| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The bblayer abstraction makes it where multiple layers can be
configured and used at the same time. Some layers make changes to
support a specific machine, and should not have any affect when other
machines are in use.
For linux-yocto, all bsps are created with a user-config.cfg and
user-config.cfg and user-patches.scc. This means that those files
will be pulled from the first location found, which might correspond
to files customized for a different machine.
Instead of using the names user-config.cfg and user-patches.scc, I
propose a machine specific name be used such as
{{=machine}}user-patches.scc and {{=machine}}user-config.cfg. This
would necessitate that all references changed to these new names,
which would affect the yocto-bsp and yocto-kernel scripts.
With this change, it would be possible to have multiple machine BSPs
searched at the same time and to select which to build against by
using a command like MACHINE=qmeux86 bitbake core-image-sato to
override the default.
Note many of the standard BSPs do not seem to suffer this problem as
they do not use the common files user-config.cfg and user-patches.scc
that the yocto-* scripts depend upon.
Additions by Tom Zanussi:
- renamed user-config.cfg to {{=machine}}-user-config.cfg everywhere
- renamed user-patches.scc to {{=machine}}-user-patches.scc everywhere
- added the user-config/patches SRC_URI items to the qemu -rt kernel recipes
Fixes [YOCTO #3731]
(From meta-yocto rev: b148d800773f3c2e6edeb4f05850b0291a8bb7d5)
Signed-off-by: Brian A. Lloyd <brian.lloyd@familyhonor.net>
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new yocto-kernel way of specifying that the branch sanity check
doesn't need to be run is to specify a default kbranch and build that.
In the case where we have a new kbranch but it's not yet in the repo,
we need to tell it that our new branch is the default and we're
building the default and that's how we avoid the sanity check and the
subsequent do_validate_branches() failure.
(From meta-yocto rev: dadd020c67e901609be3ac13a4ffd8cb28532966)
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
YOCTO_KERNEL_EXTERNAL_BRANCH is now obsolete, so remove it from the
templates.
(From meta-yocto rev: 0c440984f3f429d5282559208313dfe7492b8b90)
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
|
For 1.3, 3.4 is the preferred kernel and 3.0 isn't supported.
(From meta-yocto rev: ef7f8257ec9830e3eab0acec20564105d23a74f7)
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
|
