *ans = *ansp; +- int orig_anssizp = *anssizp; +- // XXX REMOVE +- // int anssiz = *anssizp; +- HEADER *anhp = (HEADER *) ans; ++ HEADER *anhp = (HEADER *) *ansp; + struct sockaddr_in6 *nsap = EXT(statp).nsaddrs[ns]; + int truncating, connreset, resplen, n; + struct iovec iov[4]; +@@ -741,6 +827,8 @@ send_vc(res_state statp, + * Receive length & response + */ + int recvresp1 = 0; ++ /* Skip the second response if there is no second query. ++ To do that we mark the second response as received. */ + int recvresp2 = buf2 == NULL; + uint16_t rlen16; + read_len: +@@ -777,33 +865,14 @@ send_vc(res_state statp, + u_char **thisansp; + int *thisresplenp; + if ((recvresp1 | recvresp2) == 0 || buf2 == NULL) { ++ /* We have not received any responses ++ yet or we only have one response to ++ receive. */ + thisanssizp = anssizp; + thisansp = anscp ?: ansp; + assert (anscp != NULL || ansp2 == NULL); + thisresplenp = &resplen; + } else { +- if (*anssizp != MAXPACKET) { +- /* No buffer allocated for the first +- reply. We can try to use the rest +- of the user-provided buffer. */ +-#ifdef _STRING_ARCH_unaligned +- *anssizp2 = orig_anssizp - resplen; +- *ansp2 = *ansp + resplen; +-#else +- int aligned_resplen +- = ((resplen + __alignof__ (HEADER) - 1) +- & ~(__alignof__ (HEADER) - 1)); +- *anssizp2 = orig_anssizp - aligned_resplen; +- *ansp2 = *ansp + aligned_resplen; +-#endif +- } else { +- /* The first reply did not fit into the +- user-provided buffer. Maybe the second +- answer will. */ +- *anssizp2 = orig_anssizp; +- *ansp2 = *ansp; +- } +- + thisanssizp = anssizp2; + thisansp = ansp2; + thisresplenp = resplen2; +@@ -811,10 +880,14 @@ send_vc(res_state statp, + anhp = (HEADER *) *thisansp; + + *thisresplenp = rlen; +- if (rlen > *thisanssizp) { +- /* Yes, we test ANSCP here. If we have two buffers +- both will be allocatable. */ +- if (__builtin_expect (anscp != NULL, 1)) { ++ /* Is the answer buffer too small? */ ++ if (*thisanssizp < rlen) { ++ /* If the current buffer is not the the static ++ user-supplied buffer then we can reallocate ++ it. */ ++ if (thisansp != NULL && thisansp != ansp) { ++ /* Always allocate MAXPACKET, callers expect ++ this specific size. */ + u_char *newp = malloc (MAXPACKET); + if (newp == NULL) { + *terrno = ENOMEM; +@@ -824,6 +897,9 @@ send_vc(res_state statp, + *thisanssizp = MAXPACKET; + *thisansp = newp; + anhp = (HEADER *) newp; ++ /* A uint16_t can't be larger than MAXPACKET ++ thus it's safe to allocate MAXPACKET but ++ read RLEN bytes instead. */ + len = rlen; + } else { + Dprint(statp->options & RES_DEBUG, +@@ -987,6 +1063,66 @@ reopen (res_state statp, int *terrno, int ns) + return 1; + } + ++/* The send_dg function is responsible for sending a DNS query over UDP ++ to the nameserver numbered NS from the res_state STATP i.e. ++ EXT(statp).nssocks[ns]. The function supports IPv4 and IPv6 queries ++ along with the ability to send the query in parallel for both stacks ++ (default) or serially (RES_SINGLKUP). It also supports serial lookup ++ with a close and reopen of the socket used to talk to the server ++ (RES_SNGLKUPREOP) to work around broken name servers. ++ ++ The query stored in BUF of BUFLEN length is sent first followed by ++ the query stored in BUF2 of BUFLEN2 length. Queries are sent ++ in parallel (default) or serially (RES_SINGLKUP or RES_SNGLKUPREOP). ++ ++ Answers to the query are stored firstly in *ANSP up to a max of ++ *ANSSIZP bytes. If more than *ANSSIZP bytes are needed and ANSCP ++ is non-NULL (to indicate that modifying the answer buffer is allowed) ++ then malloc is used to allocate a new response buffer and ANSCP and ++ ANSP will both point to the new buffer. If more than *ANSSIZP bytes ++ are needed but ANSCP is NULL, then as much of the response as ++ possible is read into the buffer, but the results will be truncated. ++ When truncation happens because of a small answer buffer the DNS ++ packets header field TC will bet set to 1, indicating a truncated ++ message, while the rest of the UDP packet is discarded. ++ ++ Answers to the query are stored secondly in *ANSP2 up to a max of ++ *ANSSIZP2 bytes, with the actual response length stored in ++ *RESPLEN2. If more than *ANSSIZP bytes are needed and ANSP2 ++ is non-NULL (required for a second query) then malloc is used to ++ allocate a new response buffer, *ANSSIZP2 is set to the new buffer ++ size and *ANSP2_MALLOCED is set to 1. ++ ++ The ANSP2_MALLOCED argument will eventually be removed as the ++ change in buffer pointer can be used to detect the buffer has ++ changed and that the caller should use free on the new buffer. ++ ++ Note that the answers may arrive in any order from the server and ++ therefore the first and second answer buffers may not correspond to ++ the first and second queries. ++ ++ It is not supported to call this function with a non-NULL ANSP2 ++ but a NULL ANSCP. Put another way, you can call send_vc with a ++ single unmodifiable buffer or two modifiable buffers, but no other ++ combination is supported. ++ ++ It is the caller's responsibility to free the malloc allocated ++ buffers by detecting that the pointers have changed from their ++ original values i.e. *ANSCP or *ANSP2 has changed. ++ ++ If an answer is truncated because of UDP datagram DNS limits then ++ *V_CIRCUIT is set to 1 and the return value non-zero to indicate to ++ the caller to retry with TCP. The value *GOTSOMEWHERE is set to 1 ++ if any progress was made reading a response from the nameserver and ++ is used by the caller to distinguish between ECONNREFUSED and ++ ETIMEDOUT (the latter if *GOTSOMEWHERE is 1). ++ ++ If errors are encountered then *TERRNO is set to an appropriate ++ errno value and a zero result is returned for a recoverable error, ++ and a less-than zero result is returned for a non-recoverable error. ++ ++ If no errors are encountered then *TERRNO is left unmodified and ++ a the length of the first response in bytes is returned. */ + static int + send_dg(res_state statp, + const u_char *buf, int buflen, const u_char *buf2, int buflen2, +@@ -996,8 +1132,6 @@ send_dg(res_state statp, + { + const HEADER *hp = (HEADER *) buf; + const HEADER *hp2 = (HEADER *) buf2; +- u_char *ans = *ansp; +- int orig_anssizp = *anssizp; + struct timespec now, timeout, finish; + struct pollfd pfd[1]; + int ptimeout; +@@ -1030,6 +1164,8 @@ send_dg(res_state statp, + int need_recompute = 0; + int nwritten = 0; + int recvresp1 = 0; ++ /* Skip the second response if there is no second query. ++ To do that we mark the second response as received. */ + int recvresp2 = buf2 == NULL; + pfd[0].fd = EXT(statp).nssocks[ns]; + pfd[0].events = POLLOUT; +@@ -1193,53 +1329,54 @@ send_dg(res_state statp, + int *thisresplenp; + + if ((recvresp1 | recvresp2) == 0 || buf2 == NULL) { ++ /* We have not received any responses ++ yet or we only have one response to ++ receive. */ + thisanssizp = anssizp; + thisansp = anscp ?: ansp; + assert (anscp != NULL || ansp2 == NULL); + thisresplenp = &resplen; + } else { +- if (*anssizp != MAXPACKET) { +- /* No buffer allocated for the first +- reply. We can try to use the rest +- of the user-provided buffer. */ +-#ifdef _STRING_ARCH_unaligned +- *anssizp2 = orig_anssizp - resplen; +- *ansp2 = *ansp + resplen; +-#else +- int aligned_resplen +- = ((resplen + __alignof__ (HEADER) - 1) +- & ~(__alignof__ (HEADER) - 1)); +- *anssizp2 = orig_anssizp - aligned_resplen; +- *ansp2 = *ansp + aligned_resplen; +-#endif +- } else { +- /* The first reply did not fit into the +- user-provided buffer. Maybe the second +- answer will. */ +- *anssizp2 = orig_anssizp; +- *ansp2 = *ansp; +- } +- + thisanssizp = anssizp2; + thisansp = ansp2; + thisresplenp = resplen2; + } + + if (*thisanssizp < MAXPACKET +- /* Yes, we test ANSCP here. If we have two buffers +- both will be allocatable. */ +- && anscp ++ /* If the current buffer is not the the static ++ user-supplied buffer then we can reallocate ++ it. */ ++ && (thisansp != NULL && thisansp != ansp) + #ifdef FIONREAD ++ /* Is the size too small? */ + && (ioctl (pfd[0].fd, FIONREAD, thisresplenp) < 0 + || *thisanssizp < *thisresplenp) + #endif + ) { ++ /* Always allocate MAXPACKET, callers expect ++ this specific size. */ + u_char *newp = malloc (MAXPACKET); + if (newp != NULL) { +- *anssizp = MAXPACKET; +- *thisansp = ans = newp; ++ *thisanssizp = MAXPACKET; ++ *thisansp = newp; + } + } ++ /* We could end up with truncation if anscp was NULL ++ (not allowed to change caller's buffer) and the ++ response buffer size is too small. This isn't a ++ reliable way to detect truncation because the ioctl ++ may be an inaccurate report of the UDP message size. ++ Therefore we use this only to issue debug output. ++ To do truncation accurately with UDP we need ++ MSG_TRUNC which is only available on Linux. We ++ can abstract out the Linux-specific feature in the ++ future to detect truncation. */ ++ if (__glibc_unlikely (*thisanssizp < *thisresplenp)) { ++ Dprint(statp->options & RES_DEBUG, ++ (stdout, ";; response may be truncated (UDP)\n") ++ ); ++ } ++ + HEADER *anhp = (HEADER *) *thisansp; + socklen_t fromlen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6); + assert (sizeof(from) <= fromlen); diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.19.bb b/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.19.bb index a15573c4d1..66ccedced2 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.19.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc_2.19.bb @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/eglibc/eglibc-${PV}-svnr25 file://CVE-2014-5119.patch \ file://CVE-2014-7817-wordexp-fails-to-honour-WRDE_NOCMD.patch \ file://CVE-2012-3406-Stack-overflow-in-vfprintf-BZ-16617.patch \ + file://CVE-2015-7547.patch \ " SRC_URI[md5sum] = "197836c2ba42fb146e971222647198dd" SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "baaa030531fc308f7820c46acdf8e1b2f8e3c1f40bcd28b6e440d1c95d170d4c" -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf