summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/meta
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* vulkan: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-5/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 453a433768bff76e4d3ad9bf40fd9d8210b0950e) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* xproto: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-4/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: a9f9ca73840d1e6911e496a32ee862a724615b50) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* libxcb: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-8/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 4a3d8806d25e146be40eaf640bc6da8bdd1b6e05) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* libaio: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: e3e8c2ec038c95d8203c4886ef46aec6b0741837) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* lsb: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-10/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: fc856d4539a13f1ea6bf7ce347e9ca85577ecfb8) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* screen: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-11/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: e0a363d3374738d1bc8a0889dade83d2c35ef964) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* sysstat: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-16/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 4a0c9bb514ff3d6966f1da480cd48c076403f58d) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* unzip: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-5/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: b45ce6dbbd459ecc96eae76b5695927dbda1dbb4) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* watchdog: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-6/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 7c8e3b9bd26b35654f3bd24bbb8d86b8c6e34a67) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* sysklogd: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: a441306ce9de4ca1cc07dfb8aa330e8d6d67e651) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* btrfs-tools: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-10/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: d7696f5f89ac94b5cae13c5e07d6d4c7133c3ed9) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* elfutils: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-23/+23
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 2526fcfac8e360d5d27f5ebe26608df470b3b84b) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* ccache: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-8/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 4bfeaf65d3f48174d27af09ac4279c1c91bf4104) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* flex: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: a17860995731ab1e327bf88953fa3ed4641b584e) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* mtools: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-8/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 24674afaf90491e898bfd2c12992a1b5c5e8d2f4) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* squashfs-tools: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 319de7e44f9fc853b53f2628abaf640d8241f615) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* iproute2: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: f369e9dce9dc2bcd89b2492545112da78aca690e) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* neard: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-9/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 1aa6e504b21d1e7290d81af8fc7863053269a196) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* nfs-utils: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-073-25/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 0902bef12c815f302f04fa28606ece4b014260d6) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* dropbear: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-10/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 18300f8faa5050178efcd22f2db843f9b3f3bb0f) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* kbd: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-13/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: b1fa565ffa02796eaa55f5ac6700f1a932d62957) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* libxml: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-23/+20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: d71d6854fadc96fc3c75617af3beba02952fdef6) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* ovmf: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 68d567bd64debc3dfb37df3c814287549da56a3b) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* gtk+: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-7/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 7ac8688c9fce49a005cbe9afe028453f6fea4e79) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* gobject-introspection: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-22/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 5a72d04296cc7aea5893cba29c6da1cf1469911b) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* dbus-glib: refresh patchesRoss Burton2018-03-071-4/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the patch in. Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad. We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and reviewed. (From OE-Core rev: 9f15e5256eb79c8cfc4b3a4e11617eeb5f38edea) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* dbus: remove upstreamed patchRoss Burton2018-03-072-39/+0
| | | | | | | (From OE-Core rev: 887afb4cf326cf3ad37761343db9e898dbcad2f5) Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* util-linux: add taskset to alternatives listLars Persson2018-03-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | The taskset command is provided by both busybox and util-linux. (From OE-Core rev: 83a36fb20f8cb0e45295cb71b76e74af3986f993) Signed-off-by: Lars Persson <larper@axis.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* gdb: fix header ordering for TRAP_HWBKPTDaniel Díaz2018-03-062-0/+52
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This error can appear in gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.c because of the order in which some headers are processed: | In file included from ../../gdb-7.11.1/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.c:20:0: | ../../gdb-7.11.1/gdb/nat/linux-ptrace.h:175:22: error: expected identifier before numeric constant | # define TRAP_HWBKPT 4 | ^ | Makefile:2357: recipe for target 'linux-ptrace.o' failed | make[2]: *** [linux-ptrace.o] Error 1 | make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... | make[2]: Leaving directory '/oe/build/tmp-rpb-glibc/work/aarch64-linaro-linux/gdb/7.11.1-r0/build-aarch64-linaro-linux/gdb' | Makefile:8822: recipe for target 'all-gdb' failed | make[1]: *** [all-gdb] Error 2 | make[1]: Leaving directory '/oe/build/tmp-rpb-glibc/work/aarch64-linaro-linux/gdb/7.11.1-r0/build-aarch64-linaro-linux' | Makefile:846: recipe for target 'all' failed | make: *** [all] Error 2 A patch from GDB's current master solves the issue. (From OE-Core rev: 4aaf747099714ec11158571527396ed9e818729e) Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* glibc: add missing TRAP_BRANCH/TRAP_HWBKPT definitionsFathi Boudra2018-03-062-0/+70
| | | | | | | | | | | | Patch submitted upstream, pending to be merged: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21286 (From OE-Core rev: 11ebb5054e5ec1171ade90249e3a30ac8174a35a) Signed-off-by: Fathi Boudra <fathi.boudra@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* e2fsprogs_1.43.8.bb: improve reproducibilityJuro Bystricky2018-03-061-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Various builds of e2fsprogs 1.43.7 package locales which may or may not have POT-Creation-Date removed. There is no obvious pattern, it affects different locales each time, the build being non-deterministic. The root cause was tracked to non-deterministic time stamps (as GIT does not preserve file mktime), so some "make" rules sometimes fired, sometimes did not. The remedy is to explicitly "touch" files that cause non-deterministic build. [YOCTO #12516] (From OE-Core rev: b32f3b655189fd89dcfce084b6fda0d379300f75) Signed-off-by: Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* kmscube: Add patch for missing GBM functionDaniel Díaz2018-03-062-1/+118
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Some implementations of GBM, like the one included with libMali, do not have gbm_bo_map() nor gbm_bo_unmap(). This patch enables kmscube to work with those implementations even if it doesn't work as great. (From OE-Core rev: 54615151da5e8c77c803947ce5760d06c1691c58) Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* meson.bbclass: fix to build for more projectsChen Qi2018-03-061-12/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We should use the value of CC for the c compiler setting in cross compilation configuration file for meson. For example, if we only use ${HOST_PREFIX}gcc instead of ${CC}, we would meet the following do_compile failure for systemd. cc1: fatal error: linux/capability.h: No such file or directory Do the same change for LD, AR, NM, STRIP and READELF. (From OE-Core rev: 177bd96a531fcc85e62baff04aba327e2bccee07) Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* libconvert-asn1-perl: inherit ptest-perlTim Orling2018-03-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | * Enable ptest using new ptest-perl.bbclass (From OE-Core rev: 04f49bc0f9c56ef9b6970891058c200968c5ded9) Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <timothy.t.orling@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* dtc: add rdepends_${PN}-misc = diffutilsIoan-Adrian Ratiu2018-03-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Needed by dtdiff which calls `diff` to display its result. (From OE-Core rev: ace8b318038389c07694ae5234811ce92982ddc8) Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <adi@adirat.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* diffutils: allow native & nativesdk buildsIoan-Adrian Ratiu2018-03-061-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Required by the new dtc rdepends to avoid errors like this: ERROR: Required build target 'ionel-rpi-image' has no buildable providers. Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['ionel-rpi-image', 'nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host', 'nativesdk-qemu', 'nativesdk-dtc', 'nativesdk-diffutils'] (From OE-Core rev: dc3829f31bcc7522e8eb457623a74655a738c0d9) Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <adi@adirat.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* godep.bbclass: Add helper class to enable go-dep toolKhem Raj2018-03-061-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | Many go packages can take advantage of dep tool since they manage their own dependencies, this class helps in using go dep tool for such packages (From OE-Core rev: 9bea8313b0dd5a6af08d15ee8634fe2ef9ee0f75) Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* tcmode-default.inc: add settings for goMatt Madison2018-03-061-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | to allow GOVERSION to be set for using an older go toolchain. (From OE-Core rev: 10193150381b1088a5de627aed0ad1d052a3955d) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* go-runtime: remove unneeded nativesdk override, rename variableMatt Madison2018-03-061-4/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | since GO_LDFLAGS is also used by the dist tool, and it's confusing to use a variable with the same name (but not exported, so unused by make.bash/dist). (From OE-Core rev: b5ee166307ea095c77237e06744dff6810800bad) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* packagegroup-go-sdk-target: add go-runtime-staticdevMatt Madison2018-03-061-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | to allow go programs to be linked either statically or dynamically when cross-compiling with the SDK. (From OE-Core rev: d2201447692940a5b21977fc28e6b944e3a53d3c) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* go: disable PIE CFLAGS for nativesdk and cross-canadian buildsMatt Madison2018-03-063-7/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | The statically-linked Go code in the toolchain is not compatible with PIE, so disable its use in the C compiler during the toolchain build. (From OE-Core rev: cc7b179917c715b29822200fe91ecd755a5750e6) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* go.bbclass, goarch.bbclass: update SECURITY_CFLAGSMatt Madison2018-03-062-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | With go1.10 the NOPIE flags are only required for MIPS target builds, and are now incompatible for the other architectures. (From OE-Core rev: f2ff90eb7d27a2f69f5948fa8c301de30f5c8132) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* go: move common settings to go-common.incMatt Madison2018-03-067-23/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Eliminate some redundancy in the recipes by moving some commonly-used variable settings to the common include file. Also removed a duplicate inherit from go-target.inc that was already in go-common.inc. (From OE-Core rev: e72d2a7b7ee7913095a35ae92c3ca364de00c8a7) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* goarch.bbclass: disable shared runtime for nativesdk buildsMatt Madison2018-03-061-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | While useful on embedded devices for saving disk space, use of shared runtime in Go is not the usual practice, so disable it for nativesdk builds. We don't use it for native builds, either, so this makes the SDK match the native environment more closely. (From OE-Core rev: fde7017f9735c0d317023022817b28771df53109) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* go.bbclass: ptest cleanup and improvementsMatt Madison2018-03-061-36/+51
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Don't enable verbose test output (-test.v) by default, as it generates too much noise for automated results parsing * Override do_install_ptest_base in the bbclass, so recipes can provide their own modifications with do_install_ptest. * Improve the generated run-ptest script to better handle large numbers of tests, and to generate 'status: test name' output similar to Automake tests. * Install all non-vendored 'testdata' directories from the source into the ptest package, as some packages share test data among multiple tests. (From OE-Core rev: 11037462d80cefbee90a69e6a8a95895375ed6da) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* go.bbclass: don't stage test data with sourcesMatt Madison2018-03-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Any directory in a Go package's source tree called 'testdata' contains test data, and isn't necessary for building. Some packages include ELF files and other binaries as test data, and staging them in the sysroot and -dev package leads to unnecessary QA warnings. (From OE-Core rev: b013db7ab58d4d56ad5c6e54a3a32df31aaf8809) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* go.bbclass: remove debug-related commandsMatt Madison2018-03-061-3/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The 'go env' in the do_compile function and the set -x/+x in the do_install_ptest function were used for debugging the bbclass, and aren't really needed. (From OE-Core rev: 351e9fc39408e094bbb4beedf51221adc8afd143) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* go.bbclass: rename GO_TMPDIR -> GOTMPDIRMatt Madison2018-03-061-6/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | and export it. Go 1.10 now supports using this separate variable locating its temporary files. TMPDIR is still set, for compatibility with go1.9; that can be dropped once 1.9 is retired. (From OE-Core rev: ce9d70ae2f9981bf5b42641922c34c1ed54eeca3) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* go: set GOMIPS envrionment variableMatt Madison2018-03-065-0/+16
| | | | | | | | | | | Go 1.10 adds support for selecting hard/soft float object code through the GOMIPS environment variable. (From OE-Core rev: f3cabc92dca3408da18f04e4af4051fba1f63c14) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* go: update go 1.9 -> go 1.10Matt Madison2018-03-0630-104/+1183
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * Patches and recipes reworked for go 1.10's significant changes to its bootstrap and build steps. * Update go1.4 source tarball used for go-native bootstrapping to the version recommended in the current go documentation * Remove test data from installed sources to eliminate some packaging QA warnings * Set GOCACHE to 'off' to disable 1.10's build caching in the go recipes and bbclass * Update go_do_compile to compile both static and dynamic objects dynamic linking is in use, since go1.10's build tool is pickier about this (From OE-Core rev: 4fd749ca6450a4870be1c1e13802f084b6eb0db6) Signed-off-by: Matt Madison <matt@madison.systems> Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>